Skip to main content

Common Factor Model Stochastic Model, Data Analysis Technique or What?

  • Conference paper
Advances in GLIM and Statistical Modelling

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Statistics ((LNS,volume 78))

  • 557 Accesses

Abstract

Factor analysis is a very frequently used methodology. Users not only in the social sciences but also in geography, medicine, chemistry, biology and economics like it. There are mainly two interpretations of the common factor analysis model as a data analytic procedure or as a stochastic model:

  • The common factor analysis as a data analytic procedure. In this case the common factors and the parameters have no substantial meaning. They just serve to represent the observable variables, as it is, for instance, done by the principal components.

  • The common factor analysis model as a causal model. In this case the unobservable common factors are considered as “true” indipendent variables linked by a linear relation with the observable variables. The common factors and the factor loadings are “true” as the regressors and the parameters in the regression model. As in the regression model, the true parameters are to be estimated with the observations on the variables. Furthermore the determination of the common factor scores is of great importance, because the parameters have only a substantial meaning knowing the underlying factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson, T.W., Rubin, H. (1956). Statistical inference in factor analysis. Proceedings of the Third Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability 5, 111–150. Univ. California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Efflers, H., Bethlehem, J., and Gill, R. (1978). Indeterminacy problems and the interpretation of factor analysis results. Statistica Neerlandica 32, 181–199.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gorsuch, R.L. (1990). Common Factor Analysis versus Component Analysis: Some Well and Little Known Facts. Multivariate Behavioral Research 25, 33–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haagen, K. and Oberhofer, W. (1992). On the Indeterminacy in the Common Factor Model. Technical Report 36, Dept. of Statistics, University of Trento, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kano, Y. (1984). Construction of Additional Variables Conforming to a Common Factor Model. Statistics & Probability Letters 2, 241–244.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Loehlin, J.C. (1990). Component Analysis versus Common Factor Analysis: A Case of Disputed Authorship. Multivariate Behavioral Research 25, 29–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, R.P. (1977). The Indeterminacy of Components and the Definition of Common Factors. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 30, 165–170.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Mulaik, St. A. (1990). Blurring the Distinction Between Component Analysis and Common Factor Analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research 25, 53–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oberhofer, W., and Haagen, K. (1991). The Replicated Common Factor Model. Technical Report 145, Dept. of Economics, University of Regensburg, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, C. R: (1973). Linear Statistical Inference and Its Applications, 2 nd Ed. Wiley, New York.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Schönemann, P.H. (1990). Facts, Fictions and Common Sense About Factors and Components. Multivariate Behavioral Research 25, 47–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steiger, J.H. (1979). Factor Indeterminacy in the 1930s and in the 1970s. Some Interesting Parallels. Psychometrika 44, 157–167.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Steiger, J.H., and Schönemann, P.H. (1978). A History of Factor Indeterminacy,. in She, S. (E.). Theory Construction and Data Analysis, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiger, J.H. (1990). Some additional thoughts on components, factors and factor indeterminacy. Multivariate Behavioral Research 25, 41–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Velicer, W.F. and Jackson, D.N. (1990) Component Analysis versus Common Factor Analysis: Some Issues in Selecting an Appropriate Procedure. Multivariate Behavioral Research 25, 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J.S. (1978). A Definition for the Common Factor Analysis Model and the Elimination of Problems of Factor Score Indeterminacy. Psychometrika 43, 293–306.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J.S. (1979). A Synthetic Basis for a Comprehensive Factor-Analysis Theory. Biometrics 35, 719–733.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Oberhofer, W., Haagen, K. (1992). Common Factor Model Stochastic Model, Data Analysis Technique or What?. In: Fahrmeir, L., Francis, B., Gilchrist, R., Tutz, G. (eds) Advances in GLIM and Statistical Modelling. Lecture Notes in Statistics, vol 78. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2952-0_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2952-0_24

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-97873-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-2952-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics