Abstract
The twelve systems we have looked at all support selection problems, but they vary in the specific type of selection decision they were meant to support. This chapter compares the kinds of problems where each technique would be expected to have an advantage, and the kind of decision maker effort required. Techniques will be compared on the dimensions of:
-
Task Type
-
Task Dimensionality
-
Task Uniqueness
-
Decision Maker Cognitive Effort required
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Fischer, G.W. 1979. Utility models for multiple objective decisions: Do they accurately represent human preferences? Decision Sciences 10, 451–479.
Hobbs, B.F. 1986. What can we learn from experiments in multiobjective decision analysis? IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics SMC-16:3, 384–394.
Larichev, O.I. 1992. Cognitive validity in design of decision-aiding techniques. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis 1:3, 127–138.
Larichev, O.I., Moshkovich, H.M., Mechitov, A.I. and Olson, D.L. 1993. Experiments comparing qualitative approaches to rank ordering of multiattribute alternatives. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis 2:1, 5–26.
Vanderpooten, D. 1990. The interactive approach in MCDA: A technical framework and some basic conceptions. Mathematical and Computer Modelling 12, 1213–1220.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1996 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Olson, D.L. (1996). Comparisons. In: Decision Aids for Selection Problems. Springer Series in Operations Research. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3982-6_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3982-6_13
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-8459-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-3982-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive