Classification of Corneal Topography with Videokeratography

  • George O. WaringIII
  • Sadeer B. Hannush
  • Stephen J. Bogan
  • Robert K. Maloney

Abstract

The topography of the cornea has been imaged for over a century. The popularity of refractive corneal surgery in the past decade has emphasized in a practical way the need for accurate and reproducible methods of measuring the power of the entire corneal surface. The comparative usefulness of keratometry, photokeratography, and videokeratography are now matters of active study. We have used videokeratography to study the topography of normal corneas and of those that have undergone radial keratotomy and penetrating keratoplasty. We summarize our findings in this chapter.

Keywords

Torque Sine Refraction Tral Topo 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Waring GO. Making sense of keratospeak II: proposed conventional terminology for corneal topography. Refract. Corneal Surg.1989; 5: 362 - 367.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dabezies OH, Halladay JT. Measurement of corneal curvature: Keratometer (ophthalmometer). In: Dabezies OH, ed. Contact Lenses: The CLAO Guide to Basic Science and Clinical Practice. Orlando, , 1984; pp 17.1–17.27.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stone J. Keratometry. In: Ruben M, ed. Con¬tact Lens Practice: Visual, Therapeutic and Prosthetic. Baltimore, Williams and Wilkins, 1975; pp 104–129.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Burk LL, Waring GO, Radjee B, et al. The effect of selective suture removal on astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmic Surg. 1988; 19:849–854.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Maguire LJ, Singer DE, Klyce SD. Graphic presentation of computer-analyzed keratoscope photographs. Arch Ophthalmol. 1987; 105:223–230.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dingeldein SA, Klyce SD, Wilson SE. Quantitative descriptors of corneal shape derived from computer-assisted analysis of photokeratographs. Refract Corneal Surg. 1989; 5:372–378.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rowsey JJ, Waring GO, Monlux RD, et al. Corneal topography as a refractive change predictor in PERK radial keratotomy. Ophthalmic Surg., in press.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Miller D, Carter J. A proposed new division of corneal functions. In: Cavanagh HD, ed. The Cornea. Transactions of the World Congress on the Cornea III. New York: Raven Press, 1988; pp 155–158.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ruben M. Contact Lens Practice. Baltimore; Williams and Wilkins, 1975; p 97.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rowsey JJ, Schanzlin DJ. Corneal topography. In: Dabezies OH, Cavanagh HD, Farris RD, eds. Contact Lenses: The CLAO Guide to Basic Science and Clinical Practice. 2nd ed. Boston; Little, Brown, 1989; pp 1–16.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hannush SB, Crawford SL, Waring GO, et al. Accuracy and precision of keratometry, photokeratoscopy, and corneal modeling on calibrated steel balls. Arch Ophthalmol. 1989; 107:1235–1239.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hannush SB, Crawford SL, Waring GO, et al. Reproducibility of normal corneal power mea¬surements with a keratometer, photokeratoscope, and video imaging system. Arch Ophthalmol. 1990; 108: 539–544.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Clark BAJ. Mean topography of normal corneas. Aust J Optom. 1974; 57:107–114.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Knoll HA. Corneal contours in the general population as revealed by the photokeratoscope. Am J Optom. 1961; 38:389–397.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Clark BAJ. Topography of some individual corneas. Aust J Optom. 1974; 57:65–69.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mandell RB, St Helen R. Position and curvature of the corneal apex. Am J Optom. 1969; 46:25–29.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Clark BAJ. Variations in corneal topography. Aust J Optom. 1973; 56:399–413.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kiely PM, Smith G, Carney LG. The mean shape of the human cornea. Optom Acta. 1982; 29:1027–1040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dingeldein SA, Klyce SD. The topography of normal corneas. Arch Ophthalmol.1989; 107:512–518.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bogan SJ, Waring GO, Ibrahim O, et al. Classification of normal corneal topography based on computer-assisted videokeratography. Arch Ophthalmol. 1990; 108:945–949.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Bogan SJ, Maloney RK, Drews CD, et al. Computer-assisted videokeratography of corneal topography after radial keratotomy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1990; 108.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rowsey JJ, Waring GO, Monlux R, et al. Prospective evaluation of radial keratotomy (PERK) study. Photokeratoscope corneal topography. Ophthalmology. 1988; 95:322–334.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hanna KD, Jouve FE, Waring GO. Preliminary computer simulation of the effects of radial keratotomy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1989; 107:911–918.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    McDonnell PJ, Garbus J. Corneal topographic changes after radial keratotomy. Ophthalmology. 1989; 96:45–49.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Maguire LJ, Bourne WM. A multifocal lens effect as a complication of radial keratotomy. Refract Corneal Surg. 1989; 5:394–399.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Santos VR, Waring GO, Lynn MJ, et al. Relationship between refractive error and visual acuity in the prospective evaluation of radial keratotomy (PERK) study. Arch Ophthalmol. 1987; 105:86–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Applegate A. Gansel KA. The importance of pupil size in optical quality measurements following radial keratotomy. Refract Corneal Surg. 1990; 6:47–54.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tripoli NK, Ibrahim OS, Coggins JM, et al. Quantitative and qualitative topography classification of clear penetrating keratoplasties. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1990; 30 (suppl): 480.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • George O. WaringIII
  • Sadeer B. Hannush
  • Stephen J. Bogan
  • Robert K. Maloney

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations