No Park Is an Island: Increase in Interference from Outside as Park Size Decreases
There is evident conservation value to numerous small habitat preserves (parks) when large protected areas are impractical (Simberloff 1982). However, such a management policy brings to mind a caution that is often unappreciated for parks and other forms of conserved pristine vegetation, and becomes ever more appropriate as park size decreases. The smaller the patch (island) of habitat that is viewed as pristine, the greater the effect of the surrounding secondary successional vegetation and croplands as a source of 1) animals and seeds that enter the park and interact with the residents, and 2) food subsidy for residents capable of foraging outside of the pristine forest.
KeywordsSecondary Succession Seed Rain Tree Fall Seed Shadow Pristine Forest
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Boza, M. A. and Mendoza, R. 1981. The national parks of Costa Rica. — INCAFO, S.A., Madrid, Spain.Google Scholar
- Fleming, T. H. and Heithaus, E. R. 1981. Frugivorous bats, seed shadows, and the structure of tropical forests. — Biotropica (supplement) 13:45–53.Google Scholar
- Foster, M. S. 1976. Nesting biology of the long-tailed manakin. — Wilson Bull. 88:400–420.Google Scholar
- Janzen, D. H. 1967. Interaction of the bull’s-horn acacia (Acacia cornigera L.) with an ant inhabitant (Pseudomyrmex ferruginea F. Smith) in eastern Mexico. — Univ. Kansas Sei. Bull. 47:315–558.Google Scholar
- Janzen, D. H. 1978. Seeding patterns of tropical trees. —In: Tomlinson, P. B. and Zimmerman, M. H. (eds), Tropical trees as living systems. Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, pp. 83–128.Google Scholar
- Janzen, D. H. and Liesner, R. 1980. Annotated check-list of plants of lowland Guanacaste Province, Costa Rica, exclusive of grasses and non-vascular cryptograms. — Brenesia 18:15–90.Google Scholar
- Keast, A. and Morton, E. S. (eds) 1980. Migrant birds in the Neotropics. — Smithsonian Inst. Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
- Simberloff, D. 1982. Big advantages of small refuges. — Natural History 91(4):6–14.Google Scholar