Skip to main content

Abstract

Site selection is a critical decision making element for a wide range of economic activities, from land use planning to residential location selection by individuals. Typically, site selection involves two phases. First, a small number of alternatives among all possible sites are identified for further evaluation. Then these selected alternatives are examined in depth to find the optimal site. Because of the effort required for a thorough evaluation of each site, the number of sites included in the second stage is, by necessity, small. Therefore, the first phase of the site selection process is very important because if, for example, the “best” available site is not included in the set of alternatives selected for thorough study, then this site can never be selected as the optimal site. In large scale planning the first phase involves reconnaissance and prefeasibility studies. At the individual level, it may involve consultation with a specialist.

The Original version of this chapter was published in Expert Systems in Civil Engineering, Proceedings of a Symposium of the American Society of Civil Engineers, M.L. and C.N. Kostem (eds), April 8–9, 1986, pp. 182–192

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Addelman, S., 1962a. “Orthogonal Main-Effect Plans for Asymmetrical Factorial Experiments”, Technometrics, Vol. 4, pp. 21–26.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Addelman, S., 1962b. “Symmetrical and Asmmetrical Fractional Factorial Plans”, Technometrics, Vol. 4, pp. 47–59.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Fiegenbaum, E.A., 1983. “Knowledge Engineering: The Applied Side”, in Intelligent Systems, J.E. Hayes and D. Michie, eds., Ellis Horwood Limited, Chichester, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Findikaki, I.T., 1980. “Residential Location Preferences: A Conjoint Analysis Approach”, Engineer Thesis, Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Findikaki, I.T., 1982. “Conjoint Analysis of Residential Preferences”, PhD. Dissertation, Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, M., 1967. “A Behavior Theory Approach to the Relations between Beliefs about an Object and the Attitude towards the Object”, in Readings in Attitude and Theory Measurement, M. Fishbein ed., John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Richard M., 1974. “Trade Off Analysis of Consumer Values” in Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. XI, May, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K., 1951. Field Theory in Social Sciences, Harper and Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michie, D., S. Muggleton, C. Riese, S. Zurbrick, 1984. “Rulemaster: A Second Generation Knowledge-Engineering Facility”, First Conference of Artificial Intelligence Applications, Denver, December 5–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinlan, J.R., 1979. “Discovering Rule by Induction from Large Collection of Examples” in Expert Systems in the Micro Electronic Age, D. Mitchie ed., Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, M.J., 1956. “Cognitive Structure and Attidunal Affect”, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, Vol. 4, pp. 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., 1976. “A General Theory of Polynomial Conjoint Measurements”, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, Vol. 4, pp 175–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolpert, J., 1965. “Behavioral Aspects of the Decision to Migrate”, in Papers of the Regional Science Association, Vol. 15, pp. 159–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1990 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Findikaki, I. (1990). SISES: An Expert System for Site Selection. In: Kim, T.J., Wiggins, L.L., Wright, J.R. (eds) Expert Systems: Applications to Urban Planning. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3348-0_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3348-0_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-7976-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-3348-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics