Identification of Outliers

  • Albert Madansky
Part of the Springer Texts in Statistics book series (STS)

Abstract

One of the most vexing of problems in data analysis is the determination of whether or not to discard some observations because they are inconsistent with the rest of the observations and/or the probability distribution assumed to be the underlying distribution of the data. One direction of research activity related to this problem is that of the study of robust statistical procedures (cf. Huber [1981]), primarily procedures for estimating population parameters which are insensitive to the effect of “outliers”, i.e., observations inconsistent with the assumed model of the random process generating the observations. Typically, the robust procedure involves some “trimming” or down-weighting procedure, wherein some fraction of the extreme observations are automatically eliminated or given less weight to guard against the potential effect of outliers.

Keywords

Grinding 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barnett, V. and Lewis, T., 1978. Outliers in Statistical Data. New York: Wiley.MATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Beckman, R. J. and Cook, R. D. 1983. Outlier……….s. Technometrics 25 (May): 119–49.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Belsley, D. A., Kuh, E., and Welsch, R. E. 1980. Regression Diagnostics. New York: Wiley.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cook, R. D. 1977. Detection of influential observations in linear regression. Technometrics 19 (February): 15–18.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cook, R. D. 1979. Influential observations in linear regression. Journal of the American Statistical Association 74 (March): 169–74.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cook, R. D. and Weisberg, S. 1982. Residuals and Influence in Regression. New York: Chapman and Hall.MATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Ferguson, T. S. 1961a. On the rejection of outliers. In Proceedings of the Fourth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, Vol. 1, ed. J. Neyman. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 253–87.Google Scholar
  8. Ferguson, T. S. 1961b. Rules for rejection of outliers. Revue de l’Institut International de Statistique 29 (No. 3): 29–43.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Grubbs, F. E. 1950. Sample criteria for testing outlying observations. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 21 (March): 27–58.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hawkins, D. M. 1978. Fractiles of an extended multiple outlier test. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 8: 227–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hawkins, D. M. 1980. Identification of Outliers. New York: Chapman and Hall.MATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Huber, P. 1981. Robust Statistics. New York: Wiley.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Karlin, S. and Truax, D. R. 1960. Slippage problems. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 31 (June): 296–324.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kudo, A. 1956. On the testing of outlying observations. Sankhya 17 (June): 67–76.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. Murphy, R. B. 1951. On Tests for Outlying Observations. Ph. D. thesis, Princeton University. Ann Arbor: University Microfilms.Google Scholar
  16. Pearson, E. S. and Chandra Sekar, C. 1936. The efficiency of statistical tools and a criterion for the rejection of outlying observations. Biometrika 28: 308–20.MATHGoogle Scholar
  17. Pearson, E. S. and Stephens, M. A. 1964. The ratio of range to standard deviation in the same normal sample. Biometrika 51: 484–87.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. Rosner, B. 1975. On the detection of many outliers. Technometrics 17 (May): 221–27.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rosner, B. 1983. Percentage points for a generalized ESD many-outlier procedure. Technometrics 25 (May): 165–72.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Thompson, W. R. 1935. On a criterion for the rejection of observations and the distributions of the ratio of the deviation to the sample standard deviation. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 6: 214–19.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tietjen, G. L. and Moore, R. M. 1972. Some Grubbs-type statistics for the detection of several outliers. Technometrics 14 (August): 583–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Walsh, J. E. 1950. Some nonparametric tests of whether the largest observations of a set are too large or too small. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 21 (December): 583–92.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. (see also correction 1953 Annals of Mathematical Statistics 24 (March): 134–35).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Walsh, J. E. 1958. Large sample nonparametric rejection of outlying observations. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics 10: 223–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Weisberg, S. 1980. Applied Linear Regression. New York: Wiley.MATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Albert Madansky
    • 1
  1. 1.Graduate School of BusinessUniversity of ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations