Skip to main content

Protective Legislation and Occupational Hazards: Flawed Science and Poor Policies

  • Commentary
  • Chapter
Reproductive Laws for the 1990s

Part of the book series: Contemporary Issues in Biomedicine, Ethics, and Society ((CIBES))

  • 134 Accesses

Abstract

The need for each living species to reproduce is incontrovertible. In some species, reproduction seems to be the very raison d’etre. However, humans in most societies have other purposes for living and, hence, more exercise of choice in the decision to reproduce. In fact, not all humans, either male or female, do reproduce, and, in modern industrial countries, reproduction is limited and carefully timed by the majority of people.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. Court of Justice ruling on pregnancy and protection as cited in note 2.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Commission of the European Community, “Protective Legislation for Women in the European Community,” Brussels, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Table 1 is taken from Women’s Occupational Health Resource Center News 8(3), Spring 1987, p. 8 and is based on information contained in the source in note 2.

    Google Scholar 

  4. See Mary Sue Henifin, Barbara Fried, and Ruth Hubbard, “Biological Woman: The Convenient Myth” (1982) for extensive documentation of the misinterpretation and misuse of science with regard to women.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Curran, William J., “Law-Medicine Notes: Dangers for Pregnant Women in the Work Place,” New England Journal of Medicine 312, January 17, 1985, pp. 164–165.

    Google Scholar 

  6. This analysis appeared as a signed editorial in Women’s Occupational Health Resource Center News 8(3), Spring 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  7. See Stellman, Jeanne, “Protective Legislation, Ionizing Radiation and Health: A New Appraisal and International Survey,” Women and Health 12(1), 1987 for a discussion of these changes and the rationale behind them.

    Google Scholar 

  8. See note 5.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Rutgers, The State University

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stellman, J.M. (1989). Protective Legislation and Occupational Hazards: Flawed Science and Poor Policies. In: Cohen, S., Taub, N. (eds) Reproductive Laws for the 1990s. Contemporary Issues in Biomedicine, Ethics, and Society. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3710-5_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3710-5_16

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-89603-175-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-3710-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics