Summary
The asseveration that metaphor is woven into the fabric of the creative enterprise - scientific epistemology included - is so well established that it virtually defies impugnment. There is, for instance, a corpus of literature attesting to its ratiocinative significance (Bruner, 1962; Sacks, 1979) and the significant role it plays in scientific, among other epistemologies (MacCormac, 1976, 1983). In fact, it has been suggested that the provenance of consciousness itself is rooted in metaphor (Jaynes, 1976, 1986) and that it is essentially a “mental principle” (Gordon, 1961). Nonetheless, none of these analyses has been sufficiently systematic in their expatiation on metaphor as underwriting such a cognitive process. This paper proffers such an analysis based upon a conflation of Frye’s (1957) systematic treatment of symbols and metaphor and Jung’s analytical Psychology (de Laszlo, 1958). Although these seem to be disparate domains there is a natural confluence of theories here which serves to adumbrate the intuitionistic side of scientific epistemology, that is to say, the creativity underlying scientific discovery.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bruner, J. (1962). The conditions of creativity. In H. Gruber, G. Terrell, & M. Wertheimer (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to creative thinking (pp. 1–30 ). New York: Atherton Press.
Bunge, M. (1962). Intuition and science. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bywater, I. (1909). Aristotle on the art of poetry. London: Oxford University Press. Campbell, N. R. (1920). Physics, the elements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Campbell, N. R. (1920). Physics, the elements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
de Laszlo, V. S. (1958). Psyche and symbol: A selection from the writings of C. G. Jung. Garden City, NY: Doubleday and Company.
de Laszlo, V. S. (1959). The basic writings of C. G. Jung. New York: Modern Library.
Doppelt, G. (1983). Relativism and recent pragmatic conceptions of scientific, rationality. In N. Rescher (Ed.), Scientific explanation and understanding: Essays on reasoning and rationality in science (pp. 107–142 ). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
Dreyfus, H., & Dreyfus, S. (1986). Mind over machine. New York: Free Press.
Frye, N. (1957). Anatomy of criticism: Four essays. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Gardner, H. (1985). The mind’s new science: A history of the cognitive revolution. New York: Basic Books.
Gordon, W. J. J. (1961). Synectics: The development of creative capacity. New York: Harper & Row Publishers.
Gruber, H. E. (1981).Darwin on man: A psychological study of scientific creativity. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Heidegger, M. (1949). Existence and being. (W. Brock, Trans.) London: Vision Press. Jaynes, J. (1976). The origin of consciousness in the breakdown of the bicameral mind. Boston, MA: Houghton Miffl in Company.
J. (1976). The origin of consciousness in the breakdown of the bicameral mind. Boston, MA: Houghton Miffl in Company.
Jaynes, J. (1986). Consciousness and the voices of the mind. Canadian Psychology, 27 (2), 128–139.
Jung, C. G. (1969). Four archetypes: Mother/rebirth/spirit /trickster. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ( Originally published, 1959 ).
Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. ( Originally published, 1962 ).
Libby, W. (1922). The scientific imagination. Scientific Monthly, XV, 263–270
Lugg, A. (1985). The process of discovery. Philosophy of Science, 52(2), 207–220.
MacCormac, E. R. (1976). Metaphor and myth in science and religion. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
MacCormac, E. R. (1983). Scientific metaphors as necessary conceptual limitations of science. In N. Rescher (Ed.), The limits of lawfulness: Studies on the scope and nature of scientific knowledge (pp. 61–68 ). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
Maxwell, J. C. (1890). In D. Niven (Ed.), The scientific papers of James Clerk Maxwell. (Vol. 1 ). New York: Dover.
Medawar, P. B. (1969). Induction and intuition in scientific thought. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society.
Meynell, H. A. (1976). An introduction to the philosophy of Bernard Lonergan. London: The Macmillan Press Limited.
Mill, J. S. (1919). A system of logic: Ratiocinative and inductive. London: Longmans, Green & Company. (Originally published, 1843 ).
Nickles, T. (1985). Beyond divorce: Current status of the discovery debate. Philosophy of Science, 52(2), 177–206.
North, J. (1980). Science and analogy. In M. Grmek, R. Cohen, & G. Cimino (Eds.), On scientific discovery (pp. 115–140 ). Boston: D. Reidel.
Piaget, J. (1950). Introduction a l’epistemologie génétique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Quine, W. V. (1979). A postscript on metaphor. In S. Sacks (Ed.), On metaphor (pp. 159–160 ). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Reichenbach, H. (1938). Experience and prediction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rosenthal, R. (1976). Experimenter effects in behavioral research: Enlarged Edition. New York: Irvington Publishers, Inc.
Rothbart, D. (1986). Scientific unification through metaphor. In D. M. DeLuca (Ed.), Essays on creativity and science (pp. 163–166 ). Honolulu: Hawaii Council of Teachers of English.
Royce, J. R., Coward, H., Egan, E., Kessel, F., & Mos, L. (1978). Psychological epistemology: A critical review of the empirical literature and the theoretical issues. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 97, 265–353.
Sacks, S. (Ed.). (1979). On metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Searle, J. R. (1980). Mind, brains and programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, 417–457.
Shames, M. L. ( 1984, August). A systems model of analogical thought and transcendance. Paper presented at the First International Conference on Systems Research, Informatics and Cybernetics, Baden-Baden.
Shames, M. L. ( 1985a, February). On demarcation and the primacy of scientific epistemology. Invited address given to the McGill chapter of Sigma Xi, the Scientific Research Society, Montreal.
Shames, M. L. (1985b, August). Literary theory, analytical psychology and the scientific imagination. Paper delivered at the X VII International Congress of History of Science, University of California, Berkeley.
Shames, M. L. (1987). Methodocentricity, theoretical sterility, and the socio-behavioural sciences. In W. J. Baker, M. E. Hyland, H. van Rappard, & A. W. Staats (Eds.), Current issues in theoretical psychology (pp. 261–282). New York: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.
Simon, H. A. (1973). The organization of complex systems. In H. H. Pattee (Ed.), Hierarchy theory: The challenge of complex systems (pp. 1–27 ). New York: George Braziller.
Weitzenfeld, F. S. (1984). Valid reasoning by analogy. Philosophy of Science, 51(1), 137–149.
Worrall, J., & Currie, G. (Eds.). (1978). The methodology of scientific research programs: Philosophical papers, Volume 1, Imre Lakatos. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1988 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Shames, M.L. (1988). Scientific Epistemology: A Psycholiterary Approach. In: Baker, W.J., Mos, L.P., Rappard, H.V., Stam, H.J. (eds) Recent Trends in Theoretical Psychology. Recent Research in Psychology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3902-4_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3902-4_5
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-96757-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-3902-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive