Advertisement

General Representation Theory of Jordan Algebras

Chapter
  • 488 Downloads
Part of the Contemporary Mathematicians book series (CM)

Abstract

The theory of Jordan algebras has originated in the study of subspaces of an associative algebra that are closed relative to the composition ab=a×b+b×a where the × denotes the associative product. Such systems are called special Jordan algebras. It is well known that the composition ab satisfies the conditions
$$ ab = ba,\;\left( {{a^2}b} \right)a = {a^2}\left( {ba} \right) $$
(0.1)
This has led to the definition of an (abstract) Jordan algebra as a (nonassociative) algebra whose multiplication satisfies the above conditions. It is an open question as to how extensive is the subclass of special Jordan algebras in the class of Jordan algebras. However, it is known that there exist Jordan algebras which are not special.

Keywords

Associative Algebra Jordan Algebra Special Representation Universal Algebra Nilpotent Derivation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. 1.
    A. A. Albert, A structure theory for Jordan algebras, Ann. of Math. vol. 48 (1947) pp. 446–467.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    G. Birkhoff, Analytical groups, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. vol. 43 (1938) pp. 61–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    G. Birkhoff and P. Whitman, Representations of Jordan and Lie algebras, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. vol. 61 (1949) pp. 116–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    S. Eilenberg, Extensions of general algebras, Annales de la Société Polonaise de Mathématique vol. 21 (1948) pp. 125–134.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Harish-Chandra, On the radical of a Lie algebra, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society vol. 1 (1950) pp. 14–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    G. Hochschild, Semi-simple algebras and generalized derivations, Amer. J. Math. vol. 64 (1941) pp. 677–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    F. D. Jacobson and N. Jacobson, Classification and representation of semi-simple Jordan algebras, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. vol. 65 (1949) pp. 141–169.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    N. Jacobson, Rational methods in the theory of Lie algebras, Ann. of Math. vol. 36 (1935) pp. 875–881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    N. Jacobson, Structure theory of simple rings without finiteness assumptions, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. vol. 57 (1945) pp. 228–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    N. Jacobson, Lie and Jordan triple systems, Amer. J. Math. vol. 71 (1949) pp. 149–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    N. Jacobson, Derivation algebras and multiplication algebras of semi-simple Jordan algebras, Ann. of Math. vol. 50 (1949) pp. 866–874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. Malcev, On the representation of an algebra as a direct sum of the radical and a semi-simple algebra, C. R. (Doklady) Acad. Sci. URSS vol. 36 (1942) pp. 42–45.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    A. J. Penico, The Wedderburn principal theorem for Jordan algebras, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. vol. 70 (1951) pp. 404–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    R. D. Schafer, A theorem on the derivations of Jordan algebras, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society vol. 2 (1951) pp. 290–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    E. V. Schenkman, A theory of subinvariant Lie algebras, to appear in Amer. J. Math.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    J. H. C. Whitehead, Certain equations in the algebra of a semi-simple infinitesimal group, Quart. J. Math. Oxford Ser. vol. 8 (1937) pp. 220–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    E. Witt, Treue Darstellung Liescher Ringe, Journal fur Mathematik vol. 177 (1937) pp. 152–160.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Birkhäuser Boston 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Yale UniversityNew HavenUSA

Personalised recommendations