Abstract
Ideas, as Socrates noted centuries ago, often are judged by their source. Hence, a common fallacy--one that is more widespread than is recognized by most--is to reject, or accept, a proposal because of the person advancing it. While ideas are best evaluated on criteria independent of their source, it is clear that the “right source” can advance proposals that might otherwise receive little attention. Of course, seldom are we prophets in our homeland, so it was not surprising to me that two thirds (65%) of the 50 directors selected randomly indicated that they had used the strategy of the outside expert. Among the 12 communities in which field studies were conducted, the proportion using this strategy was 100 percent.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1990 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Drabek, T.E. (1990). Outside Experts. In: Emergency Management. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3310-7_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3310-7_18
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-97114-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-3310-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive