Skip to main content

Development of a Computerized Laboratory Alerting System

  • Chapter
Decision Support Systems in Critical Care

Part of the book series: Computers and Medicine ((C+M))

Abstract

The role of the clinical laboratory is primarily to provide physicians with patient data for use in clinical decision-making. Studies have shown that laboratory test results are the data most frequently used by physicians in decision-making [1,2]. For such decision-making to be effective, the clinical laboratory must provide accurate laboratory test results in a timely fashion, and physicians must identify and utilize important test results in making appropriate patient care decisions. Factors which make it difficult to achieve these goals are 1) problems in data communication, 2) unavailability of the attending physician, 3) information overload, and 4) human imperfectibility 3].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. McDonald CJ, Wheeler LA, Glazener T, and Blevins L. A data base approach to laboratory computerization. Am J Clin pathol 1985; 83:707.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bradshaw KE, Gardner RM, Clemmer TP, Orme JF, Thomas F, and West BJ. Physician decision-making-Evaluation of data used in a computerized ICU. Int J Clin Monit Comput 1984; 1:81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. McDonald CJ, Wilson GA, and McCabe GP. Physician response to computer reminders. JAMA 1980; 244:1579.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Miller RE, Steinbach Gl, and Dayhoff RE. A hierarchical computer network: An alternative approach to clinical laboratory computerization in a large hospital. Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care. Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society Press, 1980; p. 105.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Schneiderman MD, DeSalvo L, Baylor S, and Wolf PL. The “abnormal” screening laboratory results. Arch Int Med 1972; 129:88.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. McDonald CJ. Protocol-based computer reminders, the quality of care and the nonperfectability of man. N Engl J Med 1976; 195:1351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Drinkwater BL. Performance of civil aviation pilots under conditions of sensory input overload. Aerosp Med 1967; 38:164.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Alluist EA. Attention and vigilance as mechanisms of response. In EA Bilodeau (ed): Acquisition of Skill. New York: Academic Press, 1966; p 201.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wheeler LA, Brecher G, and Sheiner LB. Clinical laboratory use in the evaluation of anemia. JAMA 1977; 238:2709.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Olsen DM, Kane RL, and Proctor PH. A controlled trial of multiphasic screening. N Engl J Med 1976; 294:925.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Byrd RB, Horn BR, Solomon DA, Griggs GA, and Wilder NJ. Treatment of tuberculosis by the pulmonary physician. Ann Inter Med 1977; 86:799.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Dixon RH, Laszio J. Utilization of clinical chemistry services by medical staff: An analysis. Arch Intern Med 1974; 134:1064.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Shapiro S, Slone D, Lewis GP, Jick H. Fatal drug reactions among medical inpatients. JAMA 1971;216:467.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Friedman RH. The use of computers to assist physicians in patient management. Adv Intern Med 1986; 31:71.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Teach RL, Shortliffe EH. An analysis of physician attitudes regarding computer-based clinical consultation systems. Comput Biomed Res 1981; 14:542.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Siegel C, Alexander MJ. Acceptance and impact of the computer in clinical decisions. Hosp Community Psychiatr 1984; 35:773.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Enlander D (ed). Computers in Laboratory Medicine. New York: Academic Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Speicher CE, Smith JW, Jr. Interpretive reporting in clinical pathology. JAMA 1980; 243:1556.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Evans RS, Gardner RM, Bush AR, Burke JP, Jacobsen JA, Larsen RA, Meier FA, Warner HR. Development of a computerized infections disease monitor (CIDM). Comput Biomed Res 1985; 18:103.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Myers JD. The computer as a diagnostic consultant with emphasis on the use of laboratory data. Clin Chem 1986; 32:1714.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Spackman KA, Connelly DP. Knowledge-based systems in laboratory medicine and pathology. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1987; 111:116.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Lindberg D. The Growth of Medical Information Systems in the United States. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Shortliffe EH. Computer programs to support clinical decision making. JAMA 1987; 258:61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Pryor TA, Gardner RM, Clayton PD, Warner HR. The HELP system/Med Systems 1983; 7:87.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Pryor TA. The HELP medical record system. MD comput 1988; 5:22.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Johnson DS, Burkes M, Sittig D, Hinson D, Pryor TA. Evaluation of the Effects of Computerized Nurse Charting. Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care. Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society Press, 1987; p 363.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Bradshaw KE. Computerized alerting system warns of life-threatening events. Proceedings of the 10th Annual Symposium of Computer Applications in Medical Care. Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society Press, 1986; p 403.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bradshaw, K.E., Gardner, R.M., Pryor, T.A. (1994). Development of a Computerized Laboratory Alerting System. In: Shabot, M.M., Gardner, R.M. (eds) Decision Support Systems in Critical Care. Computers and Medicine. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2698-7_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2698-7_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-97799-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-2698-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics