Advertisement

The Effects of Management Systems on Ground-Foraging Ant Diversity in Costa Rica

  • Dana S. Roth
  • Ivette Perfecto
  • Beverly Rathcke

Abstract

The loss of biological diversity is an ecological crisis of profound and universal impact (Wilson 1988). Most of this loss is occurring in tropical regions as a result of conversion of forest to agriculture and pasture (Myers 1984). The “traditional” solution to reduce loss of species has been to establish national parks and other protected areas and attempt to exclude local populations of people from them. While these pristine parks are critical to protecting many species that cannot survive habitat modification, small islands of pristine forest may not be optimal for the protection of many species on a long-term basis, particularly if they are surrounded by huge expanses of disturbed habitats that restrict migration (Lovejoy et al. 1986, Bierregaard et al. 1992, but see Wu et al. 1993).

Keywords

Primary Forest Cacao Plantation Productive Cacao Primary Forest Site Tuna Bait 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andersen, A. N. 1992. Regulation of “momentary” diversity by dominant species in exceptionally rich ant communities of the Australian seasonal tropics. American Naturalist 140:401–420.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beattie, A. J. 1985. The evolutionary ecology of ant-plant mutualisms. Cambridge University Press, New York, New York, USA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beattie, A. J., and D. C. Culver. 1982. Inhumation: how ants and other invertebrates help seeds. Nature 297:627.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bierregaard, R. O., Jr., T. E. Lovejoy, V. Kapos, A. A. dos Santos, and R. W. Hutchings. 1992. The biological dynamics of tropical rainforest fragments: a prospective comparison of fragments and continuous forest. BioScience 42:859–866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bond, W., and P. Slingsby. 1984. Collapse of an ant-plant mutualism: the Argentine ant (Iridomyrmex humilis) and myrmecochorous Proteaceae. Ecology 65:1031–1037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boucher, D. H., M. Hansen, S. Risch, and J. H. Vandermeer. 1983. Agriculture. Pages 66–73 in D. H. Janzen, editor. Costa Rican natural history. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA.Google Scholar
  7. Carroll, C. R. 1983. Azteca (Hormiga Azteca, Azteca ants, Cecropia ants). Pages 691–693 in D.H. Janzen, editor. Costa Rican natural history. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA.Google Scholar
  8. Carroll, C. R., and D. H. Janzen. 1973. Ecology of foraging by ants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 4:231–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Castro, A. G., M. V. B. Quieroz, and L. M. Araújo. 1990. O papel do distúrbio na estructura de comunidades de formigas (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Revista Brasileira Entomologia 34(1): 201–213.Google Scholar
  10. Clark, D. B. 1990. La Selva Biological Station: a blueprint for stimulating tropical research. Pages 9–27 in A. Gentry, editor. Four neotropical rainforests. Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.Google Scholar
  11. Colwell, R. K., and M. A. Huston. 1991. Conceptual framework and research issues for species diversity at the community level. Pages 37–71 in O. T. Solbrig, editor. From genes to ecosystems: a research agenda for biodiversity. International Union of Biological Sciences, Paris, France.Google Scholar
  12. Connell, J. H. 1978. Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs. Science 199(24 March): 1302–1310.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Connor, E. F., and E. D. McCoy. 1979. The statistics and biology of the species-area relationship. American Naturalist 113:791–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Davidson, D. W., J. T. Longino, and R. R. Snelling. 1978. Pruning of host plant neighbors by ants: an experimental approach. Ecology 69:801–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. De Kock, A. E., J. H. Giliomee, K. L. Pringle, and J. D. Majer. 1992. The influence of fire, vegetation age and Argentine ants (Iridomyrmex humilis) on ant communities in Swartboskloof. Pages 203–215 in B. W. van Wilgen, D. M. Richardson, E. J. Kruger, and H. J. van Hensbergen, editors. Fire in South African mountain fynbos: ecosystem, community, and species response of Swartboskloof. Ecological Studies 93. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar
  16. Denslow, J. S. 1985. Disturbance-mediated coexistence of species. Pages 307–323 in S. T. A. Pickett and P. S. White, editors. The ecology of natural disturbance and patch dynamics. Academic Press, Tallahassee, Florida, USA.Google Scholar
  17. Haering, R., and B. J. Fox. 1987. Short-term coexistence and long-term competitive displacement of two dominant species of Iridomyrmex: the successional response of ants to regenerating habitats. Journal of Animal Ecology 56:495–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hansson, L. 1991. Dispersal and connectivity in metapopulations. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 42:89–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Harris, L., and J. Eisenberg. 1989. Enhanced linkages: necessary steps for success in conservation of faunal diversity. Pages 166–181 in D. Western and M. C. Pearl, editors. Conservation for the twenty-first century. Oxford University Press, New York, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  20. Hartshorn, G. S. 1983. Plants. Pages 118–183 in D. H. Janzen, editor. Costa Rican natural history. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA.Google Scholar
  21. Heinen, J. T. 1992. Comparisons of the leaflitter herpetofauna in abandoned cacao plantations and primary rain forest in Costa Rica: some implications for faunal restoration. Biotropica 24:431–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hölldobler, B., and E. O. Wilson. 1990. The ants. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.Google Scholar
  23. Holloway, J. D., and N. E. Stork. 1991. The dimensions of biodiversity: the use of invertebrates as indicators of human impact. Pages 37–62 in D. L. Hawksworth, editor. The biodiversity of microorganisms and invertebrates: its role in sustainable agriculture. C. A. B. International, Wallingford, U.K.Google Scholar
  24. Huxley, C. 1980. Symbiosis between ants and epiphytes. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 55:321–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jackson, D. A. 1984. Ant distribution patterns in a Cameroonian cocoa plantation: investigation of the ant mosaic hypothesis. Oecologia (Berlin) 62:318–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Janzen, D. H., editor. 1983. Costa Rican natural history. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA.Google Scholar
  27. Johns, A. D. 1985. Selective logging and wildlife conservation in tropical rain-forest: problems and recommendations. Biological Conservation 31:355–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Klein, B. 1989. Effects of forest fragmentation on dung and carrion beetle communities in central Amazonia. Ecology 70:1715–1725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kleinfeldt, S. E. 1978. Ant-gardens: the interaction of Codonanthe crassifolia (Gesneriaceae) and Crematogaster longispina (Formicidae). Ecology 59:449–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Krebs, C. J. 1989. Ecological methodology. Harper and Row, New York, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  31. Lal, R. 1988. Effects of macrofauna on soil properties in tropical ecosystems. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 24:101–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lévieux, J., and T. Diomande. 1985. Évolution des peuplements de fourmis terricoles selon l’age de la végétation dans une forêt de Cote d’Ivoire intacte ou soumise a l’action humaine. Insectes Sociaux 32(2):128–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Levings, S. C. 1983. Seasonal, annual, and among-site variation in the ground ant community of a deciduous tropical forest: some causes of patchy species distributions. Ecological Monographs 53:435–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Levings, S. C., and N. R. Franks. 1982. Patterns of nest dispersion in a tropical ground ant community. Ecology 63:338–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lovejoy, T. E., R. O. Bierregaard, Jr., A. B. Rylands, J. R. Malcolm, C. E. Quintela, L. H. Harper, K. S. Brown, Jr., A. H. Powell, G. V. N. Powell, H. O. R. Schubart, and M. B. Hays. 1986. Edge and other effects of isolation on Amazon forest fragments. Pages 257–285 in M. E. Soulé, editor. Conservation biology: the science of scarcity and diversity. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.Google Scholar
  36. Lynch, J. F., A. R. Johnson, and E. C. Balinsky. 1988. Spatial and temporal variation in the abundance and diversity of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in the soil and litter layers of a Maryland forest. American Midland Naturalist 119:31–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Magurran, A. E. 1988. Ecological diversity and its measurement. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.Google Scholar
  38. Majer, J. D. 1972. The ant mosaic in Ghana cocoa farms. Bulletin of Entomological Research 62:151–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Majer, J. D. 1990. Rehabilitation of disturbed land: long-term prospects for the recolonization of fauna. Proceedings of the Ecological Society of Australia 16:509–519.Google Scholar
  40. Majer, J. D., and P. Camer-Pesci. 1991. Ant species in tropical Australian tree crops and native ecosystems—is there a mosaic? Biotropica 23(2): 173–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McNeely, J. A. 1989. Protected areas and human ecology: how national parks can contribute to sustaining societies in the twenty-first century. Pages 150–157 in D. Western and M. C. Pearl, editors. Conservation for the twenty-first century. Oxford University Press, New York, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  42. Myers, N. 1984. The primary source: tropical forests and our future. W. W. Norton, New York, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  43. Nestel, D., and F. Dickschen. 1990. The foraging kinetics of ground ant communities in different Mexican coffee agroecosy stems. Oecologia 84:58–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Neumann, F. G. 1991. Responses of litter arthropods to major natural or artificial ecological disturbances in mountain ash forest. Australian Journal of Ecology 16:19–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Perfect, T. J. 1991. Biodiversity and tropical pest management. Pages 145–148 in D. L. Hawksworth, editor. The biodiversity of microorganisms and invertebrates: its role in sustainable agriculture. C.A.B. International, Wallingford, U.K.Google Scholar
  46. Perfecto, I. 1990. Indirect and direct effects in a tropical agroecosystem: the maize-pest-ant system in Nicaragua. Ecology 71:2125–2134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Perfecto, I. 1991a. Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) as natural control agents of pests in irrigated maize in Nicaragua. Journal of Economic Entomology 84(1):65–70.Google Scholar
  48. Perfecto, I. 1991b. Dynamics of Solenopsis geminata in a tropical fallow field after ploughing. Oikos (Copenhagen) 62:139–144.Google Scholar
  49. Perfecto, I., and A. Sediles. 1992. Vegetational diversity, ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), and herbivorous pests in a neotropical agroecosystem. Environmental Entomology 21(l):61–67.Google Scholar
  50. Pimentel, D., U. Stachow, D. A. Takacs, H. W. Brubaker, A. R. Dumas, J. J. Meaney, J. A. S. O’Neill, D. E. Onsi, and D. B. Corzilius. 1992. Conserving biological diversity in agricultural/forestry systems: most biological diversity exists in human-managed ecosystems. BioScience 42: 354–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Risch, S. J., D. Pimentel, and H. Grover. 1986. Corn monoculture versus old field: effects of low levels of insecticides. Ecology 67:505–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Roberts, J. T., and E. R. Heithaus. 1986. Ants rearrange the vertebrate-generated seed shadow of a neotropical fig tree. Ecology 67:1046–1051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Room, P. M. 1975. Relative distributions of ant species in cocoa plantations in Papua New Guinea. Journal of Applied Ecology 12:47–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Samways, M. J. 1983. Community structure of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in a series of habitats associated with citrus. Journal of Applied Ecology 20:833–847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Samways, M. J. 1984. A practical comparison of diversity indices based on a series of small agricultural ant communities. Phytophylactica 16:275–278.Google Scholar
  56. SAS/STAT. 1990. Version 6, Fourth edition. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA.Google Scholar
  57. Southwood, T. R. E. 1987. Diversity, species packing and habitat description. Pages 420–455 in Ecological methods with particular reference to the study of insect populations. Chapman and Hall, Cambridge, U.K.Google Scholar
  58. Southwood, T. R. E., V. K. Brown, and P. M. Reader. 1979. The relationships of plant and insect diversities in succession. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 12:327–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Stout, J., and J. H. Vandermeer. 1975. Comparison of species-richness for stream-inhabiting insects in tropical and mid-latitude streams. American Naturalist 109:263–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Torres, J. A. 1984a. Diversity and distribution of ant communities in Puerto Rico. Biotropica 16(4): 296–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Torres, J. A. 1984b. Niches and coexistence of ant communities in Puerto Rico: repeated patterns. Biotropica 16(4):284–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Waage, J. K. 1991. Biodiversity as a resource for biological control. Pages 149–163 in D. L. Hawks-worth, editor. The biodiversity of microorganisms and invertebrates: its role in sustainable agriculture. C.A.B. International, Wallingford, U.K.Google Scholar
  63. Wilson, E. O. 1987. The arboreal ant fauna of Peruvian Amazon forests: a first assessment. Biotropica 19(3):245–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wilson, E. O., editor. 1988. Biodiversity. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., USA.Google Scholar
  65. Wilson, E. O. 1992. The effects of complex social life on evolution and biodiversity. Oikos 63(1): 13–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wilson, W. L., and A. D. Johns. 1982. Diversity and abundance of selected animal species in undisturbed forest, selectively logged forest and plantations in East Kalimantan, Indonesia. Biological Conservation 24:205–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wu, J., J. L. Vankat, and Y. Barlas. 1993. Effects of patch connectivity and arrangement on animal metapopulation dynamics: a simulation study. Ecological Modelling 65:221–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Magazines Ltd. 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dana S. Roth
  • Ivette Perfecto
  • Beverly Rathcke

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations