Attribution Processes in Victims of Marital Violence: Who Do Women Blame and Why?
There is a growing body of literature concerning the attributions of those involved in interpersonal conflict and marital distress (e.g., Fincham & Bradbury, 1988; Holtzworth-Munroe & Jacobson, 1985; Orvis, Kelley, & Butler, 1976; Sillars, 1981). The focus in this literature has often been on an actor’s perceptions of his or her partner, and the studies reveal that those involved in such conflict are likely to attribute blame to the stable characteristics of their partners or adversaries. Furthermore, distressed married couples have been distinguished from the nondistressed by their propensity to make such attributions (Fincham, Beach, & Baucom, 1987). Most of these studies treat actor and partner as equals in their relationship struggles, so that neither is perceived as being a victim of the other. Research has concentrated on the consequences of attributions for subsequent marital satisfaction, and there has therefore been no apparent need to consider in any depth the origins of attributions and whether they are in fact justified.
KeywordsViolent Relationship Violent Spouse Marital Violence Marital Distress Attribution Process
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Borkowski, M., Murch, M., & Walker, V. (1983). Marital Violence: The community response. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
- Finkelhor, D. (1983). Common features of family abuse. In D. Finkelhor, R. Gelles, G. Hotaling, & M. Straus (Eds.), The dark side of families: Current family violence research. 17–28 London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Frieze, I. (1979). Perceptions of battered wives. In I. Frieze, D. Bar-Tal, & J.S. Carroll (Eds.), 79–108 New approaches to social problems. San Francisco: Jossye-Bass.Google Scholar
- Harvey, J.H., Orbuch, T.L., Chwalisz, K.D., & Garwood, G. (1990) Coping with sexual assault: The roles of account making and confiding. Unpublished manuscript, University of Iowa.Google Scholar
- Herbruck, C. (1979). Breaking the cycle of child abuse. Minneapohs, MN: Winston Press.Google Scholar
- Ickes, W.J., & Layden, M.A. (1978). Attributional styles. In J.H. Harvey, W.J. Ickes, & R.F. Kidd (Eds.), New directions in attribution research (Vol. 2). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Kelley, H.H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation. Vol. 15. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
- Medea, A. & Thompson, K. (1974). Against rape. New York: Farrar, Strauss & Giroux.Google Scholar
- Orvis, B.R., Kelley, H.H., & Butler, D. (1976). Attributional conflict in young couples. In J.H. Harvey, W.J. Ickes, & R.F. Kidd (Eds.), New directions in attribution research (Vol. 1). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbarum.Google Scholar
- Sillars, A.L. (1981). Attributions and Interpersonal Conflict Resolution In J.H. Harvey, W. Ickes, & R.F. Kidd (Eds.), New Directions in Attribution Research (Vol. 3). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Silver, R.L., & Wortman, C.B. (1980). Coping with undesirable life events. In J. Garber & M.E.P. Seligman (Eds.), Human helplessness: Theory and applications. 279–340 New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Straus, M., Gelles, R., & Steinmetz, S. (1980). Behind closed doors: Violence in the American family. New York: Anchor.Google Scholar
- Walker, L.E. (1983). The battered woman syndrome. In D. Finkelhor, R. Gelles, G. Hotaling, & M. Straus (Eds.), The dark side of families: Current family violence research. 31–48 London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Walker, L.E. (1979). The Battered Woman. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
- Wing, J.K., Cooper, J.E., & Sartorius, N. (1974). The Measurement and classification of psychiatric symptoms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar