Mechatronics pp 114-156 | Cite as

Poles and Zeros

  • Denny K. Miu
Part of the Mechanical Engineering Series book series (MES)

Abstract

In Part I, we have discussed various topics relevant to electromechanics which is the study of energy interaction between electrical and mechanical components. We demonstrated that the dynamics of complex electromechanical systems can be best understood by identifying the interaction between various energy storage and energy dissipation elements, some of which can be purely electrical (capacitance, inductance, resistance), some purely mechanical (compliance, inertia, damping), and some are in fact electromechanical (magnetic and piezoelectric coupling, etc.). In Part II, we shall discuss various topics related to contromechanics which is the study of energy interaction between control and electromechanical components. The purpose of control, as we have mentioned already, is to enhance the performance of the electromechanical systems.

Keywords

Migration Torque Dition Dinates Mast 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Balas, M.J., 1979, “Direct Velocity Feedback Control of Large Space Structures,” Journal of Guidance and Control, Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 252–253.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cannon, R.H., Jr. and Rosenthal, D.E., 1984, “Experiments in Control of Flexible Structures with Non-Colocated Sensors and Actuators,” Journal of Guidance and Control, Vol. 7, No. 5, pp. 546–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cannon, R.H., Jr. and Schmitz, E., 1984, “Initial Experiments on the End-Point Control of Flexible One-Link Robot,” International Journal of Robotic Research, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 62–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Edmunds, R.S., 1982, “Robust Control System Design Techniques for Large Flexible Space Structures Having Non-Colocated Sensors and Actuators,” Ph.D. Dissertation, UCLA.Google Scholar
  5. Franklin, P., and Emami-Naeine, 1986, Feedback Control of Dynamic Systems, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.MATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Gevarter, W.B., 1970, “Basic Relations for Control of Flexible Vehicles,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 666–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Goodson, R.E., 1970, “Distributed System Simulation Using Finite Product Expansion,” Simulation, December, pp. 255–263.Google Scholar
  8. Graff, K.F., 1975, Wave Motion in Elastic Solids, Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Hurty, W.C. and Rubinstein, M., Dynamics of Structures, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.Google Scholar
  10. Mal, A.K. and Singh, S.J., 1991, Deformation of Elastic Solids, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.Google Scholar
  11. Martin, G., 1978, “On the Control of Flexible Mechanical Systems,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
  12. Meirovitch, L., 1967, Analytical Methods in Vibrations, Macmillan Company, New York.MATHGoogle Scholar
  13. Miu, D.K., 1991, “Physical Interpretation of Transfer Function Zeros for Simple Control Systems with Mechanical Flexibilities,” ASME Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control, Vol. 113, No. 3, Sept., pp. 419–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Miu, D.K. and Yang, B., 1991 “On Transfer Function Zeros of General Colocated Control Systems with Mechanical Flexibilities,” presented at the 1991 ASME Winter Annual Meeting, Atlanta, Ga., Paper 91-WA-DSC-8.Google Scholar
  15. Spanos, J.T., 1989, “Control-Structure Interaction in Precison Pointing Servo Loops,” Journal of Guidance and Control, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 256–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Spector, V., 1988, “Modeling of Flexible Systems for Control System Design,” Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Southern California.Google Scholar
  17. Spector, V. and Flashner, H., 1989, “Sensitivity of Structural Models for Non-Colocated Control Systems,” ASME Journal of Dynamics Systems, Measurement and Control, Vol. 111, Dec., pp. 646–655.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Spector, V. and Flashner, H., 1990, “Modeling and Design Implications of Non-Colocated Control in Flexible Systems,” ASME Journal of Dynamics Systems, Measurement and Control, Vol. 112, June, pp. 186–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Thomspon, W.T., 1965, Theory of Vibration with Applications, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.Google Scholar
  20. Vidyasagar, M. and Momis, K.A., 1987, “An Analysis of Euler Bernoulli Beams from the Standpoint of Controller Design,” in Proceedings of ASME Winter Annual Meeting, Boston, DSC-Vol. 6,, pp. 297–305.Google Scholar
  21. Wie, B., 1981, “On the Modeling and Control of Flexible Space Structures,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Stanford UniversityGoogle Scholar
  22. Wie, B., 1988, “Active Vibration Control Synthesis for the Control of Flexible Structures Mast Flight System,” AIAA Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 11, No. 3, May–June, pp. 271–276.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wie, B. and Bryson, A.E., Jr., 1988, “Pole-Zero Modeling of Flexible Space Structures,” AIAA Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 11, No. 6, Nov.–Dec., pp. 554–561.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Denny K. Miu
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical, Aerospace and Nuclear EngineeringUniversity of California, Los AngelesLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations