Effects of the Interaction



In Chapter 5, we tested competing hypotheses from legal development theory (Levine & Tapp, 1977; Tapp & Kohlberg, 1977) and social learning theory (Akers, 1985; Akers et al., 1979; Aronfreed, 1968, 1969; Bandura, 1969a, 1969b, 1976) in order to determine the relative influence of internal and external factors in legal socialization. We found that one’s level of legal reasoning was a better predictor of attitudes toward rules and rule-violating behaviors than was the rule-enforcing environment. In this chapter, we examine the possibility of an interaction between legal development and the socializing conditions. The theoretical basis for this possibility can be found in both legal development theory and social learning theory. We now test the hypothesis that an interaction between legal development level and rule-enforcing conditions explains a significant amount of the variance in legal socialization effects (normative status of rule-violating behaviors, enforcement status of the rules, and frequency of rule-violating behaviors).


Authority Condition Social Learning Theory Legal Reasoning Rule Violation Legal Development 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of New HampshireDurhamUSA
  2. 2.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of New HampshireDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations