Skip to main content

Constructive Processes as a Source of Context Effects in Survey Research: Explorations in Self-Generated Validity

  • Chapter
Context Effects in Social and Psychological Research

Abstract

Within the last several years, there has been an increasing realization that both bias and accuracy in responses to survey measures of many types (e.g., reports of behavior, expressions of attitude and preferences) are outcomes of fundamental cognitive and affective processes (e.g., Bradburn, Rips, & Shevell, 1987; Isen, 1989; Schwarz, 1990; Tourangeau & Rasinski, 1988).1 This concern with cognition parallels the study of context and framing effects in judgment and decision making (e.g., Hogarth, 1982, 1987; Kahneman, Slovic, & Tversky, 1982) and the general interest in response construction processes within cognition and social cognition (e.g., Barsalou, 1987; Higgins, 1989b; Petty & Cacioppo, 1986b; Srull & Wyer, 1989; T. D. Wilson, Dunn, Kraft, & Lisle, 1989). Research in “contingent decision processes,” as exemplified by J. W. Payne (1982), Feldman and Lindell (1990), and Biehal and Chakravarti (1983), is part of the same theme.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. The references included here and subsequently are intended to be illustrative rather than exhaustive.

    Google Scholar 

  2. This presentation will, of necessity, be highly abridged. Readers are urged to consult Feldman and Lynch (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Measures of memory organization, rating accuracy, etc., were also obtained but are not of immediate relevance. Also not discussed are the effects of delay on recall and recall-judgment correlations. Recall was scored in terms of “favorability of incident recalled,” with a favorable behavior = 1, unfavorable =-1, and neutral =0. These were summed for each subject, producing a “memory favorability” score.

    Google Scholar 

  4. A complete report is available from the author on request.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Order of rating/ranking was manipulated but did not affect the results. Other hypotheses considered in the complete article are not discussed here; readers are urged to contact the author for the complete study.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Feldman, J.M. (1992). Constructive Processes as a Source of Context Effects in Survey Research: Explorations in Self-Generated Validity. In: Schwarz, N., Sudman, S. (eds) Context Effects in Social and Psychological Research. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2848-6_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2848-6_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-7695-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-2848-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics