Abstract
The recent national impassioned debate generated by the Baby M case has dramatically increased the necessity of recognizing disparate voices in any feminist discussion of “third-party reproduction.” Indeed, the very language of “third-party reproduction” underscores tensions over the meanings of pregnancy and parenting when reduced to the realm of contract law. For many of us who participated in the Rutgers University Law School’s Project on Reproductive Laws for the 1990s, these tensions have been discussed fruitfully, but are not ultimately represented in the other position papers prepared for this book.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1989 Rutgers, The State University
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chavkin, W., Rothman, B.K., Rapp, R. (1989). Alternative Modes of Reproduction: Other Views and Questions. In: Cohen, S., Taub, N. (eds) Reproductive Laws for the 1990s. Contemporary Issues in Biomedicine, Ethics, and Society. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3710-5_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3710-5_19
Publisher Name: Humana Press
Print ISBN: 978-0-89603-175-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-3710-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive