The Resultant via a Koszul Complex

• Marc Chardin
Conference paper
Part of the Progress in Mathematics book series (PM, volume 109)

Abstract

As noticed by Jouanolou, Hurwitz proved in 1913 ([Hu]) that, in the generic case, the Koszul complex is acyclic in positive degrees if the number of (homogeneous) polynomials is less than or equal to the number of variables. It was known around 1930 that resultants may be calculated as a Mc Rae invariant of this complex. This expresses the resultant as an alternate product of determinants coming from the differentials of this complex. Demazure explained in a preprint ([De]), how to recover this formula from an easy particular case of deep results of Buchsbaum and Eisenbud on finite free resolutions. He noticed that one only needs to add one new variable in order to do the calculation in a non generic situation.

I have never seen any mention of this technique of calculation in recent reports on the subject (except the quite confidential one of Demazure and in an extensive work of Jouanolou, however from a rather different point of view). So, I will give here elementary and short proofs of the theorems needed—except the well-known acyclicity of the Koszul complex and the “Principal Theorem of Elimination”—and present some useful remarks leading to the subsequent algorithm. In fact, no genericity is needed (it is not the case for all the other techniques). Furthermore, when the resultant vanishes, some information can be given about the dimension of the associated variety.

As an illustration of this technique, we give an arithmetical consequence on the resultant: if the polynomials have integral coefficients and their reductions modulo a prime p defines a variety of projective dimension zero and degree d, then p d divides the resultant.

References

1. [Bo]
N. Bourbaki, Algèbre Commutative Chapitres 1 à 9, Masson 1983 et 1985.Google Scholar
2. [De]
M. Demazure, Une définition constructive du résultant, Notes Informelles de Calcul Formel 2, prépublications du Centre de Mathématiques de l’École Polytechnique, 1984.Google Scholar
3. [Gr]
W. Gröbner, Modem Algebraische Geometrie, Springer-Verlag Wien und Innsbruck, 1949.
4. [Hu]
A. Hurwitz, Über die Trägheitsformen eines algebraischen Moduls, Annali di Mathematica pura ed applicata (3) 20, 1913, pp. 113–151.
5. [Jo1]
J.-P. Jouanolou, Le formalisme du résultant, Publication de l’IRMA 417/P-234, Université de Strasbourg, 1990.Google Scholar
6. [Jo2]
J.-P. Jouanolou, Aspects invariants de l’élimination, Publication de l’IRMA 457/P-263, Université de Strasbourg, 1991.Google Scholar
7. [Ma]
F. S. Macaulay, The Algebraic Theory of Modular Systems, Stechert-Hafner Service Agency, New-York and London, 1964, (Originally published in 1916 by Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
8. [No]
D.G. Northcott, Lessons on Rings Modules and Multiplicities, Cambridge University Press, 1968.Google Scholar
9. [Se]
J.-P. Serre, Algèbre locale et multiplicités, Lectures Notes in Mathematics 11, 1965.Google Scholar