Aesthetic Influences on Expert Mathematical Problem Solving

  • Edward A. Silver
  • Wendy Metzger

Abstract

In the past two decades, considerable progress has been made in understanding the mechanisms underlying successful human problem solving. One valuable line of inquiry has focused on the differences between experts and novices in a variety of task domains, including mathematics and science (e.g., Frederiksen, 1984; Silver & Marshall, in press). This research has highlighted a number of features that distinguish expert from novice behavior. It has been established, for example, that experts have extensive and powerfully organized stores of domain-specific knowledge that they can access in solving problems in their discipline. Moreover, experts have flexible representation systems available, and they often engage in qualitative analyses of problems before beginning quantitative actions.

Keywords

Coherence Expense Hate 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Davis, P., & Hersh, R. (1981). The mathematical experience. Boston: Birkhàuser.Google Scholar
  2. Dreyfus, T., & Eisenberg, T. (1986). On the aesthetics of mathematical thought. For the Learning of Mathematics, 6, 2–10.Google Scholar
  3. Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1984). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  4. Frederiksen, N. (1984). Implications of cognitive theory for instruction in problem solving. Review of Educational Research, 54, 363–408.Google Scholar
  5. Hadamard, J. (1945). The psychology of invention in the mathematical field. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Kline, M. (1962). Mathematics: A cultural approach. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  7. Krutetskii, V.A. (1976). The psychology of mathematical abilities in schoolchildren (J. Teller, Trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  8. Mandler, G. (1982). The structure of value: Accounting for taste. In M.S. Clarke & S.T. Fiske (Eds.), Affect and cognition (pp. 3–36). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  9. Mandler, G. (1985). Cognitive psychology: An essay in cognitive science. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  10. Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  11. Poincaré, H. (1946). The foundations of science (G.B. Halsted, Trans.). Lancaster, PA: Science Press. (Original work published 1913.)Google Scholar
  12. Schoenfeld, A.H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  13. Silver, E.A., & Marshall, S.P (in press). Mathematical and scientific problem solving: Findings, issues and instructional implications. In B.F. Jones & L. Idol (Eds.), Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction (Vol. 1). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  14. von Glasersfeld, E. (1985, July). How could children not hate numbers? Paper presented at the conference on the Theory of Mathematics Education, Bielefeld, Germany.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edward A. Silver
  • Wendy Metzger

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations