Advertisement

New Gravimetric Geoid for Canada: The “UNB ’90” Solution

  • Petr Vaníček
  • Peng Ong
  • Zhang Changyou
Part of the International Association of Geodesy Symposia book series (IAG SYMPOSIA, volume 106)

Abstract

As data coverage and quality, and global models derived from satellite orbit analysis become more accurate, regional geoid solutions should be upgraded. This paper describes the upgrade of our “UNB Dec. ’86” solution for Canada carried out under a contractual arrangement with the Federal Government of Canada.

Keywords

Gravity Anomaly Bouguer Anomaly Geoidal Height Orthometric Height Terrestrial Gravity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Kleusberg, A. and P. Vaníček, 1990, The role of topography in Helmert’s second condensation method, Manuscripta Geodaetica (Submitted).Google Scholar
  2. Lachapelle, G., 1978, Evaluation of 1° x 1° mean free air gravity anomalies in Noerh MWEIX, Collected Papers, Geodetic Survey of Canada, Surveys and Mapping, EMR, Ottawa, pp. 183–213.Google Scholar
  3. Mainville, A. and M. Véronneau, 1989a, Creating a gravity grid over Canada using Bouguer anomalies and a digital elevation model. Presented at the Canadian Geophysical Union Annual Meeting, Montreal, Quebec, May.Google Scholar
  4. Mainville, A., and M. Véronneau, 1989b, Orthometric Heights Using GPS, Annual Meeting of CISM, Halifax, June.Google Scholar
  5. Mainville, A. and M. Véronneau, 1990, Personal Communication.Google Scholar
  6. Marsh, J.G., F.J. Lerch, B.H. Putney, D.C. Christodoulidis, D.E. Smith, T.L. Flesentreger, B.V. Sanchez, S.M. Klosko, E.C. Pavlis, T.V. Martin, J.W. Robbins, R.G. Williamson, O.L. Colombo, D.D. Rowlands, W.F. Eddy, N.L. Chandler, K.E. Rachlin, G.B. Patel, S. Bhati, and D.S. Chinn, 1988, A new gravitational model for the earth from satellite tracking data: GEM-T1. Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 93, No. B6, pp. 6169–6215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Robinson, G., 1990, Verification of gravimetric geoidal models by a combination of GPS and orthometric heights, M.Sc. Thesis, Department of Surveying Engineering, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton.Google Scholar
  8. Sideris, M., and K.P. Schwarz, 1985, Computation of geoidal undulations and deflections of the vertical for Alberta, Contract Report No. 85001 of the Survey Control Branch, Alberta Bureau of Surveying and Mapping, Edmonton, 33 pages.Google Scholar
  9. Sjöberg, L.E., 1988, Personal communication.Google Scholar
  10. Sjöberg, L.E., and P. Vaníček, 1990. Reformulation of Stokes’s theory for higher than second-degree reference field and modification of integration kernels. Journal of Geophysical Research, (Submitted)Google Scholar
  11. Vaníček, P. and A. Kleusberg, 1987, The Canadian Geoid - Stokesian approach, Manuscripta Geodaetica, No. 12, pp. 86–98Google Scholar
  12. Wang, Y. M. and R. H. Rapp, 1990, Terrain effects on geoid undulation computations. Manuscripta Geodaetica, 15 (1), pp. 23–29.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Petr Vaníček
    • 1
  • Peng Ong
    • 1
  • Zhang Changyou
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Surveying EngineeringUniversity of New BrunswickFrederictonCanada
  2. 2.Department of Surveying EngineeringUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryCanada

Personalised recommendations