Olfaction and the Primitive: Nineteenth-Century Medical Thinking on Olfaction

  • Anne Harrington
  • Vernon Rosario

Abstract

In his social history of odor, The Foul and the Fragrant (1986), Alain Corbin notes the extent to which, historically, science and scholarship have been ambivalent in their attitudes towards the phenomena of olfaction. Subtle and not so subtle prejudices against this sensory organ can be traced, among other things, to its association with lust, desire, and impulsive sensuality, its links to the undignified sniffing behavior of animals, the poverty of human language to categorize and analyze the phenomena with which it is concerned, and its apparent relative uselessness in civilized society (Corbin, 1986: 6–7). At the same time, a counterpoint to this main song of disapproval has also left its trace on history: early students of animal behavior saluted olfaction as the primary organ of self-preservation; nineteenth-century men of letters elevated it to the privileged organ of feelings, recollection, and intimacy; it was the organ “capable of shaking man’s inner life more profoundly than were the senses of hearing or of sight. It seemed to reach to the roots of life” (Corbin, 1986: 7–8).

Keywords

Europe Cage Migraine Cocaine Neurol 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Althaus, J. (1881) A lecture on the physiology and pathology of the olfactory nerve. Lancet, 1: 771–773;Google Scholar
  2. Althaus, J. (1881) A lecture on the physiology and pathology of the olfactory nerve. Lancet, 1: 813–815.Google Scholar
  3. Bérillon, E. (1908) Psychologie de l’olfaction: la fascination olfactive chez les animaux et chez l’homme. Revue de l’Hypnotisme, October 1908, 98ff.Google Scholar
  4. Broca, P. (1877) Sur la circonvolution limbique et la scissure limbique. Bulletins de la Société d’Anthropologie. 12(2), 646–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Broca, P. (1878) Le grand lobe limbique et la scissure limbique. Revue d’Anthropologie, 1(2), 385–498.Google Scholar
  6. Broca, P. (1879) Anatomie du lobe olfactif. Bulletins de la Société d’Anthropologie, 4th ser., 4, 596–598.Google Scholar
  7. Broca, P. (1888) Mémoires sur le cerveau de l’homme et des primates, intro. by S. Pozzi. Paris: C Reinwald.Google Scholar
  8. Cabanis, G. (1805) Rapports du physique et du morale de l’homme. Paris.Google Scholar
  9. Cloquet, H. (1821) Osphrésiologie, ou Traité des odeurs, du sens et des organs de l’olfaction, avec l’histoire détaillée des maladies du nez et des fosses nasales et des opérations qui leur conviennent. 2d ed. Paris: Méquignon-Marvis.Google Scholar
  10. Cohen, J.S. (1884) Diseases of the Thorax and Nasal Passages. 2d ed. New York: William Wood & Co.Google Scholar
  11. Collet [no first name] (1904) L’Odorat et ses troubles. Paris: J.-B. Ballière.Google Scholar
  12. Corbin, A. (1986) The Foul and the Fragrant: Odor and the French Social Imagination. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press [originally published as Le miasme et la jonquille, Aubier Montaigne, 1982].Google Scholar
  13. Critchley, M. (1979) Man’s attitude to his nose. In The Divine Banquet of the Brain, and Other Essays. New York: Raven Press, pp. 106–114.Google Scholar
  14. Darwin, C. (1836–1844) Charles Darwin’s Notebooks, 1836–1844, P.H. Barrett, P.J. Gautrey, S. Herbert, D. Kohn, and S. Smith (Transcribers and eds.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
  15. Darwin, C. (1871) The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. New York: A.L. Burt.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Durant, J. (1985) The science of sentiment: the problem of the cerebral localization of emotion. In P.P.G. Bateson and P.H. Klopfer (Eds.), Perspectives in Ethology, Vol. 6: Mechanisms. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 1–31.Google Scholar
  17. Ellis, H. (1905) Sexual selection. In Studies in the Psychology of Sex. New York: Random House, 1936.Google Scholar
  18. Fliess, W. (1893a) Neue Beiträge zur Klinik und Therapie der nasalen Reflexneurose. Wien: F. Deuticke.Google Scholar
  19. Fliess, W. (1893b) Les réflexes d’origine nasale. Archives Internationales de Laryngologie, 6, 266–269.Google Scholar
  20. Fliess, W. (1897) Die Beziehungen zwischen Nase und weiblichen Geschlechtsorganen in ihrer biologischen Bedeutung dargestellt. Leipzig: F. Deuticke.Google Scholar
  21. Fliess, W. (1910) Über den ursächlichen Zusammenhang von Nase und Geschlechtsorgan. Zugleich ein Beitrag zur Nervenphysiologie. Halle: C. Marhold.Google Scholar
  22. Fraenkel, B. (1881) Uber den Zusammenhang von Asthma nervosum und Krankheit der Nase. Berliner Klinische Wochenschrift, 16, 217–220, 238–240.Google Scholar
  23. Freud, S. (1895) Project for a scientific psychology. In J. Strachey (Ed.), Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, 24 vols. London: Hogarth Press, Vol. 1.Google Scholar
  24. Freud, S. (1985) The Complete Letters of Sigmund Freud to Wilhelm Fliess, 1887–1904, J. Masson (Ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Fulton, J.F. (1938) Physiology of the Nervous System. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Gould, S.J. (1977) Ontogeny and Phytogeny. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Gould, S.J. (1981) The Mismeasure of Man. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  28. Gray, H.A.C. (1875) [Letter to the Editor] Sneezing. Lancet, Jan. 16, 1875, p. 110.Google Scholar
  29. Hack, W. (1882) Reflexneurosen und Nasenleiden. Berliner klinische Wochenschrift, 25, 379–384.Google Scholar
  30. Haeckel, E. (1874) Anthropogenie, oder Entwickelungsgeschichte des Menschen. Leipzig: W. Englemann.Google Scholar
  31. Hagen, A. (1901) Die sexuelle Osphresiologie. Oie Beziehungen des Geruchssinnes und der Gerüche zur menschlichen Geschlechtsthätigkeit (Supplementary volume to: Studien zur Geschichte des menschlichen Geschlechtslebens). Charlottenburg: H. Barsdorf.Google Scholar
  32. Harrington, A. (1987) Medicine, Mind and the Double Brain: A Study in Nineteenth-Century Thought. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Jackson, J.H. (1864) Unilateral epileptiform seizures beginning by a disagreeable smell. Medical Times and Gazette, Aug. 13, 1864, p. 168.Google Scholar
  34. Jackson, J.H. (1880–1881) On right or left-sided spasm at the onset of epileptic paroxysms, and on crude sensation warnings, and elaborate mental states. Brain, 3, 192–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kleist, K. (1934) Kriegsverletzungen des Gehirns in ihrer Bedevtung fūr die Hirnlokalisation und Hirnpathologie. In: Handbuch der ärztlichen Erfahrung im Weltkrieg, vol. 4, series O. von Schjerning (Ed.). 37 Leipzig: Barth.Google Scholar
  36. Knight, F.I. (1877) Case of anosmia following a blow on the occiput. Boston Med. Surg. J., 97, 293–301.Google Scholar
  37. Krafft-Ebing, R. von (1886) Psychopathia sexualis, Trans. H.E. Wedeck. New York: G.P. Putnam & Sons, 1965.Google Scholar
  38. Legg, J.W. (1873) A Case of Anosmia Following a Blow, Lancet, 2, 659–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. MacKenzie, J. (1884) Irritation of the sexual apparatus as an etiological factor in the production of nasal disease. Am. J. Med. Sci., April 1884, pp. 360–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. MacKenzie, J. (1886) The production of the so-called “rose cold” by means of an artificial rose, with remarks and historical notes. Am. J. Med. Sci. (January 1886) pp. 45–57.Google Scholar
  41. MacKenzie, J. (1898) The physiological and pathological relations between the nose and the sexual apparatus of man. J. Laryngol, Phonol. Otol., 13, 109–123.Google Scholar
  42. MacLean, P.D. (1949) Psychosomatic disease and the “visceral brain”: Recent developments bearing on the Papez theory of emotion. Psychosomatic Med., 11, 338–353.Google Scholar
  43. Maudsley, H. (1868) The Physiology and Pathology of Mind, 2d ed. 1878.Google Scholar
  44. Mayer, A. (1875) [Letter to the Editor] Ritual circumcision—Sneezing. Lancet, Jan. 9, 1875, p. 73.Google Scholar
  45. Moldenhauer (1888) Traité des maladies des fosses nasales des sinus et du pharynx nasal. Trans. from the Gemman 1886 edition by Potiquet. Paris: Asselin et Houzeau.Google Scholar
  46. Moure, E.J. (1893) Manuel pratique des maladies des fosses nasales de la cavité naso-pharyngienne et des sinus de la face, 2d ed. Paris: Octave Doin.Google Scholar
  47. Notta. (1870) Recherches sur la perte de l’odorat. Archives Générales de Médecine, 6th series, 15, 385–407.Google Scholar
  48. Nye, R. (1984) Crime, Madness and Politics in Modem France: The Medical Concept of National Decline. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Ogle, W. (1870) Anosmia, or, cases illustrating the physiology and pathology of the sense of smell. Medico-Chirurgical Trans, 53, 263–290.Google Scholar
  50. Papez, J.W. (1937) A proposed mechanism of emotion. Arch. Neurolo. Psychi., 38, 725–743.Google Scholar
  51. Richards, R. (1987) Darwin and the Emergence of Evolutionary Theories of Mind and Behavior. Chicago: Universrty of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  52. Ries, E. (1903) A new treatment for dysmennorrhea. Am. Gynecol., 3, 375–379.Google Scholar
  53. Riese, W. (1936) Symptomatologie der Erkrankungen des Riechnerven; Symptomatologie der Erkrankungen der Riechrinde [companion articles]. In O. Bumke and O. Foerster (Eds.), Handbuch der Neurologie, vol. 4: Hirnnerven. Berlin: Julius Springer, pp. 1–37.Google Scholar
  54. Serres, E.R.A (1826) Anatomie comparée du cerveau. Paris: Gaben & Co.Google Scholar
  55. Spillane, J.D. (1981) The Doctrine of the Nerves: Chapters in the History of Neurology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Sulloway, F.A. (1979) Freud: Biologist of the Mind. Bungay, Suffolk: Fontana Paperback, 1980.Google Scholar
  57. Watson, W.S. (1875) Diseases of the Nose and Accessory Cavities. London: H.K Lewis.Google Scholar
  58. Zwaardemaker, H. (1899) Les sensations olfactives, leurs combinaisons et leurs compensations. L’Année psychologique, 5, 202–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anne Harrington
  • Vernon Rosario

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations