Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Statistics ((LNS,volume 80))

Abstract

Mallows’ ϕ model is a one-parameter exponential family model for vectors of ranks. Fligner and Verducci have extended this model to multistage ranking situations. In this paper we introduce a class of models based on so-called orthogonal contrasts of the objects to be ranked, which we use to analyze three sets of data. The first set, from the GRE, consists of 98 students’ ranking of five words according to their association with the word idea. The second is the American Psychological Association’s 1980 presidential election data. The final set illustrates an approach to rank-based analysis-of-variance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Babington Smith, B. Discussion of Professor Ross’s paper. J. Royal Statist. Soc. B, 12:53–56, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barton, D. E., David, F. N. and Mallows, C. L. “Non-randomness in a sequence of two alternatives: I. Wilcoxon and allied test statistics,” Biomeirika 45:166–177, 1958.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Böckenholt, U. “Thurstonian models for ranking data,” Proceedings of the Joint Summer Research Conference on Probability Models and Statistical Analysis for Ranking Data, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chapman, L., Girard, A., Gravelle, M., Lewis, P. and Ricker, A. “Cognitive processes in expert and novice LCS searchers,” Class project, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chung, L. and Marden, J. I. “Use of nonnull models for rank statistics in bivariate, two-sample, and analysis-of-variance problems,” To appear in J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cohen, A. “Analysis of large sets of ranking data,” Communications in StatisticsTheory and Methods 11:235–256, 1982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cohen, A. “Data analysis of ranking data,” Proceedings of the Joint Summer Research Conference on Probability Models and Statistical Analysis for Ranking Data, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cohen, A. and Mallows, C. L. “Analysis of ranking data,” Bell Laboratories Memorandum, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cohen, A. and Mallows, C. L. “Assessing goodness of fit of ranking models to data,” The Statistician, 32:361–373 1983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Critchlow, D. Metric Methods for Analyzing Partially Ranked Data, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1985.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Critchlow, D., Fligner, M. and Verducci, J. “Probability models on rankings,” Proceedings of the Joint Summer Research Conference on Probability Models and Statistical Analysis for Ranking Data, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Croon, M. A. “Latent class models for the analysis of rankings,” in New Developments in Psychological Choice Modeling. Feger, Klauer and de Soete, editors, North-Holland, pp. 99–121, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Croon, M. A. “Latent class models,” Proceedings of the Joint Summer Research Conference on Probability Models and Statistical Analysis for Ranking Data, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Diaconis, P. Group Representations in Probability and Statistics 11, Institute of Mathematical Statistics Lecture Notes-Monograph, Series 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Diaconis, P. “A generalization of spectral analysis with application to ranked data,” Annals of Statistics, 17:949–979, 1989.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Feigin, P. and Cohen, A. “On a model of concordance between judges,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Association B, 40:203–213, 1978.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Fienberg, S. “Randomization and social affairs: The 1970 draft lottery,” Science 171:255–261, 1971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fligner, M. A., and Verducci, J. S. “Distance based ranking models,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Association B, 48:359–369, 1986.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Fligner, M. A., and Verducci, J. S. “Multistage Ranking Models,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83:892–901, 1988.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Goldberg, A. I. The relevance of cosmopolitan/local orientations to professional values and behavior. Sociology of Work and Occupation 3:331–356, 1976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hare, T. The Election of Representatives, Parliamentary and Municipal: A Treatise, 3rd Edition, Logman, Roberts and Green, London, 1865.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mallows, C. L. “Non-null Ranking Models: I,” Biometrika, 44:114–130, 1957.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Mann, H. B. “Non-parametric tests against trends,” Econometrica, 13:245–259, 1945.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Marden, J. I. “Use of orthogonal contrasts in analyzing rank data,” Technical Report, Department of Statistics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  25. McCullagh, P. “Permutations and regression models,” Proceedings of the Joint Summer Research Conference on Probability Models and Statistical Analysis for Ranking Data, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Schulman, R. R. “Ordinal Data: An alternative distribution,” Psychometrika, 44:3–20, 1979.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Silverberg, A. R. “Statistical models for q-permutations,” Proceedings of the Biopharmaceutical Section, American Statistical Association, 107–112, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Smith, L. “A censored ranking problem,” Proceedings of the Joint Summer Research Conference on Probability Models and Statistical Analysis for Ranking Data, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Stern, H. “Probability models on rankings and the electoral process, Proceedings of the Joint Summer Research Conference on Probability Models and Statistical Analysis for Ranking Data, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Thompson, G. L. “A note on the rank transform for interaction,” Biometrika, in press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  31. van Blokland-Vogelesang, R. A. W. “Unfolding and consensus ranking: A prestige ladder for technical occupations,” in New Developments in Psychological Choice Modeling. Feger, Klauer and de Soete, editors, North-Holland, pp. 237–258, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Chung, L., Marden, J.I. (1993). Extensions of Mallows’ ϕ Model. In: Fligner, M.A., Verducci, J.S. (eds) Probability Models and Statistical Analyses for Ranking Data. Lecture Notes in Statistics, vol 80. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2738-0_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2738-0_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-97920-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-2738-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics