A Component Theory for Attitude Objects

  • Paul Dohmen
  • Jörg Doll
  • Hubert Feger
Part of the Springer Series in Social Psychology book series (SSSOC)

Abstract

The component theory for attitude objects (Feger, 1979) attempts to provide a framework for the integration of major fields of attitude research: attitude formation and acquisition, measurement of the evaluative orientation toward objects, deriving the cognitive structure of a set of attitude objects, predicting attitude change, and contributing to research on the relationships between attitude and behavior. First, the basic concepts and some fundamental assumptions of the theory are introduced, then several studies for testing the theory are reported. The final sections are concerned with the prediction of behavior and formal models.

Keywords

Assimilation Beach Posite 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 888–918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Asch, S.E. (1946). Forming impressions of personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41, 258–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Conover, W.J. (1971). Practical nonparametric statistics.New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  4. Coombs, C.H. (1964). A theory of data.New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  5. Cronbach, L.J., & Gleser, G.C. (1953). Assessing similarity between profiles. Psychological Bulletin, 6, 456–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cronbach, L.J., Gleser, G.C., Nanda, H., & Rajaratnam, N. (1972). The dependability of behavioral measurements: Theory of generalizability for scores and profiles.New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  7. Dawes, R.M., & Corrigan, B. (1974). Linear models in decision making. Psychological Bulletin, 81, 95–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dohmen, P. (1983). Einstellungsstruktur, Präferenz und Einstellungsänderung: eine experimentelle Prüfung des Komponentenmodells sozialer Einstellungen.Unpublished dissertation, Aachen.Google Scholar
  9. Dohmen, P. (1985). Zur Bedeutung bilinearer Einstellungsmodelle. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 16, (240–252).Google Scholar
  10. Dohmen, P., & Doll, J. (1984). Einstellungsstrukturen zu Personen und Politikern: Eine experimentelle Studie. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle und Angewandte Psychologie, 31, 419–438.Google Scholar
  11. Dohmen, P., & Feger, H. (1984). Untersuchungen zum Komponentenmodell der Einstellungsobjekte: II. Experimentelle Prüfungen. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 15, 136–150.Google Scholar
  12. Droge, U., & Feger, H. (1983). Ordinal network scaling.Paper presented at the joint meeting of the Classification Society and the Psychometric Society, Paris.Google Scholar
  13. Droge, U., & Feger, H. (1985). Erweiterung und Anwendung der Ordinalen Netzwerkskalierung.(Abschlußbericht zum Projekt) Universität Hamburg, Fachbereich Psychologie, Arbeitsbereich Sozialpsychologie, Hamburg.Google Scholar
  14. Feger, H. (1974). Die Erfassung individueller Einstellungsstrukturen. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 5, 242–254.Google Scholar
  15. Feger, H. (1979). Einstellungsstruktur und Einstellungsänderung: Ergebnisse, Probleme und ein Komponentenmodell der Einstellungsobjekte. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 10, 331–349.Google Scholar
  16. Feger, H. (1982). Multidimensional scaling of attitudes: intra- and interindividual variations in preferences and cognitions. In B. Wegener (Ed.); Social attitudes and psychophysical measurement(pp. 219–235). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  17. Feger, H. (1985a). Ordinal testing of component models for attitude objects.Paper presented at the Fourth European Meeting of the Psychometric Society and the Classification Societies, Cambridge, U.K.Google Scholar
  18. Feger, H. (1985b). Attitude theory and attitude measurementPaper presented at the symposion: “Perspectives on Contemporary German Social Psychology” at Brighton,` University of Sussex, U.K.Google Scholar
  19. Feger, H., & Bien, W. (1982). Network unfolding. Social Networks, 4, 257–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Feger, H., & Dohmen, P. (1984). Untersuchungen zum Komponentenmodell der Einstellungsobjekte: I. Theorie und nichtexperimentelle Studien. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie 15, 33–43.Google Scholar
  21. Fishbein, M (1963). An investigation of the relationships between beliefs about an object and the attitude toward that object Human Relations, 16, 233–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fishburn, P. (1970). Utility theory for decision making. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  23. Guttman, L. (1984). Coefficients of monotonicity and polytonicity.Unpublished manuscript, Israel Institute of Applied Social Research, Jerusalem.Google Scholar
  24. Klauer, C.K. (working paper). Die Axiomatisierung des Modells positiver Komponenten mit dichotomen Zuschreibungen sowie des Aspektdistanzmodells für Ähnlichkeiten und ein axiomatisches ONS-Teilmodell.University of Hamburg, Department of Psychology.Google Scholar
  25. Krech, D., & Crutchfleld, RS. (1948). Theory and problems in social psychology.New York: McGraw-Hill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lingoes, J.C. (1973). The Guttman-Lingoes Nonmetric Program Series.Ann Arbor, MI: Mathesis Press.Google Scholar
  27. Maimon, Z. (1978). The choice of ordinal measures of association. Quality and Quantity, 12, 255–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Orth, B. (1985). Bedeutsamkeitsanalysen bilinearer Einstellungsmodelle. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 16, 101–115.Google Scholar
  29. Orth, B. (working paper). Ein Komponentenmodell mit dichotomen Zuschreibungen. Teil I: Ein axiomatisches Teilmodell der Präferenzen.University of Hamburg, Department of Psychology.Google Scholar
  30. Restle, F. (1959). A metric and an ordering on sets. Psychometrika, 24, 207–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sjöberg, L. (1982). Beliefs and values as attitude components. In B. Wegener (Ed.);Social attitudes and psychophysical measurement(pp. 199–217). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  32. Slovic, P. (1969). Analyzing the expert judge: A descriptive study of a stockbroker’s decision process. Journal of Applied Psychology, 53, 255–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Staufenbiel, T. (in press). Critical values and properties of µ2.Google Scholar
  34. Tversky, A. (1977). Features of similarity. Psychological Review, 84, 327–352. Reprint (1980). In E.D. Lantermann & H. Feger (Eds.);Similarity and choice(pp. 12–53). Bern: Huber.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Upmeyer, A. (1980). Protokoll des ersten Rundgespräches des Schwerpunktes “Einstellung und Verhalten.” Unpublished manuscript, Berlin.Google Scholar
  36. Upshaw, H.S. (1980). Die Anwendung der konfirmatorischen Faktoranalyse in der Einstellungsforschung. In F. Petermann (Hrsg.); Einstellungsmessung Einstellungsforschung(pp. 175–194). Göttingen, FRG: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  37. Wilcox, J.W. (1972). A method for measuring decision assumptions.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  38. Winer, B.J. (1971). Statistical principles in experimental design (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Dohmen
  • Jörg Doll
  • Hubert Feger

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations