The Discovery of Group Polarization

  • Serge Moscovici


I never had the pleasure of meeting Muzafer Sherif. Strangely enough, it was in Paris, at the start of my career, that I became acquainted with one of his former students, Madame Rosette Avigdor. She mentioned his courageous attitude in Turkey during World War II and his active sympathy toward the Jews under the difficult circumstances of that time.


Social Psychology Social Influence Group Polarization Group Decision Black Body Radiation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abelson, P. (1965). Relation of group activity to creativity in science. Daedalus, 94, 603–614.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, N. H., & Grauser, C. C. (1976). An information integration analysis of attitude change in group discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 210–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown, R. (1986). Social Psychology. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  4. Burnstein, E., & Vinokur, A. (1975). What a person thinks upon learning he has chosen differently from other: Nice evidence for the persuasive arguments explanation of choice shifts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11, 412–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cartwright, D., & Zander, A. (Eds.) (1953). Group dynamics: Research and theory. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  6. Davis, J. H. (1973). Group decision and social interaction: A theory of social decision schemes. Psychological Review, 80, 97–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Davis, J. H. (1982). Social interaction as a combinatorial process in group. In H. Brandstätter, J. Davis, & G. Stocker-Kreichgauer (Eds.), Group decision making (pp. 27–58). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  8. Doise, W. (1969). Intergroup relations and polarization of individual and collective judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 12, 136–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Doise, W., & Moscovici, S. (1984). Les décisions en groupe. In S. Moscovici (Ed.), Psychologie sociale (pp. 213–288). Paris: Presses Uuniversitaires de France.Google Scholar
  10. Durkheim, E. (1978). De la division du travail social. Paris: Presses Uuniversitaires de France (Original work published in 1893).Google Scholar
  11. Fraser, C. (1971). Group risk-taking and group polarization. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 493–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gramsci, A. (1953). Note sul Machiavelli. Turin, Einaudi.Google Scholar
  13. Hirokawa, R. Y., & Poole, M. S. (1986). Communication and group decisionmaking. New York: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  14. Jellison, J. M., & Riskind, J. (1970). A social comparison of abilities interpretation of risk-taking behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 15, 375–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kaplan, M. F., & Miller, CE. (1983). Group discussion and judgment. In B. P. Paulus (Ed.), Basic group processes. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  16. Kogan, N., & Wallach, M. (1966). Modification of a judgmental style through group interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 165–174.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Latané, B., Williams, K. & Harkins, S. (1977). Many hands make light the work. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 822–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lewin, K. (1943). Behind food habits and methods of change. Bulletin of the Research Council, No. 108.Google Scholar
  19. Lewin, K. (1982). Werkausgabe, 4th ed. Bern: Hans Huber.Google Scholar
  20. Moscovici, S. (1968). Essai sur l’histoire humaine de la nature, Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
  21. Moscovici, S. (1985). The age of the crowd. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Moscovici, S. (1989). Préalables à l’explication en psychologie sociale. European Journal of Social Psychology, 19, 407–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Moscovici, S., & Zavalloni, M. (1969). The group as a polarizer of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 12, 125–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Moscovici, S., Doise, W., & Dulong, R. (1972). Studies in group decision II: Differences of position, differences of opinion and group polarization. European Journal of Social Psychology, 2, 385–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Moscovici, S., & Lécuyer, R. (1972). Studies in group decision I: Social space, patterns of communication and group consensus. European Journal of Social Psychology, 2, 221–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Moscovici, S., Zavalloni, M., & Guérin, C. L. (1972). Studies on polarization of judgments I: Group effects on person perception. European Journal of Social Psychology, 2, 87–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Myers, D. G. (1978). Polarization effects on social comparison. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 554–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Myers, D. G., & Bishop, G. D. (1970). Discussion effects on racial attitudes. Science, 169, 778–779.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Myers, G. D., & Lamm, M. (1976). The group polarization phenomenon. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 602–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sherif, M. (1936). The psychology of social norms. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  31. Sherif, M., & Hovland, C. I. (1961). Social judgment. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Sherif, M., Harvey, O. J., White, B. J., Hood, W. R., & Sherif, C. W. (1961). Inter group conflict and cooperation: The robbers cave experiment. Norman: University of Oklahoma Book Exchange.Google Scholar
  33. Sherif, M., & Sherif, C. W. (1956). An outline of social psychology. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  34. Sherif, M., & Sherif, C. W. (1967). Attitude as the individual’s own categories: The social judgment-involvement approach to attitude and attitude change. In C. W. Sherif & M. Sherif (Eds.), Attitude, ego involvement and change (pp. 105–139). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  35. Vinokur, A., & Burastein, E. (1974). Effects of partially shared persuasive arguments on group induced shifts: A group problem-solving approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 305–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wallach, M. A., Kogan, N., & Bem, D. J. (1964). Diffusion of responsibility and level of risk taking in groups. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 68, 263–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Serge Moscovici

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations