Abstract
Innovative designs, having some relation to previous design prototypes, are derived by manipulating the design space to generate new design features or prototypes. Our research effort [1,2] is aimed at developing a computer-based innovative design methodology known as 1stPRINCE (FIRST PRINciple Computational Evaluator) which incorporates the qualitative, functional, and numerical levels of reasoning outlined by Agogino [3]. These methods utilize monotonicity analysis, which observes the sign of the algebraic first derivative of design variables, to make qualitative decisions that direct globally optimal behavior and detect flaws in the problem formalization. Mathematical functional information is used by computer algebra routines as deemed important from the monotonicity analysis. Monotonicity analysis and functional backsubstitution are implemented in the SYMON-SYMFUNE programs [4,5]. If constraints cannot be met or a designer wishes to investigate alternative designs, 1stPRINCE goes one step further in modifying the design space by breaking integrals into smaller ranges to create novel design prototypes. Algebraic solutions to the design problem are reduced by computer algebra routines which can be solved numerically to obtain specific solutions and quantitative comparisons between solutions. 1stPRINCE has been applied to a beam under torsion load and a beam under flexure load. In each case the system was told to minimize the weight of the beam subject to various physical constraints (maximum stress, deflection, weight, etc.) By starting with a solid round beam as the only structural prototype for the torsion load, 1stPRINCE derives a hollow and composite rod. For the flexural beam, a series of stepped beams are created, approaching a tapered beam. Some designs proposed by 1stPRINCE may be unusual, but all geometric modifications that lead to new design prototypes satisfy all assumed constraints and are optimally-directed within those constraints. Because 1stPRINCE treats material properties as design variables, combinations of various materials lead to optimally-directed composite beam configurations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cagan, J. and A.M Agogino (1988a), “Innovative Design of Mechanical Structures from First Principles,” in press: AI EDAM: AI in Engineering, Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, V. 1 (3).
Cagan, J. and A.M. Agogino (1988b), “Reasoning about Mechanical Structures from First Principles, Proc. of the 12 th IMACS World Congress on Scientific Computation, V. 4, pp. 278–282.
Agogino, A.M., “AI in Computer-Aided Design: Qualitative Reasoning and Symbolic Computation,” The Study of the Design Process, (ed., M. Waldron: Ohio State University), pp. 263–294.
Choy, J.K. and A.M. Agogino (1986), “SYMON: Automated SYMbolic MONotonicity Analysis System for Qualitative Design Optimization”, Proc., ASME 1986 International Computers in Engineering Conference, ASME, V. 2, pp. 305–310.
Agogino, A.M., Almgren, A.S. (1987), “Techniques for Integrating Qualitative Reasoning and Symbolic Computation in Engineering Optimization”, Engineering Optimization V. 12 (2), Sept./Oct. 1987, pp. 117–135.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1989 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Agogino, A.M., Cagan, J. (1989). Optimally-Directed Innovative Design. In: Newsome, S.L., Spillers, W.R., Finger, S. (eds) Design Theory ’88. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3646-7_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3646-7_12
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-8189-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-3646-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive