Abstract
I am pleased to comment on the paper of Ms. Andrews. Although I will take a significantly different approach than hers, we are all indebted to her for attempting what may be an impossible task, i.e., giving the feminist perspective on the new reproductive technologies. There are a number of “feminist perspectives” on these highly emotional and personal issues. I see my primary task here as presenting an alternative one.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes and References
A more detailed discussion is contained in chapter 9, “Noncoital Reproduction” in Elias, S. and Annas, G. J., Reproductive Genetics and the Law (1987), and Elias and Annas, Social Policy Considerations in Noncoital Reproduction, Journal of the American Medical Association, 1986; 255:61–68.
For a more detailed discussion of the Baby M case see, Annas, G. J., The Case of Baby M: Babies (and Justice) for Sale, Hastings Center Report, June, 1987.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1989 Rutgers, The State University
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Annas, G.J. (1989). Regulating the New Reproductive Technologies. In: Cohen, S., Taub, N. (eds) Reproductive Laws for the 1990s. Contemporary Issues in Biomedicine, Ethics, and Society. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3710-5_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3710-5_20
Publisher Name: Humana Press
Print ISBN: 978-0-89603-175-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-3710-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive