Advertisement

Functional Esthetics to Enhance Weil-Being in Isolated and Confined Settings

  • Yvonne A. Clearwater
  • Richard G. Coss
Conference paper

Abstract

As the technology for providing living and working settings in space and other remote environments has evolved, the focus of mission planners and facility designers alike has expanded from concerns for survivability to an emphasis on the achievement of human goals and a resulting sense of well-being (Clearwater, 1988). Requirements for habitability—the level of environmental acceptability—change dramatically with circumstances. For short periods of time, almost any arrangement may be viewed as acceptable to highly motivated individuals, as long as they are assured of staying alive and physically fit enough to perform their work. For longer stays, however, conditions must support psychological as well as physical health. In discussion of Soviet aviation ergonomics, Bugayev and Denisov (1976) attribute the quality of systems operations not only to the capabilities of the operator but also to the influence of the environment, the character and conditions of the work, and the interactions of the operator and the machine.

Keywords

Motion Sickness Photographic Print Physiological Arousal Landscape Painting Apparent Depth 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Balling, J. D., & Falk, J. H. (1982). Development of visual preferences for natural environments. Environment and Behavior, 14, 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barbour, C. G., & Coss, R. G. (1988). Differential color brightness as a body orientation cue. Human Factors, 30(6), 713–717.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Beatty, J. (1982). Task-evoked pupillary responses, processing load, and the structure of processing resources. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 276–292.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beatty, J., & Wagoner, B. L. (1978). Pupillometric signs of brain activation vary with level of cognitive processing. Science, 199, 1216–1218.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berlyne, D. E. (1971). Aesthetics and psychobiology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  6. Bluth, B. J. (1981). Soviet space stress. Science 81, 2, 30–35.Google Scholar
  7. Bluth, B. J. (1986). Soviet space stations as analogs (2nd ed.) (Final Report NASA Grant NAGW-659). Washington DC: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.Google Scholar
  8. Bray, J. H., & Maxwell, S. E. (1985). Multivariate analysis of variance. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  9. Bugayev, V. P., & Denisov, V. G. (1976). Pilot i samolet: Aviatsionnaya eronmika [Pilot and plane: Aviation ergonomics]. Moscow: Mashinostroyeniye.Google Scholar
  10. Buhyoff, G. J., Wellman, J. D., & Daniel, T. C. (1982). Predicting scenic quality for mountain pine beetle and western spruce budworm damaged forest vistas. Forest Science, 28, 827–838.Google Scholar
  11. Clearwater, Y. A. (1988). Space station habitability research. Acta Astronautica, 17(2), 217–222.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Connors, M. M., Harrison, A. A., & Akins, F. R. (1985). Living aloft: Human requirements for extended spaceflight. (NASA SP-483) Washington D. C: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.Google Scholar
  13. Coss, R. G. (1970). The perceptual aspects of eye-spots patterns and their relevance to gaze behaviour. In C. Hutt & S. J. Hutt (Eds.), Behavioural studies in psychiatry (pp. 121–147). London: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  14. Coss, R. G. & Towers, S. R. (1990). Provocative aspects of pictures of animals in confined settings. Anthrozoös, 3, 162–170.Google Scholar
  15. Evans, G. W., Stokols, D., Carrere, S. (1988). Human adaptation to isolated and confined environments: Preliminary findings of a seven month Antarctic winter-over human factors study (NASA Contractor Report 177499). Mountain View, CA: NASA-Ames.Google Scholar
  16. Gurovskiy, N. N., Kosmolinskiy, F. P., & Mel’nikov, L. N. (1980) Proyektirovaniye usloviy zhizni i raboty kosmonavtov. Moscow: MashinostroyeniyeGoogle Scholar
  17. Hauty, G. (1964). Sensory deprivation. In K. E. Schaefer (Ed.), Bioastronautics (pp. 200–224). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  18. Heron, W., Doane, B. K., & Scott, T. H. (1956). Visual disturbances after prolonged perceptual isolation. Canadian Journal of Perception, 10, 13–18.Google Scholar
  19. Hess, E. H. (1972). Pupillometrics. In N. S. Greenfield & R. A. Sternbach (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology (pp. 491–531). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  20. Hess, E. H. (1975). The tell-tale eye. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
  21. Hull, B. R., IV, & Buhyoff, G. J. (1983). Distance and scenic beauty, a nonmonotonic relationship. Environment and Behavior, 15, 77–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Johnson, C. C. (1974). Skylab experiment M487: Habitability/crew quarters. Paper number 74–133 presented at the American Astronautical Society Annual Meeting.Google Scholar
  23. Kidger, N. (1979). The Salyut 6 space station. Spaceflight, 21, 178–183.Google Scholar
  24. Konovalov, B. (1982, August 17). New features of Salyut-7 station. USSR Report No. 17, 6–8.Google Scholar
  25. Kosslyn, S. M. (1987). Seeing and imagining in the cerebral hemispheres: A computational approach. Psychological Review, 94, 148–175.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lyons, E. (1983). Demographic correlates of landscape preference. Environment and Behavior, 15, 487–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mel’nikov, L. N. (1970). Color formulations in small enclosed spaces. In Problemy sensornoy izolayatsii [Problems of sensory isolation] pp. 121–125. Moscow: Izd., Instituta Psikhologii.Google Scholar
  28. Mel’nikov, L. N. (1978). Komnaty psikhologicheskoy razgruzki [Psychological relief rooms]. Mashinostroitel, 1, 33–34.Google Scholar
  29. Natani, K., & Shurley, J. T. (1974). Sociopsychological aspects of a winter vigil at South Pole Station. In E. K. E. Gunderson (Ed.), Human adaptability to Antarctic conditions. Antarctic Research Series, Vol. 22 (pp. 89–114). Worcester MA: Heffeman Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Oman, C. M., Lichtenberg, B. K., Money, K. E., & McCoy, R. K. (1986). MIT/Canadian vestibular experiments on the Spacelab-1 mission: 4. Space motion sickness. Experimental Brain Research, 64, 316–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Patsfall, M. R., Feimer, N. R., Buhyoff, G. J., & Wellman, J. D. (1984). The prediction of scenic beauty from landscape content and composition. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 4, 7–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Persky, H., Zuckerman, M., Basu, G. K., & Thornton, D. (1966). Psychoendocrine effects of perceptual and social isolation. Archives of General Psychiatry 15, 499–505.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Suedfeld, P. (1980). Restricted environmental stimulation. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  34. Tuan, Y.-F. (1978). Children and the natural environment. In I. Altman & J. F. Wohlwill (Eds.), Human behavior and environment, Vol.3 (pp. 5–32). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  35. Ulrich, R. S. (1977). Visual landscape preference: A model and application. Man-Environment Systems, 7, 279–293.Google Scholar
  36. Ulrich, R. S. (1981). Nature versus urban scenes, some psychophysiological effects. Environment and Behavior, 13, 523–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ulrich, R. S. (1983). Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment. In I. Altman & J. F. Wohlwill (Eds.), Human behavior and environment, Vol. 6 (pp. 85–125). NY: Plenum.Google Scholar
  38. Ulrich, R. S. (1984). View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science, 224, 420–421.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Weybrew, B. B., & Noddin, E. M. (1979). Psychiatric aspects of adaptation to long submarine missions. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 50, 575–580.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Zubeck, J. P. (1973). Behavioral and physiological effects of prolonged sensory and perceptual deprivation: A review. In J. E. Rasmussen (Ed.), Man in isolation and confinement (pp. 9–84). Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  41. Zubkov, V. (1982). Post-flight interview with Berezevoy and Lebedev. Interview translated from Sotsialisticheskaya Industriya, 1982, December 26, p. 4.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yvonne A. Clearwater
  • Richard G. Coss

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations