Skip to main content

Legal Issues in Alzheimer Disease Research in France

  • Chapter
Alzheimer Disease

Part of the book series: Advances in Alzheimer Disease Therapy ((AADT))

  • 329 Accesses

Abstract

Therapy testing on man is as old as medicine itself. In honor of this, Article 15 of the Code of Medical Ethics, in no uncertain terms, requires doctors to “ensure the regularity of… biomedical research.” Alzheimer’s disease, a form of senile dementia and a biological enigma affecting more than 400,000 persons in France, remains a challenge to experimental medicine (LaRevue du Practicien, 1995). For French specialists, neurologists and gerontologists, THA (Tetrahydroaminoacrinine or tacrine) appeared to be a possible therapy, leading to an administrative marketing permit in April, 1994 (La Presse médicale, 1995). At present, the “best candidates” for tacrine are notably “those who are in a position to be included in research protocols for more efficient and tolerated medicine” (Derouesne, (1994); LaRevue du Practicien, 1994).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Article L 209–9 (1988): Before proceeding with any research on human beings, all investigators are obligated to submit a project to this committee. In: Conditions of Consent, December 20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Assemblée Nationale (Charles M): This analysis is based on the interpretation of the law of the House of Representatives according to whom the law embraces “research (diagnostic, therapeutic and preventative research) including the examination of medical substances, as well as research linked with all new surgical technics”.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaudoin J-L and Parizeau M-H (1987): Legal and Ethic Reflections Concerning Consent to Medical Treatment, Medicine-Science 3: 8–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bick C (1983): Concerning European case law. Medical Research and Human Rights, the European approach. JPC 1:3719.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouvenet G, and Eschwege E (1994): Therapy Testing and Informed Consent - Methodological Bases, Legal and Ethical Aspects. La Revue du Practicien Vol. 44:2767–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouvier F (1986): An opinion relating to “Ethical Problems Raised by the Testing of New Treatments on Men” In: Consent to Therapy: Realities and Perspectives, J C P 1:3249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Code of Public Health (1990): The application decree N° 90–872 dated September 27, 1990, introduced in the regulations section a book II b entitled “Protection of Individuals Volunteering for Biomedical Research”.

    Google Scholar 

  • COGNEXTM (1994): This document signed on September 9, 1994 by the directors of social security of hospitals and health, outlines the mode of prescriptions and the pharmacological oversight of COGNEX, one of the first medicines with a degree of efficiency in treating Alzheimer’s disease.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission, (1979): X versus Austria. December 13, N° 8278–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derouesne C, (1994): Which kind of patients with Alzheimer’s disease can be treated and how? Reply to V. Lemaire’s note In: Le Concours Médical, September 17, pp. 2392–2393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duprat J-P (1982): Information and Consent of the Patient in the Case of Tests of Medicine on Humans. RTDSS:369.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Convention of Human Rights Commission (1983): establishes the prohibition to submitting of an individual to inhumane or degrading treatment. Article 3 March 2, N° 9974/82: D.R. 32:292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagot-Largeault A (1994): Informed Consent, Medicine and Law, N° 6, May-June, pp. 55–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasmin C (1991): Bioethics and Therapeutic Research: Informed Consent, Médecine-Science May, N°5, Vol.7: p. 473.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Documentationfrançaise (1988): Documentary notes and studies. -5, N°.4855:23.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Presse médicale (1995): This substance, commercialized under the tradename COGNEX was previously only available in the United States. February 4, N° 5, pp. 285.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Revue du Practicien (1994): Coverage Forms for Alzheimer’s Patients. September 26, pp. 17–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Revue du Practicien (1995): This neurological degenerative complaint is characterized notably by the appearance of problems of memory, personality and language. December 18, pp. 7–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labbée X (1995): Medical Experimentation,Médecine et Droit N° 11:10–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Litec (1993): Biomedical Research on Man: Medical and Hospital-Related Law. 5-, Fasc. 34:3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maurain C and Viala G (1985): On the difficulty of a right to therapeutic information: Legal Limits of Therapeutic Information. JPC I:3203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montador J (1971): The absence of Consent and Hospital Public Service’s Responsibility, RTDSS: 180–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuremberg Code (1949):.”It is absolutely necessary to obtain the voluntary consent of the patient…For the duration of the tests, the volunteer patient will have the right to decide to stop the tests if these cause him mental or physical discomfort and if, in any other manner, the continuation of the tests seems impossible to him”. In: United States vs Karl Brandt et al.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parizeau M H (1988): Randomization, double blinds, placebos or reference medicine In: The Concept of Consent to Human Experimentation, doctorate of philosophy thesis, University Paris XII

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy D J (1986): Medical and Research Practices; North-American Perspectives on Consent. Medicine and Hygiene 44:2014–2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabatini J (1990): From Absence of Consent to Tape of a Person. Rev Prat. 40:935–936.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thouvenin D (1985): Human Experimentation: on the Concept of Informed Consent, Technical Culture, November, N° 15:109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thouvenin D (1988): The Reference to the Care Contract in Experimentation on Humans, In: Medical Ethics and Human Rights, Actes Sud-Inserm: 123–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward W (1979): Informed consent of volunteers: a direct measurement of comprehension and retention of information, Clinical research 27:248.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Birkhäuser Boston

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Garay, A. (1997). Legal Issues in Alzheimer Disease Research in France. In: Becker, R.E., Giacobini, E., Barton, J.M., Brown, M. (eds) Alzheimer Disease. Advances in Alzheimer Disease Therapy. Birkhäuser Boston. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4116-4_82

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4116-4_82

  • Publisher Name: Birkhäuser Boston

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-8660-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-4116-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics