Advertisement

Models of Neural Responsiveness to Electrical Stimulation

  • Charles C. Finley
  • Blake S. Wilson
  • Mark W. White

Abstract

In principle, electrical stimulation of the cochlea is a simple process. Intracochlear electrodes, when stimulated, create electrical field patterns within the cochlea. In the vicinity of the neural elements, these fields appear as extracellular voltage gradients or profiles that are continuous along the entire length of the neurons. These extracellular voltage fields produce current flow into and out of the neural elements depending on the local impedances of the neural membranes. If the neural elements are sufficiently depolarized, action potentials are generated that propagate along each cell’s axon to the cochlear nucleus. Globally these events occur simultaneously, but in varying degree, across a population of nerve cells, producing a group or ensemble of neural responses to the stimulation.

Keywords

Electrical Stimulation Electrode Array Basilar Membrane Electrode Configuration Node Position 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Békésy, G. von (1951). The course pattern of the electrical resistance in the cochlea of the guinea pig (electro-anatomy of the cochlea). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 23:18-28. Reprinted in Experiments in Hearing, by G. von Bekesy ( McGraw- Hill, New York ), 1960, pp. 684–703.Google Scholar
  2. Black, R.C., and Clark, G.M. (1980). Differential electrical excitation of the auditory nerve. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 67: 868–874.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cannon, M.W., Jr. (1976). Electrical impedances, current pathways and voltage sources in the guinea pig cochlea. Institute for Sensory Research Report ISR-S-14, Syracuse University, Syracuse, N.Y.Google Scholar
  4. Coburn, B. (1980). Electrical stimulation of the spinal cord: Two-dimensional finite element analysis with particular reference to epidural electrodes. Med. Biol. Eng. Comp. 18: 573–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Colombo, J., and Parkins, C.W. (1987). A model of electrical excitation of the mammalian auditory-nerve neuron. Hearing Res. 31: 287–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Finley, C.C., and Wilson, B.S. (1985). An integrated field-neuron model of electrical stimulation by intracochlear scala tympani electrodes. Abstracts of the 8th Midwinter Research Meeting of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, pp. 105–106.Google Scholar
  7. Finley, C.C., Wilson, B.S., and White, M.W. (1987). A finite-element model of bipolar field patterns in the electrically stimulated cochlea—A two-dimensional approximation. Proceedings of the Ninth Annual Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Boston, pp. 1901–1903.Google Scholar
  8. Frankenhaeuser, B., and Huxley, A.F. (1964). The action potential in the myelinated nerve fiber of Xenopus laevis as computed on the basis of voltage clamp data. J. Physiol. (London) 171: 302–315.Google Scholar
  9. Grizon, G. (1987). Investigation of current flow in the inner ear during electrical stimulation of intracochlear electrodes. MS thesis in EE CS, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  10. Hinojosa, R., and Marion, M. (1983). Histopathology of profound sensorineural deafness. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 405: 459–484.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Honrubia, V., Strelioff, D., and Sitko, S. (1974). Electroanatomy of the cochlea: Its role in cochlear potential measurements. Proceedings of the International Congress in Electrocochleography, Bronx, N.Y.Google Scholar
  12. Javel, E., Tong, Y.C., Shepherd, R.K., and Clark, G.M. (1987). Responses of cat auditory nerve fibers to biphasic electrical current pulses. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 96, Suppl. 128: 26–30.Google Scholar
  13. Johnstone, B.M., Johnstone, J.R., and Pugsley, I.D. (1966). Membrane resistance in endolymphatic walls of the first turn of the guinea-pig cochlea. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 40: 1398–1404.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Laurence, M. (1980). Factors in the continuing development of auditory prostheses. In Controversies in Otolaryngology, edited by J.B. Snow ( Saunders, Philadelphia ), pp. 433–442.Google Scholar
  15. Leake-Jones, P.A., and Rebscher, S.J. (1983). Cochlear pathology with chronically implanted scala tympani electrodes. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 405: 203–223.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Liberman, M.C., and Oliver, M.E. (1984). Morphometry of intracellularly labeled neurons of the auditory nerve: Correlations with functional properties. J. Comp. Neurol. 223: 163–176.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Loeb, G.E., Byers, C.L., Rebscher, S.J., Casey, D.E., Fong, M.M., Schindler, R.A., Gray, R.F., and Merzenich, M.M. (1983). Design and fabrication of an experimental cochlear prosthesis. Med. Biol. Eng. Compt. 21: 241–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McNeal, D.R. (1976). Analysis of a model for excitation of myelinated nerve. IEEE BME 23 (4): 329–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Merzenich, M.M., and White, M.W. (1977). Cochlear implant. The interface problem. Biomed. Eng. Instrum. Funct. Electr. Stimul. 3: 321–340.Google Scholar
  20. Miller, C.E., and Henriquez, C.S. (1988). Three-dimensional finite element solution for biopotentials: Erythrocyte in an applied field. IEEE ’ BME 35 (9): 712–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Misrahy, G.A., Hildreth, K.M., Shinabarger, E.W., and Gannon, W.J. (1958). Electrical properties of the wall of the endolymphatic space of the cochlea (guinea pig). Am. J. Physiol. 194: 396–402.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Patrick, J.F., Crosby, P.A., Hirshorn, M.S., Kuzma, J.A., Money, D.K., Ridler, J., and Seligman, P.M. (1985). Australian multi-channel implantable hearing prosthesis. In Cochlear Implants, edited by R.A. Schindler and M.M. Merzenich ( Raven Press, New York ), pp. 93–100.Google Scholar
  23. Pernkopf, E. (1960). Topographische Anatomie des Menschen IV. Band: Topographische and stratigraphische Anatomie des Kopfes. Zweite Halfte, Urban and Schwarzenberg, Berlin, p 599. (Note: 3rd English edition published in 1989 by Urban and Schwarzenberg, Baltimore-Munich).Google Scholar
  24. Ranck, J.B. (1975). Which elements are excited in electrical stimulation of mammalian central nervous system: A review. Brain Res. 98: 417–440.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rattay, F. (1986). Analysis of models for external stimulation of axons. IEEE BME 33 (10): 974–977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rattay, F. (1987). Ways to approximate current-distance relations for electrically stimulated fibers. J. Theor. Biol. 125: 339–349.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Reilly, J.P., Freeman, V.T., and Larkin, W.D. (1985). Sensory effects of transient electrical stimulation—Evaluation with a neuroelectric model. IEEE BME 32 (12): 1001–1011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Reilly, J.P., and Bauer, R.H. (1987). Application of a neuroelectric model to electrocutaneous sensory sensitivity: Parameter variation study. IEEE BME 34 (9): 752–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rubinstein, J.T., Soma, M., and Spelman, F.A. (1985). Mixed boundary value problem in the implanted cochlea: An analytical model of a cylindrical banded electrode array. IEEE 17 th Conf. EMBS, 1120–1123.Google Scholar
  30. Shepherd, R.K., Clary, G.M., Pyman, B.C., and Webb, R.L. (1985). The banded intracochlear electrode array: An evaluation of insertion trauma. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 94: 55–59.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Sitko, S. (1976). Electrical network properties of the guinea pig cochlea. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, San Diego, Calif.Google Scholar
  32. Soma, M., Spelman, F.A., and Rubinstein, J.T. (1984). Fields produced by the cochlear prosthesis: The ear as a multilayered medium. IEEE Frontiers of Engineering Computing in Health Care, pp. 401–405.Google Scholar
  33. Spelman, F.A., Clopton, B.M., and Pfingst, B.E. (1982). Tissue impedance and current flow in the implanted ear. Implications for the cochlear prosthesis. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. Suppl. 98, 91: 3–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Spelman, F.A., and Clopton, B.M. (1987). Measurement of the specific impedance of bony tissues in the guinea pig cochlea. Abstracts of the 10th Midwinter Research Meeting of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, #41.Google Scholar
  35. Strelioff, D. (1973). A computer simulation of the generation and distribution of cochlear potentials. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 54: 620–629.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Stypulkowski, P.H., and van den Honert, C. (1984). Physiological properties of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve. I. Compound action potential recordings. Hearing Res. 14: 205–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sweeney, J.D., Mortimer, J.J., and Durand, D. (1987). Modeling of mammalian myelinated nerve for functional neuromuscular stimulation. Proceedings of the Ninth Annual Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Boston, p. 1577.Google Scholar
  38. van den Honert, C., and Stypulkowski, P.H. (1987a). Single fiber mapping of spatial excitation patterns in the electrically stimulated auditory nerve. Hearing Res. 29: 195–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. van den Honert, C., and Stypulkowski, P.H. (1987b). Temporal response patterns of single auditory nerve fibers elicited by periodic electrical stimuli. Hearing Res. 29: 207–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Verveen, A.A., and Derksen, H.E. (1968). Fluctuation phenomena in nerve membrane. Proc. IEEE 56: 906–916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. White, M.W., Finley, C.C., and Wilson, B.S. (1987). Electrical stimulation model of the auditory nerve: Stochastic response characteristics. Proceedings of the Ninth Annual Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Boston, pp. 1906–1907.Google Scholar
  42. Wilson, B.S., and Finley, C.C. (1984). Speech processors for auditory prostheses. 2nd-4th Quarter Progress Reports. Contract NOl-NS-3-2356, NINCDS, NIH.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Verlag New York Inc. 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charles C. Finley
  • Blake S. Wilson
  • Mark W. White

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations