The Method of Multiple Scales for Ordinary Differential Equations

  • J. Kevorkian
  • J. D. Cole
Part of the Applied Mathematical Sciences book series (AMS, volume 114)

Abstract

Various physical problems are characterized by the presence of a small disturbance which, because it is active over a long time, has a non-negligible cumulative effect. For example, the effect of a small damping force over many periods of oscillation is to produce a decay in the amplitude of an oscillator. A more interesting example having the same physical and mathematical features is that of the motion of a satellite around Earth. Here the dominant force is a spherically symmetric gravitational field. If this were the only force acting on the satellite, the motion would be periodic (for sufficiently low energies). The presence of a thin atmosphere, a slightly nonspherical Earth, a small moon, a distant sun, and so on, all produce small but cumulative effects which, after a sufficient number of orbits, drastically alter the nature of the motion.

Keywords

Mold Assure Peri Sine Reso 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 4.1.
    D.L. Bosley and J. Kevorkian, “On the asymptotic solution of non-Hamiltonian systems exhibiting sustained resonance,” Stud. Appl. Math., 98, 1995, pp. 83–130.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. 4.2.
    F.J. Bourland and R. Haberman, “The modulated phase shift for strongly nonlinear slowly varying, and weakly damped oscillators,” SIAM J. Appl. Math., 48, 1988, pp. 737–748.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 4.3.
    P.F. Byrd and M.D. Friedman, Handbook of Elliptic Integrals for Engineers and Scientists, 2nd edition, Spring-Verlag, New York, 1971.MATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.4.
    J. Cochran, A new approach to singular perturbation problems, Ph.D. Thesis, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 1962.Google Scholar
  5. 4.5.
    J.D. Cole and J. Kevorkian, “Uniformly valid asymptotic approximations for certain non-linear differential equations,” Proc. Internat. Sympos. Non-linear Differential Equations and Non-linear Mechanics., Academic Press, New York, 1963, pp. 113–120.Google Scholar
  6. 4.6.
    G. Contopoulos, “A third integral of motion in a galaxy,” Z. Astrophys., 49, 1960, p. 273.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 4.7.
    M.C. Eckstein and Y.Y. Shi, “Asymptotic solutions for orbital resonances due to the general geopotential,” Astron. J., 74, 1969, pp. 551–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 4.8.
    M.C. Eckstein, Y.Y. Shi, and J. Kevorkian, “Satellite motion for all inclinations around an oblate planet,” Proceedings of Symposium No. 25, International Astronomical Union, Academic Press, New York, 1966, pp. 291–332.Google Scholar
  9. 4.9.
    M.C. Eckstein, Y.Y. Shi, and J. Kevorkian, “Satellite motion for arbitrary eccentricity and inclination around the smaller primary in the restricted three-body problem,” Astron. J., 71, 1966, pp. 248–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 4.10.
    M.C. Eckstein, Y.Y. Shi, and J. Kevorkian, “Use of the energy integral to evaluate higher-order terms in the time history of satellite motion,” Astron. J., 71, 1966, pp. 301–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 4.11.
    A. Erdelyi, Asymptotic Expansions, Dover Publications, New York, 1956.MATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 4.12.
    B. Erdi, “The three-dimensional motion of trojan asteroids,” Celest. Mech., 18, 1978, pp. 141–161.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 4.13.
    G.I. Hori, “Nonlinear coupling of two harmonic oscillations,” Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn., 19, 1967, pp. 229–241.Google Scholar
  14. 4.14.
    H. Kabakow, A perturbation procedure for nonlinear oscillations, Ph.D. Thesis, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, 1968.Google Scholar
  15. 4.15.
    J. Kevorkian, “Perturbation techniques for oscillatory systems with slowly varying coefficients,” SIAM Rev., 29, 1987, pp. 391–461.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 4.16.
    J. Kevorkian, “Resonance in weakly nonlinear systems with slowly varying parameters,” Stud. Appl. Math., 62, 1980, pp. 23–67.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 4.17.
    J. Kevorkian, “The planar motion of a trojan asteroid,” Periodic Orbits, Stability, and Resonances, G.E.O. Giacaglia (Editor), D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, 1970, pp. 283–303.Google Scholar
  18. 4.18.
    J. Kevorkian, “The two variable expansion procedure for the approximate solution of certain nonlinear differential equation,” Lectures in Applied Mathematics, Vol. 7, Space Mathematics (J.B. Rosser, Ed.), American Mathematical Society, 1966, pp. 206–275.Google Scholar
  19. 4.19.
    J. Kevorkian, The uniformly valid asymptotic representation of the solutions of certain non-linear ordinary differential equations, Ph.D. Thesis, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, 1961.Google Scholar
  20. 4.20.
    J. Kevorkian and Y.P. Li, “Explicit approximations for strictly nonlinear oscillators with slowly varying parameters with applications to free-electron lasers,” Stud. Appl. Math., 78, 1988, pp. 111–165.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 4.21.
    N.M. Krylov and N.N. Bogoliubov, Introduction to Nonlinear Mechanics, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1957.Google Scholar
  22. 4.22.
    G.N. Kuzmak, “Asymptotic solutions of non-linear second order differential equations with variable coefficients,” Prikl. Math. Mech., 23, 1959, pp. 515–526. Also appears in English translation.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  23. 4.23.
    P.-S. Laplace, Mécanique Céleste, Translated by Nathaniel Bowditch, Vol. 1, Book II, Chap. 15, p. 517, Hillard, Gray, Little, and Wilkins, Boston, 1829.Google Scholar
  24. 4.24.
    W. Lick, “Two-variable expansions and singular perturbation problems,” SIAM J. Appl Math., 17, 1969, pp. 815–825.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 4.25.
    J.C. Luke, “A perturbation method for nonlinear dispersive wave problems,” Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, 292, 1966, pp. 403–412.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 4.26.
    J.J. Mahoney, “An expansion method for singular perturbation problems,” J. Australian Math. Soc, 2, 1962, pp. 440–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 4.27.
    J.A. Morrison, “Comparison of the modified method of averaging and the two variable expansion procedure,” SIAM Rev., 8, 1966, pp. 66–85.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 4.28.
    H. Poincaré, Les Methodes Nouvelles de la Mécanique Celeste, Vol. II, Dover, New York, 1957.Google Scholar
  29. 4.29.
    Lord Rayleigh, Theory of Sound, 2 Edition, Dover, New York, 1945.MATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 4.30.
    G. Sandri, “A new method of expansion in mathematical physics,” Nuovo Cimento, B36, 1965, pp. 67–93.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  31. 4.31.
    G.G. Stokes, “On the Theory of Oscillatory Waves,” Cambridge Trans., 8, 1847, pp. 441–473.Google Scholar
  32. 4.32.
    R. A. Struble, “A geometrical derivation of the satellite equation,” J. Math. Anal. Appl., 1, 1960, p. 300.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 4.33.
    M. Van Dyke, Perturbation Methods in Fluid Mechanics, Annotated Edition, Parabolic Press, Stanford, CA, 1975.MATHGoogle Scholar
  34. 4.34.
    G.B. Whitham, “Two-timing, variational principles and waves,” J. Fluid Mech., 44, 1970, pp. 373–395.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 4.35.
    E.T. Whittaker, Analytical Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, London and New York, 1904.MATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Kevorkian
    • 1
  • J. D. Cole
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Applied MathematicsUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA
  2. 2.Department of Mathematical SciencesRensselaer Polytechnic InstituteTroyUSA

Personalised recommendations