Advertisement

Representations, Resolutions and Intertwining Numbers

  • Kaan Akin
  • David A. Buchsbaum
Part of the Mathematical Sciences Research Institute Publications book series (MSRI, volume 15)

Abstract

It may, at first glance, seem inappropriate to be talking about representations of the general linear group at a conference on commutative algebra. We would like, therefore, to offer some observations: one, historical; one, personal; and one, perhaps presumptuous, that might reconcile this apparent anomaly.

Keywords

Exact Sequence Commutative Algebra Characteristic Zero General Linear Group Divided Power 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    K. Akin, On complexes relating the Jacobi-Trudi identity with the Bernstein- Gelfand-Gelfand resolution, J. Algebra (to appear).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    K. Akin and D. A. Buchsbaum, Characteristic-free representation theory of the general linear group, Adv. in Math. 58 (1985).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    K. Akin and D. A. Buchsbaum, Characteristic-free representation theory of the general linear group II: Homological considerations, Adv. in Math, (to appear).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    K. Akin and D. A. Buchsbaum, Characteristic-free realizations of the Giambelli and Jacobi-Trudi determinantal identities, in “Proc. of K. I. T. Workshop on Algebra and Topology,”1987.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    K. Akin, D. A. Buchsbaum and J. Weyman, Schur functors and Schur complexes, Adv. in Math. 44 (1982).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    K. Akin, D. A. Buchsbaum and J. Weyman, Resolutions of determinantal ideals: the submaximal minors, Adv. in Math. 39 (1981).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    D. A. Buchsbaum, Jacobi-Trudi and Giambelli identities in characteristic-free form in “Proc. Special Session on Invariant Theory,” AMS Meeting, Denton, Texas, 1986 (to appear).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    D. A. Buchsabum and D. S. Rim, A generalized Koszul complex II: Depth and multiplicity, Trans. AMS 111 (1964).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    R. W. Carter and G. Lusztig, On the modular representations of the general linear and symmetric groups, Math. Zeit. 136 (1974).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    R. W. Carter and J. T. Payne, On homomorphisms between Weyl modules and Specht modules, Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 87 (1980).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. Eagon and D. G. Northcott, Ideals defined by matrices and a certain complex associated to them, Proc. Royal Soc. A269 (1962).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    J. A. Green, Polynomial representations of GLn, Lecture Notes in Math., vol. 830, Springer-Verlag (1980).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    D. Hilbert, Über die Theorie der algebraischen Formen, Math. Ann. 36 (1890).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    A. Lascoux, Thèse, Paris (1977).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    H. A. Nielsen, Tensor functors of complexes, Aarhus University Preprint Series, no. 15 (1978).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    P. Pragacz and J. Weyman, Complexes associated with trace and evaluation. Another approach to Lascoux’s resolution, Adv. in Math. 57 (1985).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kaan Akin
    • 1
    • 2
  • David A. Buchsbaum
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of MathematicsUniversity of OklahomaNormanUSA
  2. 2.Department of MathematicsBrandeis UniversityWalthamUSA

Personalised recommendations