Skip to main content

Analysis of symmetric cross-classifications

  • Conference paper
Statistical Modelling

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Statistics ((LNS,volume 57))

  • 410 Accesses

Abstract

Analysis of data involving symmetrically classified responses involves log-linear models with nonstandard parmetrization. These can be specified in an extended version of symbolic notation that is available in GLIM, so that suitable definition of qualitative and quantitative terms and the recognition of nesting relations among the terms lead to a unified treatment of a large number of previously proposed methods. This approach may be extended to (i) comparison of symmetric tables in different populations and (ii) modelling the effects of symmetrically cross-classified factors on response with a distribution from exponential family. Illustrative applications involve comparison of eye vision among men and women and dependence of fertility on father’s and respondent’s social class.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agresti, A. (1983). A simple diagonals-parameter symmetry and quasi-symmetry model.Statistics and Probability Letters 1, 313–16.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Baker, R. J. (1979). Interpreting log-linear models.GLIM Newsletter No. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Berendt, J. (1952). Fertility and social mobility.Popul. Stud. 5, 244–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bock, R. D. (1970). Estimating multinomial response relations. Pp. 111–132 in: Bose, R. C., Rao, C. R., Smith, K. J. C., eds.;Essays in Probability and Statistics. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Breen, R. (1985). Log-multiplicative models for contingency tables using GLIM.GLIM Newsletter 10.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dessen, J., Jansen, W., Luijkx, R. (1985). Fitting log-multiplicative association models.GLIM Newslatter 11.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Duncan, O.D. (1966). Methodological issues in the analysis of social mobility. Pp. 51–97 in: Smelser, N.J., Lipset, S.M., eds.;Social Structure and Mobility in Economic Development. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Freeman, D. H. Jr. (1987).Applied Categorical Data Analysis. New York: Dekkei.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Goodman, L. A. (1972). Some multiplicative models for the analysis of cross-classified data. Pp. 649–696 in: Le Cam, L., Neyman, J., Scott, E.L., eds.;Proceed. 6th Berkeley Symp. on Mathem. Stat, and Prob. Berkeley: Univ. of Calif. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Goodman, L. A. (1978).Analyzing Qualitative/Categorical Data. London: Addison-Wesley.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Goodman, L. A. (1979a). Multiplicative models for square contingency tables with ordered categories.Biometrika 66, 413–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Goodman, L. A. (1979b). Simple models for the analysis of association in cross-classifications having ordered categories.J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 74537–552.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Goodman, L. A. (1981). Three elementary views of log-linear models for the analysis of cross-classifications having ordered categories. Pp. 193–249 in: S. Leinhardt, ed.;Sociological Methodology 1981. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Goodman, L. A. (1985). The analysis of cross-classified data having ordered and/or unordered categories: association models, correlation models, and assymetry models for contingency tables with or without missing entries.Ann. Statist. 13, 10–69.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Goodman, L. A., Fay, R. (1974). ECTA: Everyman’s Contingency Table Analyzer. Program Documenttion. Department of Statistics, University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Green, M. (1988). A modelling approach to multiple correspondence analysis. Pp. 317–322 in: Edwards, D., Raun, N.E., eds.;COMPSTAT 1988. Proceedings in Computational Statistics. Heidelberg: Physica Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Grizzle, J. E., Starmer, C. F., Koch, G. G. (1969). Analysis of categorical data by linear model.Biometrics 25, 489–504.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Hauser, R. M. (1978). A structural model of the mobility table.Social Forces 56, 919–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Haberman, S.J. (1974).The Analysis of Frequency Data. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Haberman, S. J. (1979).Analysis of Qualitative Data. Vol. 1 and 2. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hope, K. (1981). Vertical mobility in Britain: a structured analysis.Sociology 15, 19–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kutylowski, A. J. (1988a). Analysis of square contingency tables with applications. Paper presented at theAnnual Meeting of the Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics, Aalborg University Center, November 8–10, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kutylowski, A. J. (1988b). Structural analysis of social mobility tables. Paper presented at the workshopLabor Mobility in Nordic Countries, Trade Unions Institute for Economic Research, Stockholm, December 1–2, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kutylowski, A. J. (1989). Analysis of multivariate categorical response data with logit models. Paper presented at theSymposiuminApplied Statistics, organized by UNI*C at Aarhus University, Aarhus, January 23–25, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  25. McCullagh, P., Nelder, J. A. (1983).Generalized Linear Models. London: Chapman and Hall.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Payne, C., ed. (1985).The GLIM System Release 3.77 Manual. Oxford: Numerical Algorithms Group.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Plackett, R. L. (1974).The Analysis of Categorical Data. London: Griffin.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Wilkinson, G. N., Rogers, C. E. (1973). Symbolic description of factorial models for analysis of variance.Applied Statistics22,392–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kutylowski, A.J. (1989). Analysis of symmetric cross-classifications. In: Decarli, A., Francis, B.J., Gilchrist, R., Seeber, G.U.H. (eds) Statistical Modelling. Lecture Notes in Statistics, vol 57. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3680-1_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3680-1_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-97097-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-3680-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics