Beyond Objectivism and Relativism in Dream Interpretation
First, I discuss the epistemological status of dreams and dream interpretations. The latter may be seen as descriptions of the dreamer’s conflicts and scenarios, or as enrichments of the dreamer’s scenarios. Then, by way of example, I compare fragments of four interpretations of one dream. I conclude that dream experts are generally able to avoid the pitfalls of theoretical bias and subjectivity, though they do not agree in every detail. In order for a truthful interpretation to be a fruitful starting point for self scrutiny by the dreamer, it should neither be objective, nor subjective.
KeywordsEpistemological Status Current Conflict Theoretical Bias Dream Work Dream Interpretation
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Berakhot, In Rabbi Dr. I. Epstein, (Ed.), The Babylonian Talmud, (1935–38), (trans. Maurice Simon). London: Soncino Press.Google Scholar
- Bosnak, R. (1986) A little course on dreams. Boston: Shambhala.Google Scholar
- Fosshage, J.L. (1983). The psychological function of dreams: A revised psychoanalytic perspective. Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought, 6, 641–669.Google Scholar
- Stockholder, K. (1987). Dream works: Lovers and families in Shakespeare’s plays. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
- Terwee, S. J. S. (1990). Hermeneutics in psychology and psychoanalysis. New York: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
- Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Wittgenstein, L. (1977). Vermischte Bemerkungen/ Culture And Value. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar