Some Results on Energy

  • Zoran R. Pop-Stojanovic
  • Murali Rao
Part of the Progress in Probability and Statistics book series (PRPR, volume 1)


The concept of energy we are dealing with here is a generalization of that dealt with in the classical theory. Although rightfully observed by P.A. Meyer in [4] p. 140, that such a generalization “loses delicacy as it gains generality”, we will try to add a few results which may somewhat simplify a way in dealing with this concept. To be more precise, in the literature dealing with concept of energy, the basic tools are Dirichlet spaces techniques [7] and the kernel theory, which are both natural offshoots of the classical theory. The symmetry of kernels plays the basic role there.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    R.M. BLUMENTHAL and R.K. GETOOR. Markov Processes and Potential Theory, Academic Press, New York, 1968.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    H. CARTAN. Théorie du potential newtoniani énergie, capacité, suites de potentials. Bull. Soc. Math. France 73, 74–106 (1945).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    L.L. HELMS. Introduction to Potential Theory. Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1969.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    P.A. MEYER. Probability and Potentials. Blaisdell, Waltham, 1966.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    C. DELLACHERIE and P.A. MEYER. Probabilités et Potentiel, Vol. II. Hermann, Paris, 1980.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    D. REVUZ. Measures associeés a fonctionnelles additives de Markov. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 148, 501–531 (1970).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    M.L. SILVERSTEIN. The sector condition implies that semipolar sets are quasi-polar. Z. Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie verw. Gebiete 41 (1977), 13–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Birkhäuser Boston 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zoran R. Pop-Stojanovic
    • 1
  • Murali Rao
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of MathematicsUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations