Advertisement

A Hypothesis Concerning the Effects of Macro-Porosity on Mechanical Properties of Concrete

  • Sandor Popovics
Conference paper

Abstract

A hypothetical mechanism is offered for the observation that the porosity has a greater effect on the compressive strength of a concrete than on its flexural strength which effect is again greater than that on pulse velocity. The explanation is based on Griffith’s theory of fracture of brittle materials which states that even uniaxial loadings, such as uniaxial compression, produce not only a uniaxial stress field but also tensile stress concentrations around the pore tips in the brittle material. These, in turn, crack the material progressively until it fails. The greater the magnitude of the uniform stress field, the greater the stress concentrations, thus the greater the damage caused by the pores. This is why, say, 1% increase in porosity causes greater reduction in the compressive strength of a concrete than in its flexural strength or in other mechanical properties. A quantitative form of this mechanism is also presented.

Keywords

Compressive Strength Flexural Strength Uniaxial Compressive Strength Brittle Material Concrete Strength 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Abrams, D. A., “Design of Concrete Mixtures,” Bulletin 1, Structural Materials Research Laboratory, Lewis Institute, Chicago, December, 1918, p. 22.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kaplan, M. F., “Effects of Incomplete Consolidation on Compressive and Flexural Strength, Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity and Dynamic Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete,” ACI Journal, Proc. Vol. 56, March 1960, pp. 853-867.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Popovics, S., Concrete Making Materials, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, etc. and Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, Washington, etc. 1979, p. 370.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Popovics, S., “New Formulas for the Prediction of the Effect of Porosity on Concrete Strength.” ACI Journal. Proceedings V. 82, No. 2, Mar.–Apr. 1985, pp. 136–146.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Popovics, S., “The Fracture Mechanism in Concrete: How Much Do We Know?” Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, Proc. ASCE, EM 3, June 1969, pp. 531–544.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Millard, D. J., Discussion of the paper “Porosity and Strength of Brittle Solids,” by K. K, Schiller in Walton, W. H. Mechanical Properties of-Non-Mettalic Brittle Materials, Mechanical Properties of Non-metallic Brittle Materials. W. H. Walton, Editor, Interscience Publishers, Inc., New York, 1958. pp. 45–47.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ryskewitsch, E., “Compressive Strength of Porous Sintered Alumina and Zirconia — 9th Communication to Ceramography,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, Vol. 36, No. 2, February, 1953. pp. 65–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Popovics, S., “Effect of Porosity on the Strength of Concrete,” Journal of Materials, JMLSA, Vol. 4, No. 2, June, 1969. pp. 356–371.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Popovics, S., “Structural Model Approach to Two-Phase Composite Materials: State of the Art,” American Ceramic Society Bulletin, Vol. 48, No. 11, November, 1969. pp. 1060–1064.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sandor Popovics
    • 1
  1. 1.Drexel UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations