An Introduction to Contrast Sensitivity Testing

  • Jeremy M. Wolfe

Abstract

In the treatment of visual disorders and eye disease, it is obviously useful to assess the patient’s visual abilities. In principle, a great number of abilities could be tested (e.g., perception of motion, depth, color, faces, etc.). In practice, however, the first and often the only aspect of vision to be tested is spatial vision in or near the fovea. As used here, the term spatial vision refers to the ability to see achromatic, two-dimensional patterns. The most common clinical measures of spatial vision are visual acuity measures. In recent years there has been increasing awareness of the limitations of acuity measures and a corresponding rise in interest in other measures of visual function, in particular, contrast sensitivity.

Keywords

Anisotropy Retina Sine Glaucoma Cataract 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Pickering WH: Report on Mars, No. 11. Pop Astron 23:569–588, 1915.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Riggs LA: Visual acuity, in Graham CH, Bartlett NR, Hsia Y, et al., Vision and Visual Perception. New York/London/Sydney, John Wiley, 1965.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Keesey UT: Effects of involuntary eye movements on visual acuity. J Opt Soc Am 50:769–774, 1960.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Frisen L, Frisen M: How good is normal visual acuity? A study of letter acuity thresholds as a function of age. Gr Arch Clin Exper Ophthalmol 215:149–157, 1981.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Leibowitz H: The effect of pupil size on visual acuity for photometrically equated test fields at various levels of luminance. J Opt Soc Am 42:416–422, 1952.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Craik KJW: The effect of adaptation upon visual acuity. Br J Psychol 29:252–266, 1939.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Byram GM: The physical and photochemical basis of visual resolving power. I. The distribution of illu-mination in retinal images. J Opt Soc Am 34:571–591, 1944.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Thorn F, Scwartz F: Effects of dioptric blur on Snellen and grating acuity. Am J Optom Physiol Opt, in press.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cornsweet TN: Visual Perception. New York/ London, Academic Press, 1970.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ginsburg AP: Spatial filtering and visual form perception, in Boff K, Kaufman L, Thomas J. (eds), Handbook of Perception and Human Performance. New York, John Wiley, 1986.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Falmagne JC: Psychophysical measurement and theory, in Boff K, Kaufman L, Thomas J (eds), Handbook of Perception and Human Performance. New York, John Wiley, 1986.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Snodgrass JG, Levy-Berger G, Haydon M: Human Experimental Psychology. New York/Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Heinemann EG: The relation of apparent brightness to threshold for differences in luminance. J Exper Psychol 61:389–399, 1961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Levitt H: Transformed up-down methods in psy-choacoustics. J Acoust Soc Am 49:467–477, 1971.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tyrell RA, Owens DA: A rapid method to assess the resting state of the eyes and other threshold phe-nomenon: A modified BIN search (MOSS). Behav Res Meth Comp 20:137–141, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Van Nes FL, Bouman MA: Spatial modulation transfer in the human eye. J Opt Soc Am 57:401–406, 1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hoekstra J, Van der Goot DPA, Van den Brink G, et al: The influence of the number of cycles upon the visual contrast threshold for spatial sine wave patterns. Vis Res 14:365–368, 1974.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Savoy RL, McCann JJ: Visibility of low-spatial-frequency sine wave targets: Dependence on number of cycles. J Opt Soc Am 65:343–350, 1975.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Westheimer G: The spatial sense of the eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sei 18:893–912, 1979.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Appelle S: Perception and discrimination as a function of stimulus orientation: The “oblique effect” in man and animals. Psych Bull 78:266–278, 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zemon V, Gutowski W, Horton T: Orientational anisotropy in the human visual system: an evoked potential and psychophysical study. Int J Neurosci 19:259–286, 1983.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Timney BN, Muir DW: Orientation anisotropy: Incidence and magnitude in Caucasian and Chinese subjects. Science 193:699–701, 1976.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bauer JA, Fang L, Gwiazda J, et al: Meridional anisotropics in Chinese and Caucasian infants and adults. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sei (suppl) (ARVO) 26:136, 1985. Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mayer MJ: Practice improves adults’ sensitivity to diagonals. Vis Res 23:547–550, 1983.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Henning GB: Spatial-frequency tuning as a function of temporal frequency and stimulus motion. J Opt Soc Am-A 5:1362–1373, 1988.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Olzak LA, Thomas JP: Seeing spatial patterns, in Boff K, Kaufman L, Thomas J (eds), Handbook of Perception and Human Performance. New York, John Wiley, 1986.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Westheimer G: Pupil size and visual resolution. Vis Res 4:39–45, 1964.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mitchell DE, Wilkinson F: The effect of early astigmatism on the visual resolution of gratings. J Physiol 243:739–756, 1974.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Legge GE, Mullen KT, Woo GC, et al: Tolerance to visual defocus. J Opt Soc Am-A 4:851–863, 1987.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Apkarian P, Tijssen R, Spekreijse H, et al: Origin of notches in CSF: Optical or neural. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sei 28:607–612, 1987.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Campbell FW, Green DG: Optical and retinal factors affecting visual resolution. J Physiol 181:576–593, 1965.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Williams DR: Aliasing in human foveal vision. Vis fos 25:195–205, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Dowling JE, Dubin MW: The vertebrate retina, in Darian-Smith I (ed), Handbook of Physiology. Balti¬more, American Physiological Society, 1984.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Masland RH: The functional architecture of the retina. Scient Am 254(12): 1Q2–111, 1986.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Bishop PO: Processing of visual information within the retinostriate system, in Darian-Smith I (ed), Handbook of Physiology. Baltimore, American Psychological Society, 1984.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Mansfield RJW: Neural basis of orientation perception. Science 186:1133–1135, 1974.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Mansfield RJW, Ronner SF: Orientation anisotropy in monkey vision. Brain Res 149:229–231, 1978.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Blakemore C, Campbell FW: On the existence of neurons in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images. J Physiol 203:237–260, 1969.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Watson AB, Robson JG: Discrimination at threshold: Labelled detectors in human vision. Vis Res 21:1115–1122, 1981.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Nachmias J, Weber A: Discrimination of simple and complex gratings. Vis Res 15:217–223, 1975.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Thomas JP, Gille J: Band widths of orientation channels in human vision. J Opt Soc Am 69:652–660, 1979. PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Thomas JP, Gille J, Barker RA: Simultaneous detection and identification: Theory and data. J Opt Soc Am 72:1642–1651, 1982.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Graham N, Nachmias J; Detection of grating patterns containing two spatial frequencies: A comparison of single-channel and multiple-channel models. Vis Res 11:251–259, 1971.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Olzak L, Thomas JP: Why frequency discrimination is sometimes better than detection. J Opt Soc Am 71:64–70, 1981.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Wilson HR, McFarlane DK, Phillips GC: Spatial frequency tuning of orientation selective units estimated by oblique masking. Vis Res 23:873–882, 1983.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Hess R, Woo G: Vision through cataracts. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sei 17:428–435, 1978.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Ross JE: Clinical detection of abnormalities in cen¬tral vision in chronic simple glaucoma using contrast sensitivity. Int Ophthalmol 8:167–177, 1985.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Loshin DS, White J: Contrast sensitivity: The visual rehabilitation of the patient with macular degeneration. Arch Ophthalmol 102:1303–1306, 1984.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Fleishman JA, Beck RW, Linares OA, et al: Deficits in visual function after recovery from optic neuritis. Ophthalmology 94:1029–1035, 1987.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Kupersmith MJ, Siegel IM, Carr RE: Reduced contrast sensitivity in compressive lesions of the anterior visual pathway. Neurology 31:550–554, 1981.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Kupersmith MJ, Siegel IM, Carr RE: Subtle disturbances of vision with compressive lesions of the anterior visual pathway measured by contrast sensitivity. Ophthalmology 89:68–72, 1982.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Evans D, Ginsburg A: Contrast sensitivity predicts age-related differences in highway sign discrimina-bility. Hum Fact 27:637, 1985.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Howes SC, Caelli T, Mitchell P: Contrast sensitivity in diabetics with retinopathy and cataract. Aust J Ophthalmol 10:173–178, 1982.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Regan D, Silver R, Murray TJ: Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity in multiple sclerosis hidden visual loss: An auxiliary diagnostic test. Brain 100:563–579, 1977.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Hess RF, Plant GT: The psychophysical loss in optic neuritis: Spatial and temporal aspects, in Hess RF, Plant GT (eds), Optic Neuritis. Cambridge, England, University of Cambridge, 1986.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Pelli DG, Rubin GS, Legge GE: Predicting the contrast sensitivity of low vision observers. J Opt Soc Am-A 3:56, 1986.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Pelli DG, Robson JG, Wilkins AJ: The design of a new letter chart for measuring contrast sensitivity. Clin Vis Sei 2:187–199, 1988.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Corwin TR, Richman JE: Three clinical tests of the spatial contrast sensitivity function: A comparison. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 63:413–418, 1986.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeremy M. Wolfe

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations