Skip to main content

The Meaning of Bell’s Theorem

  • Chapter
Book cover Paradox Lost
  • 173 Accesses

Abstract

Einstein’s insistence that, in any “reasonable” theory, whatever can be measured must have physical reality led him to the conclusion not that quantum mechanics was wrong but that it was incomplete. This led to the idea of “hidden variable” theories, that is, theories that satisfied his criteria and could be used to “explain” quantum phenomena. John Bell set out to derive specific consequences of any such theory. He derived a theorem—an inequality—that would have to be valid for it. Experiments undertaken to test this prediction showed that quantum mechanics violated the inequality. Aside from showing that quantum theory was not consistent with Einstein’s criteria, it appeared to show that hidden variable theories could not be valid.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 34.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abraham Pais, in his scientific biography of Einstein entitled Subtle Is the Lord (pp. 455–456, Oxford University Press, New York, 1982), quotes from the aforementioned paper of Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen: “We could not arrive at our conclusion if one insisted that two … physical quantities can be regarded as simultaneous elements of reality only when they can be simultaneously measured or predicted.… This [simultaneous predictability] makes the reality of [two complementary variables] depend upon the process of measurement carried out on the first system which does not affect the second system in any way. No reasonable definition of reality could be expected to permit this.”

    Google Scholar 

  2. J.C. Polkinghorne, The Quantum World, p. 73, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. Aspect, P. Grangier, and G. Roger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 91, 1982.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wallace, P.R. (1996). The Meaning of Bell’s Theorem. In: Paradox Lost. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4014-3_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4014-3_23

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-8468-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-4014-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics