Skip to main content

Homogeneity of Subpopulations for Two-By-Two Contingency Tables

  • Conference paper
Bayesian Analysis in Statistics and Econometrics

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Statistics ((LNS,volume 75))

  • 689 Accesses

Abstract

Pooling of information from subpopulations achieves data compactification but some characteristics of the data are lost in the process. The greatest danger in amalgamating contingency tables is the possibility of a resulting paradox. Many such paradoxes have been noted since 1903 when Yule first noticed this phenomenon. We note three types of paradoxes. The definition of homogeneity proposed here is a sufficient condition to avoid Yule’s Reversal Paradox. We look at interpretations of this definition and some examples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bishop, Y. M. M., Fienberg, S. E., and Holland, P. W. (1975), Discrete Multivariate Analysis: Theory and Practice, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. and London.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M. R. and Nagel, E. (1934), An Introduction to Logic and Scientific Method, Harcourt, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cornfield, J. (1956), “A statistical problem arising from retrospective studies,” Proceedings of the 3rd Berkeley Symposium, 4, 135–148.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, D. R. (1970), Analysis of Binary Data, Methuen, London.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dorn, H. F. (1954), “The relationship of cancer of the lung and the use of tobacco,” The American Statistician, 8, 7–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Good, I. J. and Mittal, Y. (1987), “The amalgamation and geometry of two-by-two contingency tables,” The Annals of Statistics, 15, 694–711.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lindley, D. V. and Novick, M. R. (1981), “On role of exchangeability in inference,” The Annals of Statistics, 9, 45–58.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Messick, D. M. and Van de Geer, J. P. (1981), “A reversal paradox,” Psychology Bulletin, 90, 582–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, S. H. (1982), “Collapsing contingency tables — A geometric approach,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 36, 43–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, R. J. and Innes, J. T. (1985), “On Simpson’s paradox in economic statistics,” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 47, 387–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yule, G. U. (1903), “Notes on the theory of association of attributes in statistics,” Biometrika, 2, 121–134. Reprinted in Statistical Papers of George Udny Yule, 71-84, Griffin, London.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittemore, Alice S. (1978), “Collapsibility of multidimensional contingency tables,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Ser.B, 40 328–340.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mittal, Y. (1992). Homogeneity of Subpopulations for Two-By-Two Contingency Tables. In: Goel, P.K., Iyengar, N.S. (eds) Bayesian Analysis in Statistics and Econometrics. Lecture Notes in Statistics, vol 75. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2944-5_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2944-5_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-97863-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-2944-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics