Advertisement

Comparative Review of Recently Introduced Oral Contraceptives Containing Norgestimate, Desogestrel, and Gestodene and Older Oral Contraceptives

  • Thomas H. Schwend
  • Joel S. Lippman
Part of the Hormones in Health and Disease book series (HHD)

Abstract

In the 30 years that oral contraceptives (OCs) have been available, they have undergone a remarkable evolution with respect to both the dosage of estrogen and progestin used, as well as the type of progestational agent. There is considerable interest today in oral contraceptive formulations containing the progestins norgestimate, desogestrel, and gestodene; some formulations of these agents appear to offer particularly favorable clinical and metabolic profiles when used in combination with low doses of ethinyl estradiol. An extensive review of the OC literature reveals that these formulations provide contraceptive efficacy and cycle control commensurate with that of the older formulations. A substantial body of data attest to their lower androgenicity and favorable effects on lipid metabolism. In the search for compounds that offer women both efficacy and contraceptive benefits with the lowest incidence of adverse effects, the introduction of the norgestimate and desogestrel-containing OCs represents an important milestone. The following discussion focuses specifically on the clinical advantages of these three progestins versus the older agents that may potentially affect considerations for prescribing.

Keywords

Oral Contraceptive Ethinyl Estradiol Combine Oral Contraceptive Ethinyl Estradiol Cyproterone Acetate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Inman WHW, Vessey MP, Westerholm B, et al (1970). Thromboembolic disease and the steroidal content of oral contraceptives: A report to the Committee on Safety of Drugs. Br Med J 2:203–209.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Royal College of General Practitioners (1974). Oral Contraceptives and Health: An Interim Report London, Pitman.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vessey MP, Coll R, Peto R, et al (1975). A long-term follow up of women using different methods of contraception: An interim report. J Biosoc Sci 8:373–27.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wynn V, Doar JWH, Mills GL (1966). Some effects of oral contraceptives on serum lipid and lipoprotein levels. Lancet 720–723.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Meade TW, Greenberg G, Thompson SG (1980). Progestogens and cardiovascular reactions associated with oral contraceptives and a comparison of the safety of 50-and 30-ug oestrogen preparations. BMJ 280:1157–1161.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kay CR (1982). Progestogens and arterial disease—Evidence from the Royal College of General Practitioners’ Study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 142:762–765.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Porter JB, Hunter JR, Jick H, et al (1985). Oral contraceptives and nonfatal vascular disease. Obstet Gynecol 66:1–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wynn V, Niththyananthan R (1982). The effect of progestins in combined oral contraceptives on serum lipids with special reference to high-density lipoproteins. Am J Obstet Gynecol 142:766–772.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rozenbaum H (1982). Relationships between chemical structure and biological properties of progestogens. Am J Obstet Gynecol 142:719–724.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wahl T, Waiden C, Clock R, et al (1983). Effect of estrogen/progestin potency on lipid/lipoprotein cholesterol. N Engl J Med 308:862–867.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fotherby K. Potency and pharmacokinetics of gestagens (1990). Contraception 41:533–550.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chez R (1989). Clinical aspects of three new progestogens: Desogestrel, gestodene, and norgestimate. Am J Obstet Gynecol 160:1296–1300.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Speroff L, Decherney A (1993). The Advisory Board for the New Progestins. Evaluation of a new generation of oral contraceptives. Obstet Gynecol 81; 1034–1047.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Skouby SO, Petersen KR (1991). Clinical experience with the recently developed progestogens. Int J Fertil 6 (Suppl):32–37.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fotherby K (1991). Desogestrel and gestodene in oral contraception: A review of European experience. J Drug Dev 4:101–111.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gauthier A, Upmalis D, Dain M-P (1992). Clinical evaluation of a new triphasic oral contraceptive: Norgestimate and ethinyl estradiol. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 71(Suppl 156):27–32.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kafrissen ME (1992). A norgestimate containing oral contraceptive: Review of clinical studies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 167:1197–1202.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    London RS, Chapdelaine A, Upmalis D, et al (1992). Comparative contraceptive efficacy and mechanism of action of norgestimate-containing triphasic oral contraceptive. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 71(Suppl 156):9–14.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mattsson L-A, Cullberg G (1984). Clinical and metabolic effects of Marvelon: Scandinavian experience. Br J Fam Plann 10(Suppl):43–47.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Newton JR (1984). Studies with desogestrel for fertility regulation. In: Harrison RF, Bonnar J, Thompson W (eds.), Fertility and Sterility, the Proceeding of the 11th World Congress on Fertility and Sterility, (Dublin June 1983). Lancaster: MTP Press, pp. 663–671.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Weijers MJ (1982). Clinical trial of an oral contraceptive containing desogestrel and ethinyl estradiol. Clin Ther 4:359–366.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bilotta P, Favilli S (1988). Clinical evaluation of a monophasic ethinylestra-diol/desogestrel-containing oral contraceptive. Arzneim-Forsch/Drug Res 38:932–934.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lachnit-Fixson U, Aydinlik S, Lehnert J (1984). Clinical comparison between a monophasic preparation and a triphasic preparation. In: Harrison RF, Bonnar J, Thompson W (eds). Fertility and Sterility; the Proceeding of the 11th World Congress on Fertility and Sterility. Dublin, June 1983, Lancaster, MTP, pp. 595–603.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gaspard UJ, Romus MA, Gillain D, et al (1983). Plasma hormone levels in women receiving new oral contraceptives containing ethinyl estradiol plus levonorgestrel or desogestrel. Contraception 17:577–590.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Spona J, Huber J (1987). Efficacy of low-dose oral contraceptives containing levonorgestrel, gestodene and cyproterone acetate. Gynecol Obstet Invest 23:184–193.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rabe T, Runnebaum B, Kohlmeier, et al (1987). Clinical and metabolic effects of gestodene and levonorgestrel. Int J Fertil 32 (Suppl):29–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Loudon NB, Kirkman RJE, Dewsbury JA (1990). A double-blind comparison of efficacy and acceptability of Femodene and Microgynon-30. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Bio 34:257–266.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kuhl H, Gahn G, Romberg G, et al (1985). A randomized cross-over comparison of two low-dose oral contraceptives upon hormonal and metabolic serum parameters: I. Effects upon sexual hormone levels. Contraception 31:583–593.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Dieben T (1984). A comparative study of the clinical efficacy of Marvelon and a triphasic combination. Organorama 21:1–4.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Cullberg G, Samsioe G, Andersen RF, et al (1982). Two oral contraceptives, efficacy, serum proteins and lipid metabolism. Contraception 26:229–243.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ball MJ, Ashwell E, Jackson M, et al (1990). Comparison of two triphasic contraceptives with different progestogens: Effects on metabolism and coagulation proteins. Contraception 41:363–375.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Refn H, Kjaer A, Lebech A-M, et al (1990). Metabolic changes during treatment with two different progestogens. Am J Obstet Gynecol 163:374–377.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Janaud A, Rouffy J, Upmalis D, et al (1992). A comparison study of lipid and androgen metabolism with triphasic oral contraceptive formulations containing norgestimate or levonorgestrel. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand (Suppl 156): 33–38.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Corson SL (1990). Efficacy and clinical profile of a new oral contraceptive containing norgestimate. A eta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl 152:25–31.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Vessey MP (1980). Female hormones and vascular disease: An epidemiological overview. Br J Farn Plann Suppl. 6:1–12.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Royal College of General Practitioners’ Oral Contraceptive Study (1981). Further analysis of mortality in oral contraceptive users. Lancet i:541–543.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Stadel BV (1981). Oral contraceptives and cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med 305:612–618, 672–677.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Heimlich SP, Rosenberg L, Kaufman DW, et al (1987). Venous thromboembolism in relation to oral contraceptive use. Obstet Gynecol 4 (69):91–95.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Bottiger LE, Boman G, Eklund G, et al (1980). Oral contraceptives and thromboembolic disease: Effects of lowering oestrogen content. Lancet 1:1097–1101.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Sabra A, Bonnar J (1983). Haemostatic system changes induced by 50 ug and 30 ug estrogen/progestogen oral contraceptives. J Reprod Med 28:85–87.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ulysse JG (1986). Metabolic effects of oral contraceptives. Am J Obstet Gynecol 157(Suppl, part III):1009–1014.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Vekemans M, Grippa J, Capel P, et al (1987). The effect of two low-dose contraceptives containing ethinylestradiol and desogestrel or D-norgestrel on blood clotting factors. Curr Ther Res 42:1109–1118.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Omsjo IH, Oian P, Maltau JM, et al (1989). Effects of two triphasic oral contraceptives containing ethinylestradiol plus levonorgestrel or gestodene on blood coagulation and fibrinolysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 68:27–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Bonnar J (1987). Coagulation effects of oral contraception. Am J Obstet Gynecol 157:1042–1048.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Bonnar J, Daly L, Carroll E (1987). Blood coagulation with a combination pill containing gestodene and ethinyl estradiol. Int J Fertil 32(Suppl):21–28.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    David JL, Gaspard UJ, Gillain D, et al (1990). Hemostasis profile in women taking low-dose oral contraceptives. Am J Obstet Gynecol 163:420–423.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Melis GB, Fruzzetti F, Nicoletti I, et al (1992). A comparative study on the effects of a monophasic pill containing desogestrel plus 20 ug ethinylestradiol, a triphasic combination containing levonorgestrel and a monophasic combination containing gestodene on coagulatory factors. Contraception 43:23–31.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Kjae A, Lebech A-M, Borggaard B, et al (1989). Lipid metabolism and coagulation of two contraceptives: Correlation to serum concentrations of levonorgestrel and gestodene. Contraception 40:665–673.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Poultrer NR, Chang CL, Parley TMM et al (1995). Venous thromboembolic disease and combined oral contraceptives: Results of international multicentre case-control study. Lancet 346:1575–1582.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Parley TMM, Melrik O, Chang CL et al (1995). Effect of different progestagens in low estrogen oral contraceptives on venous thromboembolic risks. Lancet 346:1582–1588.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Jick H, Jick SS, Gurewich V et al (1995). Risk of idiopathic cardiovascular death and nonfatal venous thromboembolism in women using oral contraceptives with differing progestagen components. Lancet 346:1589–1593.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Spitzer WO, Lewis MA, Heinemann LAJ, et al (1996) Third generation oral contraceptives and risk of venous thromboembolic disorders: An international case-control study. BMJ 312:83–88.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Lewis MA, Spitzer WO, Heinemann LAJ, et al (1996). Third generation oral contraceptives and risk of myocardial infarction: An international case-control study. BMJ 312:88–91.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Speroff L (1995). Uproar in Europe over desogestrel and gestodene. Ob/Gyn Clinical Alert December:62–64.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Anger: Cilag Medoc NRG 05301. Quoted in: Becker H (1990). Supportive European data on a new oral contraceptive containing norgestimate. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 69(Suppl 152):33–39.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Winkler UH, Oberhoff C, Bier U, et al (1995). Hemostatic effects of two oral contraceptives containing low doses of ethinyl estradiol and either gestodene or norgestimate: An open randomized, parallel-group study. Int J Fertil 40:260–268.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    David JL (1995). Impact of hemostasis parameters of noresetimate (NGM) or desogestrel (DSG) associated to low-doses of ethinyl estradiol (EE) in monophasic oral contraceptives. (Abstract) Int Fed Steril Montpelier, France, September 18–23.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Rabe T, Grunwald K, Runnebaum B (1988). Oral hormonal contraceptives and lipid metabolism. I. Lipid metabolism, cholesterol and triglycerides. Fertilitaet 4:35–51.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Rabe T, Grunwald K, Runnebaum B (1989). Oral hormonal contraceptives and lipid metabolism. II. Lipoproteins and apolipoprotein. Fertilitaet 5:80–91.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Fotherby K (1985). Oral contraceptives, lipids and cardiovascular disease. Contraception 31:376–394.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Fotherby K (1990). Update on lipid metabolism and oral contraception. Br J Farn Plann 15(Suppl):23–36.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Chapdelaine A, Desmarais J-L, Derman RJ (1989). Clinical evidence of the minimal androgenic activity of norgestimate. Int J Fertil 34:347–352.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Corson SL (1990). Efficacy and clinical profile of a new oral contraceptive containing norgestimate. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 69(Suppl 152):25–31.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Bringer J (1992). Norgestimate: A clinical overview of a new progestin. Am J Obstet Gynecol 66:1969–1977.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Runnebaum B, Grunwald K, Rabe T (1992). The efficacy and tolerability of norgestimate/ethinyl estradiol (250mcg of norgestimate/35mcg of ethinyl estradiol): Results of an open, multicenter study of 59,701 women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 166:1963–1968.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Bergink EW, Vorglin NE, Klottrup P, et al (1982). Effects of desogestrel and levonorgestrel in low-dose oestrogen oral contraceptives on serum lipoproteins. Contraception 25:477–85.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Bergink EW, Kloosterboer HJ, Lund, et al (1984). Effects of levonorgestrel an desogestrel in low-dose oral contraceptive combinations on serum lipids, apolipoprotein A-I and B and glycosylated proteins. Contraception 30:61–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Bergink EW, Kloosterboer HJ (1984). Effects of oral contraceptives on lipoprotein metabolism: Studies of low-dose formulations. In: Society for the Advancement of Contraception (ed.). 2nd Annual Meeting, Scientific and Medical Conference.22; Jakarta, November, Chicago, S.A.C. p. 317–318, Abstract No. 30.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Crona N, Silfverstolpe G, Samsioe G (1983). The effects of desogestrel and levonorgestrel on lipids and lipoproteins (Abstract No. 108). Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl 116:67.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Crona N, Silfverstolpe G, Samsioe G (1984). Changes in serum apolipoprotein A-I and sex-hormone-binding globulin levels after treatment with two different progestins administered alone and in combination with ethinyl estradiol. Contraception 29:261–270.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Crona N, Silfverstolpe G, Samsioe G (1985). The effects of two gonane progestins alone and in combination with ethinyl estradiol on serum lipoproteins. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 19:365–374.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Kauppien-Makelin R, Kuusi T, Ylikorkala O, et al (1992). Contraceptives containing desogestrel or levonorgestrel have different effects on serum lipoproteins and post-heparin plasma lipase activities. Clin Endocrinol 36:203–209.Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Runnebaum B, Rabe T (1987). New progestins in oral contraceptives. Am J Obstet Gynecol 157:1059–1063.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Bertolini S, Elicio N, Cordera R, et al (1987). Effects of three low-dose oral contraceptive formulations on lipid metabolism. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 66:327–332.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Miccoli R, Orlandi MC, Fruzzetti F, et al (1989). Metabolic effects of three new low-dose pills: A six-month experience. Contraception 39:643–652.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Kuhl H, Marz W, Jung-Hoffman C, et al (1990). Time-dependent alterations in lipid metabolism during treatment with low-dose oral contraceptives. Am J Gynecol 163:363–369.Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Petersen KR, Skouby SO, Pedersen RG (1991). Desogestrel and gestodene in oral contraceptives: 12 months’ assessment of carbohydrate and lipoprotein metabolism. Obstet Gynecol 78:666–672.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Lepot M, Gaspard U (1987). Metabolic effects of two low-dose triphasic oral contraceptives containing ethinyl estradiol and levonorgestrel or gestodene. Int J Fertil (Suppl 32) 15–20.Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Reaven GM (1988). Role of insulin resistance in human disease. Diabetes 37:1595–1607.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Wynn V, Adams P, Godsland IF, et al (1979). Comparison of effects of different combined oral-contraceptive formulations on carbohydrate and lipid metabolism. Lancet 1:1045–1049.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Simon D, Senan C, Gamier P, et al (1990). Effects of oral contraceptives on carbohydrate and lipid metabolism in a healthy population: The Telecom Study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 163:382–387.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Rabe T, Grunwald K, Runnebaum B (1988). Oral hormonal contraceptives and carbohydrate metabolism. Fertilitaet 4:97–111.Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Briggs MH (1979). Biochemical basis for the selection of oral contraceptives. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 16:509–517.Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Spellacy WN, Buhi WC, Birk SA (1972) The effect of estrogens on carbohydrate metabolism: Glucose, insulin, and growth hormone studies on one hundred and seventy-one women ingesting Premarin, mestranol, and ethinyl estradiol for six months. Am J Obstet Gynecol 114:378–392.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Spellacy WN, Buhi WC, Birk SA (1975). Effects of norethindrone on carbohydrate and lipid metabolism. Obstet Gynecol 46:561–563.Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Spellacy WN, Buhi WC, Birk SA (1976). Carbohydrate and lipid metabolic studies before and after one year of treatment with ethynodiol diacetate in “normal” women. Fertil Steril 27:901–904.Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Spellacy WN, Buhi WC, Birk SA (1981). Prospective studies on carbohydrate metabolism in “normal” women using norgestrel for eighteen months. Fertil Steril 35:167–171.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Burkman RT, Kafrissen ME, Olson W, et al (1992). Lipid and carbohydrate effects of a new triphasic oral contraceptive containing norgestimate. Acta Obstet Scand 71 (Suppl 156):5–8.Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Becker H (1990) Supportive European data on a new oral contraceptive containing norgestimate. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 69(Suppl 152):33–39.Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Corson SL (1990) Efficacy and clinical profile of a new oral contraceptive containing norgestimate. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 69(Suppl 152):25–31.Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Huber J (1991). Clinical experience with a new norgestimate-containing oral contraceptive. Int J Fertil 1991;36:25–31.Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Kuhl H, Gahn G, Romberg G, et al (1985). A randomized cross-over comparison of two low-dose oral contraceptives upon hormonal and metabolic serum parameters: II. Effects upon thyroid function, gastrin, STH, and glucose tolerance. Contraception 32:97–107.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Barsivala VM, Virkar K, Kulkarni RD (1976). Carbohydrate metabolism of Indian women taking steroid contraceptives. Fertil Steril 27:87–91.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Spellacy WN (1982). Carbohydrate metabolism during treatment with estrogen, progestogen, and low-dose oral contraceptives. Am J Obstet Gynecol 142:732–734.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Luyckx AS, Gaspard UJ, Romus MA, et al (1986). Carbohydrate metabolism in women who used oral contraceptives containing levonorgestrel or desogestrel: A 6-month prospective study. Fertil Steril 45:635–642.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    van der Vange N, Kloosterboer HJ, Haspels A A (1987). Effect of seven low-dose combined oral contraceptive preparations on carbohydrate metabolism. Am J Obstet Gynecol 156:918–922.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Godsland IF, Crook D, Simpson R, et al (1990). The effects of different formulations of oral contraceptive agents on lipid and carbohydrate metabolism. N Engl J Med 323:1375–1381.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Polonsky K, Frank B, Pugh W, et al (1986). The limitations to and valid us C-peptide as a marker of the secretion of insulin. Diabetes 35:379–386.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    van Kammen E, Thijssen JHH, Rademaker B, et al (1975). The influence of hormonal contraceptives on sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) capacity. Contraception 11:53–59.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Briggs MH (1975). Hormonal contraceptives and plasma sex-hormone binding globulin. Contraception 12:149–153.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Bergink EW, Wolf DL, Wittliff JL, et al (1976). Testosterone-estradiol-binding globulin in patients with Turner’s syndrome: Effects of estrogens and acute growth hormone administration. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 42:1018–1023.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Lutz RA, Marki HH, Weder HG (1977). Die Androgenbindung immenschlichen Plasma und ihre physiologische Bedeutung. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 15:57–67.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Schwartz U, Hammerstein J (1974). The oestrogenic potency of various contraceptive steroids as determined by their effects on transcortin-binding capacity. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh) 76:159–171.Google Scholar
  104. 104.
    Briggs MH, Briggs M (1971). Effects of oral ethinyloestradiol on serum proteins in women. Contraception 3:381–386.Google Scholar
  105. 105.
    Anderson DC (1974). Sex-hormone-binding-globulin. Clin Endocrinol 3:69–96.Google Scholar
  106. 106.
    El Makhzangy MN, Wynn V, Lawrence DM (1979). Sex hormone binding globulin capacity as an index of oestrogenicity or androgenicity in women on oral contraceptive steroids. Clin Endocrinol 10:30–45.Google Scholar
  107. 107.
    Bergink EW, Holma P, Pyorala T (1981). Effects of oral contraceptive combinations containing levonorgestrel or desogestrel on serum proteins and androgen binding. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 41:663–668.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Hammond GL, Landley MS, Robinson PA, et al (1984). Serum steroid binding protein concentrations, distribution of progestogens, and bioavailability of testosterone during treatment with contraceptives containing desogestrel or levonorgestrel. Fert Steril 42:44–51.Google Scholar
  109. 109.
    Swinkels LMJW, Meulenberg PMM, Ross HA, et al (1988). Salivary and plasma free testosterone and androstenedione levels in women using oral contraceptives containing desogestrel or levonorgestrel. Ann Clin Biochem 25:354–359.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Nilsson B, von Schoultz B (1989). Binding of levonorgestrel, norethisterone and desogestrel to human sex hormone binding globulin and influence on free testosterone levels. Gynecol Obstet Invest 27:151–154.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Phillips A, Demarest K, Hahn DW, et al(1990). Progestational and androgenic receptor affinities and in vivo activities of norgestimate and other progestins. Contraception 41:399–410, 1990.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    Hahn DW, Foldesy R, McGuire Jl, et al (1985). Influence of norgestimate and levonorestrel on SHBG. Arch Gynecol 237:332.Google Scholar
  113. 113.
    Liukko P, Erkkola R, Bergink W (1983). Differing effects of two oral contraceptives on serum SHBG and androgen levels. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 116(Suppl):67–68, Abstract No. 109.Google Scholar
  114. 114.
    Palatsi R, Hirvensalo E, Liukko P, et al (1984). Serum total and unbound testosterone and sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) in female acne patients treated with two different oral contraceptives. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 64:517–523.Google Scholar
  115. 115.
    Calaf J, Leenti O, Cornellana MJ, et al (1985). Effects of two contraceptive preparations on the androgenic profile. Adv Contracep 1:225 (Abstract No. 41).Google Scholar
  116. 116.
    Mayer HO, Kostner G, Tscherne G, et al (1988). Vergleich des Einflusses eines Desogestrel-brz. Levonorgestrelhaltigen Kombinationsprararates auf Lipid-Stoffwechsel, Serumtestosteron und SHBG. Fertilitaet 4:173–178.Google Scholar
  117. 117.
    Liukko P, Erkkola R, Bergink EW (1988). Progestagen-dependent effect on some plasma proteins during oral contraception. Gynecol Obstet Invest 25:118–122.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  118. 118.
    van der Vange N, Blankenstein MA, Kloosterboer HJ, et al (1990). Effects of seven low-dose combined oral contraceptives on sex hormone binding globulin, corticosteroid binding globulin, total and free testosterone. Contraception 41:345–352.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  119. 119.
    Coenen CMH, Thomas CMG, Borm GF, et al (1995). Comparative evaluation of the androgenicity of four low-dose, fixed-combination oral contraceptives. Int J Fertil 40:(Suppl 2):92–97.Google Scholar
  120. 120.
    Miller NE. Association of high-density lipoprotein subclasses and apolipoprotein with ischemic heart disease and coronary atherosclerosis. Am Heart J 113:589–597, 1987.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  121. 121.
    Hollenbeck C, Reaven GM (1987). Variations in insulin-stimulated glucose uptake in healthy individuals with normal glucose tolerance. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 64:1169–1173.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  122. 122.
    Strauss JS, Pocchi PE (1963). Effect of Enovid on sebum production in females: A preliminary report. Arch Dermatol 97:366–368.Google Scholar
  123. 123.
    Pye RJ, Meynick G, Pye MJ, et al (1977). Effect of oral contraceptive on sebum excretion rate. BMJ 11:1581–1582.Google Scholar
  124. 124.
    Pocchi PE. Commentary (1982). Androgen effects of human sebaceous glands. Arch Dermatol 118:803–804.Google Scholar
  125. 125.
    Speroff L (ed) (1994). Highlights of the XIV FIGO World Congress AM Medica Communications Ltd. NY, pp. 1–19.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Birkhäuser Boston 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas H. Schwend
    • 1
  • Joel S. Lippman
    • 1
  1. 1.Ortho PharmaceuticalsRaritanUSA

Personalised recommendations