Skip to main content

Refraction of Light

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Light and Color in the Outdoors

Abstract

The pole used by the boatman to push his boat along looks as if it were broken just where it enters the water; this impression is caused by the fact that rays of light bend when they go from the air into water, or vice versa. Notice, however, that this ‘broken stick’ by no means represents the image of the broken ray of light, for the latter is bent in just the opposite direction. The connection between the two is seen in Fig. 36.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. F.A. Forel, Le Léman, Lausanne, 1895, II, 454 and 456. L. Boltzman, Populäre Schriften, p. 59.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kerner von Maurilaun, Pflanzerleben.

    Google Scholar 

  3. With information from K. Braak.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Z. Phys. Chem. Unterricht, 4, 86, 1891; 37, 90, 1924. E. Barthel, Arch Syst Philos, 19, 355, 1913.

    Google Scholar 

  5. H.M. Reese, J. Opt. Soc. Am., 21, 282, 1931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Based on information from Prof. D. Tinbergen.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Based on information from Prof. H.C. Burge

    Google Scholar 

  8. Forel, C.R. Acad. Sci., 153, 1054, 1911; Proc. R. Soc. Edinburgh, 32, 175, 1912. Onweders en Optische Verschijnselen in Nederland, 42, 37, 1921.; 47, 52, 1926. Drachten, Hemelen Dampkring, 13,70,1915.

    Google Scholar 

  9. W. Hiller, Phys. Z., 14, 718, 1913; 15, 303, 1914. Ball, Philos. Mag.,35, 404, 1868. Ann. Phys. (Pogg.), 134, 336, 1868.

    Google Scholar 

  10. H. Futi, Geophys. Mag., 4, 387, 1931. L.A. Ramdas and S.L. Malurkar, Nature, 129, 6, 1932. W.E. Schiele, Veröff. Geophys. Inst Leipzig, 7, 144, 1935. K. Braak, Tÿdschr.Kon.Ned.Aardr. Genootschap, 39, 587, 1922. L.G. Vedy, Meteorol. Mag., 63, 249, 1928; Hemel en Dampkring, 15, 71, 1917.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Onweders en Optische Verschgnselen in Nederland, 14, 63, 1893.

    Google Scholar 

  12. F.A. Forel, Proc. R. Soc. Edinburgh, 32, 175, 1912. Arch Sci Phys Nat., 3, 545, 1897. C. R. Acad. Sci., 153, 1054, 1911. Onweders en Optische Verschijnselen in Nederland, 40, 46, 1919; 54, 40, 1933. {J. Pinkhof}, Hemel en Dampkring, 31, 252, 1933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. A.L. Colton, Contrib. Lick. Obs., 1, 1895. A. Ricco, Mem. Spettr. Ital., 30, 96, 1901. Prinz, ibid., 31, 36, 1902. Arctowski, ibid., 31, 190, 1902. Wegener, Beitr. Phys.Atmos., 4,26,1912. A Bracke, Déformations du Soleil, Mons, 1907; Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacif., 45, 270, 1933. Havinga, Hemel en Dampkring, 19, 161, 1922.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Reimann, MeteoroL. Z., 4, 144,1887; Onweders en Optische Verschijselen in Nederland, 21, 51, 1900. J. Cassini, Mem. Acad. Paris, 10, 234, 1693. Edinburgh Philos. J., 10, 362, 1824.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fisher, Pop. Astron., 29, 1921. Mulder, The Green Ray or Green Flash, The Hague, 1922. Feenstra Ruiper, ‘De Groene Straal’, dissertation, Utrecht, 1926. Ann. Hydr., 63, 336, 1935; 65, 489, 1937. Mem. Spettr. Ital., 31, 36, 1902. Nature, 156, 146, 1945. Hemel en Dampkring, 33, 219, 1935. Onweders en Optische Verschijnselen in Nederland, 48, 81, 1927. Hemel en Dampkring, 19, 83, 1921. N. Dijkwel, Hemel en Dampkring, 34, 261, 1936. Nature, 111, 13, 1923. Meteorol. Z., 49, 271, 1932. S.W. Visser and J.T. Verstelle, Hemel en Dampkring, 32, 81, 1934. Proc. R. Soc., 126, 311, 1930. P. Moureau, La Nature, 294, 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  16. S.W. Visser, Hemel en Dampkring, 19, 83, 1921.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nature, 94, 61, 1914. O. J. Theor. Appl. Meteorol, 62, 128, 1936. Ann. Soc. Meteorol France, 47, 1899. W.M. Lindley, J. Brit. Astron. Assoc., 47, 298, 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hemel en Dampkring, 20, 130, 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Handb. Geophys, VIII. Philos. Mag., 13, 301, 1857.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Dufour, Philos. Mag., 19, 216, 1860. Arch. Sci. Phys. Nat., 29, 545, 1893. Bigourdan, C.R. Acad. Sci., 160, 579, 1915. J.N. Dörr, Meteorol Z, 32, 153, 1915.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. C. Rozet, C. R. Acad. Sci., 142, 913, 1906; 146, 325, 1906. Nature, 37, 224, 1888. S.A. Mitchell, Handb. Astrophys., IV, 353, 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  22. H. Bock, Z. Phys. Chem. Unterricht, 53, 139, 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Niederhoff, Z. Sinnesphysiol., 65, 27 and 232, 1934; 66, 213, 1936.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Minnaert, M. (1993). Refraction of Light. In: Light and Color in the Outdoors. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2722-9_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2722-9_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-94413-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-2722-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics