Abstract
Recordings were made simultaneously from many electrodes placed on and in the hearts of animals to study the basic principles of ventricular defibrillation. The findings are listed below. Earliest activations following a shock slightly lower in strength than needed to defibrillate (a subthreshold defibrillation shock) occur in those cardiac regions in which the potential gradients generated by the shock are weakest. Activation fronts after subthreshold shocks do not appear to be continuations of activation fronts present just before the shock. An upper limit exists to the strength of shocks that induce fibrillation when given during the “vulnerable period” of regular rhythm. This upper limit of vulnerability correlates with and is similar in strength to the defibrillation threshold. To defibrillate, a shock must halt the activation fronts of fibrillation without giving rise to new activation fronts that reinduce fibrillation. The response to shocks during regular rhythm just below the upper limit of vulnerability is similar to the response to subthreshold defibrillation shocks. Shocks during regular rhythm initiate rotors of reentrant activation leading to fibrillation when a critical point is formed, at which a certain critical value of shock potential gradient field strength intersects a certain critical degree of myocardial refractoriness. This critical point may explain the existence of the upper limit of vulnerability. The critical point may also partially explain the finding that the relationship between shock strength and the success of the shock in halting fibrillation is better represented by a probability function rather than by a discrete threshold value. Very high potential gradients, approximately an order of magnitude greater than needed for defibrillation, have detrimental effects on the heart, including conduction block, induction of arrhythmias, decreased wall motion, and tissue necrosis.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
M.A. Allessie, F.I.M. Bonke, and F.J.G. Schopman. Circus movement in rabbit atrial muscle as a mechansim of tachycardia. III. The “leading circle” concept: A new model of circus movement in cardiac tissue without the involvment of an anatomical obstacle. Circ. Res., 41: 9–18, 1977.
C. Antzelevitch and G.K. Moe. Electronic inhibition and summation of impulse conduction in mammalian sinoatrial node. Am. J. Physiol., 245: H42-H53, 1983.
M.F. Arnsdorf, D.A. Rothbaum, and R.W. Childers. Effect of direct current countershock on atrial and ventricular electrophysiological properties and myocardial potassium efflux in the thoracotomised dog. Cardiovas. Res., 11: 324–333, 1977.
J.D. Bourland, W.A. Tacker Jr., and L.A. Geddes. Strength-duration curves for trapezoidal waveforms of various tilts for transchest defibrillation in animals. Med. Insirum., 12: 38–41, 1978.
M.S. Chang, H. Inoue, M.J. Kallok, and D.P. Zipes. Double and triple sequential shocks reduce ventricular defibrillation threshold in dogs with and without myocardial infarction. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., 8: 1393, 1986.
P-S Chen, N. Shibata, E.G. Dixon, R.O. Martin, and R.E. Ideker. Comparison of the defibrillation threshold and the upper limit of ventricular vulnerability. Circulation, 73: 1022–1028, 1986.
P-S Chen, N. Shibata, E.G. Dixon, et al. Activation during ventricular defibrillation in open-chest dogs: Evidence of complete cessation and regeneration of ventricular fibrillation after unsuccessful shocks. J. Clin. Invest., 77: 810–823, 1986.
P-S Chen, N. Shibata, P.D. Wolf, et al. Epicardial activiation during successful and unsuccessful ventricular defibrillation in open chest dogs. Cardiovasc. Rev. Rep., 7: 625–648, 1986.
P-S Chen, P.D. Wolf, S.D. Melnick, N.D. Danieley, W.M. Smith, and R.E. Ideker. Comparison of activation during ventricular fibrillation and following unsuccessful defibrillation shocks in open chest dogs. Circ. Res., 66: 1544–1560, 1990.
P-S Chen, P.D. Wolf, F.J. Claydon, et al. The potential gradient field created by epicardial defibrillation electrodes in dogs. Circulation, 74: 626–636, 1986.
C.F. Dahl, G.A. Ewy, E.D. Warner, and E.D. Thomas. Myocardial necrosis from direct current countershock, effect of paddle size and time interval between discharge. Circulation, 50: 956–961, 1974.
J.P. Daubert, D.W. Frazier, W. Krassowska, S. Yabe, W.M. Smith, and R.E. Ideker. Direct excitation of relatively refractory tissue by monophasic and biphasic shocks (abstract). J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., 13: 2l5A, 1989.
J.M. Davy, E.S. Fain, P. Dorian, and R.A. Winkle. The relationship between successful defibrillation and delivered energy in open-chest dogs: Reappraisal of the “defibrillation threshold” concept. Am. Heart J., 113: 77–84, 1987.
E.G. Dixon, A.S.L. Tang, et al. Improved defibrillation thresholds with large contoured epicardial electrodes and biphasic waveforms. Circulation, 76: 1176–1184, 1987.
J. Dudel. Elektrophysiologische grundlagen der defibrillation und künstlichen stimulation des herzens. Med. Klin., 52: 2089–2100, 1968.
N. El-Sherif, W.B. Gough, and M. Restivo. Rentrant ventricular arrhythmias in the late myocardial infarction period: 14. Mechansims of resetting, entrainment, acceleration, or terminiation of reentrant tachycardia by programmed electrical stimulation. PACE, 10: 341–371, 1987.
N. El-Sherif, R.A. Smith, and K. Evans. Canine ventricular arrhythmias in the late myocardial infarction period: 8. Epicardial mapping of reentrant circuits. Circ. Res., 49: 255–265, 1981.
A. Fabiato, P. Coumel, R. Gourgon, and R. Saumont. Le seuil de réponse synchrone des fibres myocardiques. application à la comparison experimental de l’efficacité des difiérentes formes de chocs électriques de défibrillation. Arch. Mal Coeur, 60: 527–544, 1967.
D.W. Frazier, P.D. Wolf, J.M. Wharton, A.S.L. Tang, W.M. Smith, and R.E. Ideker. Stimulus-induced critical point: Mechanism for the electrical initiation of reentry in normal canine myocardium. J. Clin. Invest., 83: 1039–1052, 1989.
W.E. Gaum, V. Elharrar, P.D. Walker, and D.P. Zipes. Influence of excitability on the ventricular fibrillation threshold in dogs. Am. J. Cardiol., 40: 929–939, 1977.
J.H. Gold, J.C. Schuder, and H. Stoeckle. Contour graph for relating per cent success in achieving ventricualr defibrillation to duration, current, and energy content of shock. Am. Heart J., 98: 207–212, 1979.
B.F. Hoffman, E.F. Gorin, F.S. Wax, A.A. Siebens, and C.M. Brooks. Vulnerability to fibrillation and the ventricular-excitability curve. Am. J. Physiol., 167: 88–94, 1951.
B.F. Hoffman, E.E. Suckling, and C.M. Brooks. Vulnerability of the dog ventricle and effects of defibrillation. Circ. Res., 3: 147–151, 1955.
D.R. Hooker, W.B. Kouwenhoven, and O.R. Langworthy. The effect of alternating currents on the heart. Am. J. Physiol., 103: 444–454, 1933.
R.E. Ideker, G.J. Klein, L. Harrison, et al. The transition to ventricular fibrillation induced by reperfusion following acute ischemia in the dog: A period of organized epicardial activation. Circulation, 63: 1371–1379, 1981.
R.E. Ideker, A.S.L. Tang, D.W. Frazier, N. Shibata, P-S Chen, and J.M. Wharton. Ventricular defibrillation: Basic concepts. In N. El-Sherif and P. Samet, editors, Cardiac Pacing, pages 713–726. Saunders, Orlando, 1991.
J. Jalife and C. Antzelevitch. Phase resetting and annihilation of pacemaker activity in cardiac tissue. Science, 206: 696–697, 1979.
J. Jalife, V.A.J. Slenter, J.J. Salata, and D.C. Michaels. Dynamic vagal control of pacemaker activity in the mammalian sinoatrial node. Circ. Res., 52: 642–656, 1983.
D.L. Jones, G.J. Klein, G.M. Guiraudon, et al. Internal cardiac defibrillation in man: pronounced improvement with sequential pulse delivery to two different lead orientations. Circulation, 73: 484–491, 1986.
D.L. Jones, A. Sohla, and G.J. Klein. Internal cardiac defibrillation threshold: effects of acute ischemia. PACE, 9: 322–331, 1986.
J.L. Jones, E. Lepeschkin, R.E. Jones, and S. Rush. Response of cultured myocardial cells to countershock-type electric field stimulation. Am. J. Physiol., 235: H214-H222, 1978.
J.L. Jones, C.C. Proskauer, W.K. Paull, E. Lepeschkin, and R.E. Jones. Ultrastructural injury to chick myocardial cells in vitro following “electric countershock.” Circ. Res., 46: 387–394, 1980.
K.M. Kavanagh, A.S.L. Tang, D.L. Rollins, W.M. Smith, and R.E. Ideker. Comparison of the internal defibrillation thresholds for monophasic and double and single capacitor biphasic waveforms. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., 14: 1343–1349, 1989.
B.G. King. The Effect of Electric Shock on Heart Action with Special Reference to Varying Susceptibility in Different Parts of the Cardiac Cycle. Ph.D. thesis, Columbia University, 1934.
G. Koning, A.H. Veefkind, and H. Schneider. Cardiac damage caused by direct application of defibrillation shock to isolated Langendorffperfused rabbit heart. Am. Heart J., 100: 473–482, 1980.
W. Krassowska, T.C. Pilkington, and R.E. Ideker. Periodic conductivity as a mechanism for cardiac stimulation and defibrillation. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., BME-34: 555–560, 1987.
C. Laxer, R.E. Ideker, W.M. Smith, L.D. German, L. Harrison, and T.C. Pilkington. Computer acquisition of a database for relating myocardial infarct geometry to cardiac electrical potentials. Proc. Comp. Cardiol., 339–342, 1980.
E. Lepeschkin, J.L. Jones, S. Rush, and R.E. Jones. Local potential gradients as a unifying measure for thresholds of stimulation, standstill, tachyarrhythmia and fibrillation appearing after strong capacitor discharges. Adv. Cardiol., 21: 268–278, 1978.
C. Lesigne, B. Levy, R. Saumont, P. Birkui, A. Bardou, and B. Rubin. An energy-time analysis of ventricular fibrillation and defibrillation thresholds with internal electrodes. Med. Biol. Eng., 14: 617–622, 1976.
B. Lown. Electrical reversion of cardiac arrhythmias. Br. Heart J., 29: 469–489, 1976.
W.C. McDaniel and J.C. Schuder. The cardiac ventricular defibrillation threshold: Inherent limitations in its application and interpretation. Med. Instrum., 21: 170–176, 1987.
M. Mirowski. The automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: An overview. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., 6: 461–466, 1985.
G.K. Moe, W.C. Rheinboldt, and J.A. Abildskov. A computer model of atrial fibrillation. Am. Heart J., 67: 200–220, 1964.
E.N. Moore and J.F. Spear. Electrophysiologic studies on the initiation prevention, and termination of ventricular fibrillation, In D.P. Zipes and J. Jalife, editors, Cardiac Electrophysiology and Arrhythmias, pages 315–322. Grune Stratton, Orlando, 1985.
M.M. Mower, M. Mirowski, J.F. Spear, and E.N. Moore. Patterns of ventricular activity during catheter defibrillation. Circulation, 49: 858–861, 1974.
M.J. Niebauer, C.F. Babbs, L.A. Geddes, and J.D. Bourland. Efficacy and safety of the reciprocal pulse defibrillator current waveform. Med. Biol. Eng. Comp., 22: 28–31, 1984.
O. Orias, C.M. Brooks, E.E. Suckling, J.L. Gilbert, and A.A. Siebens. Excitability of the mammalian ventricle throughout the cardiac cycle. Am. J. Physiol., 163: 272–232, 1950.
D.G. Pansegrau and F.M. Abboud. Hemodynamic effects of ventricular defibrillation. J. Clin. Invest., 49: 282–297, 1970.
B. Peleska. Cardiac arrhythmias following condenser discharges and their dependence upon strength of current and phase of cardiac cycle. Circ. Res., 13: 21–32, 1963.
R. Plonsey and R.C. Barr. Inclusion of junction elements in a linear cardiac model through secondary sources: Application to defibrillation. Med. Biol. Eng. Comp., 24: 137–144, 1986.
S.M. Pogwizd and P.B. Corr. Reentrant and nonreentrant mechanisms contribute to arrhythmogenesis during early myocardial ischemia: Results using three-dimensional mapping. Circ. Res., 61: 352–371, 1987.
N. Shibata, P-S Chen, E.G. Dixon, et al. Epicardial activation following unsuccessful defibrillation shocks in dogs. Am. J. Physiol., 255: H902-H909, 1988.
N. Shibata, P-S Chen, E.G. Dixon, et al. Epicardial mapping of the initiation of ventricular fibrillation by shocks during the vulnerable period (abstract). J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., 7: 183A, 1986.
N. Shibata, P-S Chen, E.G. Dixon, et al. Influence of shock strength and timing on induction of ventricular arrhythmias in dogs. Am. J. Physiol., 255: H891-H901, 1988.
W.M. Smith and R.E. Ideker. Computer techniques for epicardial and endocardial mapping. Prog. Cardiovasc. Dis., 26: 15–32, 1983.
A.S.L. Tang, P.D. Wolf, W.M. Claydon III, F.J. Smith, T.C. Pilkington, and R.E. Ideker. Measurement of defibrillation shock potential distributions and activation sequences of the heart in three dimensions. Proc. IEEE, 76: 1176–1186, 1988.
J.M. Wharton, V.J. Richard, C.E. Murry, D.L. Rollins, K.A. Reimer, and R.E. Ideker. Effect of chronic myocardial infarction on defibrillation (abstract). Circulation, 76: IV-108, 1987.
J.M. Wharton, P.D. Wolf, P-S Chen, et al. Is an absolute minimum potential gradient required for ventricular defibrillation? (abstract). Circulation, 74: II-342, 1986.
C.J. Wiggers. The mechanism and nature of ventricular defibrillation. Am. Heart J., 20: 399, 1940.
C.J. Wiggers. The physiologic basis for cardiac resuscitation from ventricular fibrillation-Method for serial defibrillation. Am. Heart J., 20: 413, 1940.
C.J. Wiggers and R. Wegria. Ventricular fibrillation due to single, localized induction and condenser shocks applied during the vulnerable phase of ventricular systole. Am. J. Physiol., 128: 500–505, 1940.
A.T. Winfree. Spiral waves of chemical activity. Science, 175: 634–636, 1972.
A.T. Winfree. Sudden cardiac death. Sci. Am., 248: 144–161, 1983.
A.T. Winfree. Unclocklike behavior of biological clocks. Nature, 253: 315–319, 1975.
A.T. Winfree. When Time Breaks Down: The Three-Dimensional Dynamics of Electrochemical Waves and Cardiac Arrhythmias. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1987.
A.L. Wit, M.A. Allessie, F.I.M. Bonke, W. Lammers, J. Smeets, and J.J. Fenoglio Jr. Electrophysiologic mapping to determine the mechanism of experimental ventricular tachycardia initiated by premature impulses: experimental approach and initial results demonstrating reentrant excitation. Am. J. Cardiol., 49: 166–185, 1982.
F.X. Witkowski and P.A. Penkoske. Relation of defibrillatory potential minima to post-defibrillatory activation. In Proc. 10th Annual Conf. of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, pages 212–213, 1988.
F.X. Witkowski and P.A. Penkoske. Simultaneous cardiac potential field and direct cardiac recordings during ventricular defibrillation (DF) (abstract). Circulation, 76: IV-108, 1987.
P.D. Wolf, D.L. Rollins, W.M. Smith, and R.E. Ideker. A cardiac mapping system for the quantitative study of internal defibrillation. In Proc. 10th Annual Conf. of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, pages 217–218, 1988.
S. Yabe, W.M. Smith, J.P. Daubert, P.D. Wolf, D.L. Rollins, and R.E. Ideker. Conduction disturbances caused by high current density electric fields. Circ. Res., 66: 1190–1203, 1990.
X. Zhou, P-S. Chen, P.D. Wolf, W.M. Smith, and R.E. Ideker. Activation patterns following unsuccessful defibrillation shocks (abstract). Circulation, 80: II-135, 1989. Presented at the 62nd Scientific Sessions of the American Heart Association, November, 1989.
X. Zhou, J.P. Daubert, P.D. Wolf, W.M. Smith, and R.E. Ideker. The potential gradient for defibrillation (abstract). Circulation, 78: II–645, 1988.
X. Zhou, P.D. Wolf, D.L. Rollins, W.M. Smith, and R.E. Ideker. Potential gradient needed for defibrillation with monophasic and biphasic shocks (abstract). PACE, 12: 651, 1989.
D.P. Zipes, J. Fischer, R.M. King, A. Nicoll, and W.W. Jolly. Termination of ventricular fibrillation in dogs by depolarizing a critical amount of myocardium. Am. J. Cardiol., 36: 37–44, 1975.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1991 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ideker, R.E., Tang, A.S.L., Frazier, D.W., Shibata, N., Chen, PS., Wharton, J.M. (1991). Basic Mechanisms of Ventricular Defibrillation. In: Glass, L., Hunter, P., McCulloch, A. (eds) Theory of Heart. Institute for Nonlinear Science. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3118-9_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3118-9_20
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-7803-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-3118-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive