Skip to main content

Commentary

Foundations of Intervention Research

  • Chapter
Intervention Research in Learning Disabilities

Abstract

The preceding chapters by Kavale and Swanson set the stage for this whole volume, one devoted entirely to research on interventions in learning disabilities. As noted by Kavale, intervention is the reason for the existence of the field of learning disabilities. While other disciplines, such as psychology and paleontology, can establish and develop themselves by virtue of their ability to explain existing phenomena relevant to those disciplines, learning disabilities is a viable and worthwhile field of inquiry only to the extent that it is able to actuate positive change in the lives of those so characterized. Without reliably effective interventions, all our abilities to document and explain the learning disabilities phenomenon are of little value.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ceci, S. (Ed.) (1986). Handbook of cognitive, social, and neuropsychological aspects of learning disabilities(Vol. 1). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooney, J.B., & Swanson, H.L. (1987). Memory and learning disabilities: An overview. In H.L. Swanson (Ed.), Memory and learning disabilities: Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities(pp. 1 – 40 ). Greenwich, CT: JAI.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1890). Principles of Psychology. New York: Holt.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kavale, K.A. (1989). Addressing individual differences in the classroom: Are we up to the job? Teacher Education and Special Education, 12, 179 – 182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kavale, K.A., & Forness, S.R. (1990). Substance over style: A rejoinder to Dunn’s animadversions. Exceptional Children, 56, 357 - 361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kavale, K.A., & Forness, S.R. (1985). The science of learning disabilities. Boston: College Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keogh, B.K. (1987). A shared attribute model of learning disabilities. In S. Vaughn & C. Bos (Eds.), Research in learning disabilities: Issues and future directions(pp. 3 – 12 ). Boston: College-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keogh, B.K., Major, S.M., Omori, H., Gandara, P., & Reid, H.P. (1980). Proposed markers in learning disabilities research. Journal of Abnormal Child Psycholooy, 8, 21 – 31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mastropieri, M.A. (1989). Using general education teacher effectiveness literature in the preparation of special education personnel. Teacher Education and Special Education, 72, 170 – 172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsonson, B.S., & Baer, D.M. (1978). The analysis and presentation of graphic data. In T.R. Kratochwill (Ed.), Single subject research: Strategies for evaluating change. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressley, M., Scruggs, T.E., & Mastropieri, M.A. (1989). Memory strategy research in learning disabilities: Present and future directions. Learning Disabilities Research, 4, 68 – 77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scruggs, T.E., & Mastropieri, M.A. (1988a). Acquisition and transfer of learning strategies by gifted and non-gifted students. Journal of Special Education, 22, 153 – 166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scruggs, T.E. & Mastropieri, M.A. (1988b). Legimitizing the field of learning disabilities: Does research orientation matter? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 219 – 222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scruggs, T.E., & Mastropieri, M.A. (1990). The case for mnemonic instruction: From laboratory investigations to classroom applications. Journal of Special Education, 23, 7 – 29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scruggs, T.E., Mastropieri, M.A., & Levin, J.R. (1987). Implications of mnemonic strategy research for theories of learning disabilities. In H.L. Swanson (Ed.), Memory and learning disabilities: Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities(pp. 225 – 244 ). Greenwich, CT: JAI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, H.L. (1987). Verbal coding deficit in learning disabled readers: Remembering pictures and words. In H.L. Swanson (Ed.), Memory and learning disabilities: Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities(pp. 263 – 304 ). Greenwich, CT: JAI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, H.L. (1988a). Comments, countercomments, and new thoughts. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 289 – 298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, H.L. (1988b). Toward a metatheory of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 196 – 209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tallmadge, G.K. (1977). The joint dissemination review panel idea book. Washington, DC: National Institute of Education and U.S. Office of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughn, S., & Bos, C. (Eds.). (1987). Research in learning disabilities: Issues and future directions. Boston: College Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, B.Y.L. (1987). Conceptual and methodological issues in interventions with learning disabled children and adolescents. In S. Vaughn & C. Bos (Eds.), Research in learning disabilities: Issues and future directions(pp. 185 – 196 ). Boston: College Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ysseldyke, J., Algozzine, B., & Thurlow, M. (1983). On interpreting institute research: A response to McKinney. Exceptional Education Quarterly, 4(1), 145– 147.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1990 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Scruggs, T.E. (1990). Commentary. In: Scruggs, T.E., Wong, B.Y.L. (eds) Intervention Research in Learning Disabilities. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3414-2_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3414-2_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-97280-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-3414-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics