Abstract
Donald Campbell privately distributed a paper in 1953 entitled “Designs for Social Science Experiments. ” It became the basis for a subsequent article (D.T. Campbell, 1957) in which the distinction between internal and external validity was first introduced to the psychological literature. That article was especially noteworthy for presenting in detail the formal logic whereby random assignment to conditions (e.g., treatment vs. control) made implausible some specific classes of threats to internal validity. Later this aspect of assignment arrangements, randomization, was used to distinguish “true experiments” from “quasi-experiments” (D.T. Campbell & Stanley, 1963). Indeed, the special relationship of randomization to internal validity was given such prominence that the term experiment was taken to mean a randomized experiment unless otherwise noted—a convention we follow in this chapter.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1988 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Greenberg, J., Folger, R. (1988). Experiments Versus Quasi-experiments. In: Controversial Issues in Social Research Methods. Springer Series in Social Psychology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3756-3_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3756-3_5
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-8336-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-3756-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive