Abstract
In the summer of 1985, Carl Bereiter published an article in the Review of Educational Research titled Toward a Solution of the Learning Paradox. Ever since, it has been my intention to provide a counterexample to the paradox. Fodor (1980b), who is credited by Bereiter as clearly stating the learning paradox, views learning as being necessarily inductive. “Let’s assume, once again, that learning is a matter of inductive inference, that is, a process of hypothesis formation1 and confirmation” (p. 148). Given his view of learning, Fodor states the learning paradox in the following way.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1991 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Steffe, L.P. (1991). The Learning Paradox: A Plausible Counterexample. In: Steffe, L.P. (eds) Epistemological Foundations of Mathematical Experience. Recent Research in Psychology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3178-3_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3178-3_3
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-97600-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-3178-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive