Advertisement

Decision Analysis: A Framework for Critical Care Decision Assistance

  • Adam Seiver
  • Samuel Holtzman
Part of the Computers and Medicine book series (C+M)

Abstract

Over the next five years, computer-based systems will replace the paper chart in many critical care units [1]. Powerful, easy-to-use bedside workstations will acquire, store, and display a comprehensive set of patient data, including the patient’s history and physical exam, physiological variables, laboratory results, and radiographic images. Using such a system, the clinician will have vastly better access to facts about his or her patients than he now has, using the existing manual charting methods. However, having ready access to facts leaves the clinician with the difficult task of choosing what to do. It is natural to expect that the computer should provide assistance here, as well. Reed Gardner [2], President of Computers in Critical Care and Pulmonary Medicine has said: “The ultimate goal of a medical computer system is, after all, to assist physicians in making medical decisions.”

Keywords

Critical Care Decision Analysis Influence Diagram Chance Node Standing Order 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Brimm JE. Computers in critical care. Crit Care Nurs Q 1987, March 53–63.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gardner RM. Computerized management of intensive care patients. MD Comput 1986; 3:36–51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bone RC. Monitoring respiratory function in the patient with adult respiratory distress syndrome. Semin Resp Med 1981; 3:45–55.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shoemaker WC. Relation of oxygen transport patterns to the pathophysiology and therapy of shock states. Intensive Care Med 1987; 13:230–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP. An evaluation of outcome from intensive care in major medical centers. An Intern Med 1986; 104:410–18.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Civetta JM, Hudson-Civetta J. Cost-effective use of the intensive care unit. In Eiseman B, Stahlgren L. (ed): Cost-Effective Surgical Care 1987.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Howard RA. Decision analysis: applied decision theory. In: Hertz DB, Melese J (eds): Proceeding of the Fourth International Conference on Operations Research. New York: Wiley-Interscience, 1986; 55–71.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Laplace PS. A Philosophical essay on probabilities. 6th ed. New York: Dover, 1951.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bernoulli D. Specimen theoriae novea de mensora sortis. Papers of the Imperial Academy of Sciences in Petersburg 1738; 5:175–92.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pauker SG, Kassirer JP. Decision analysis. New Engl J Med 1987; 316:250–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Howard RA, Matheson JE. Influence diagrams. In: Howard RA, Matheson JE (eds): Readings on the Principles and Applications of Decision Analysis, Vol. II Menlo Park, CA: Strategic Decisions Group, 1984:719–62.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Olmsted S.On representing and solving decision problems. PH.D. dissertation. Stanford, Calif.: Engineering-Economic Systems Department, Stanford University, 1983.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shachter RD. Evaluating influence diagrams. Operations Res 1986; 34:871–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Holtzman S. Intelligent decision systems. Reading, MA. Addison-Wesley, 1989; pp. 90–107.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Howard RA. Knowledge maps. Management Science 1989; 35(8):903–922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Comroe JH, Forster RE, DuBois AB, Briscoe WA, Carlsen E. The Lung. 2nd edition. Chicago: Year Bood Medical Publishers, 1962:339–41.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adam Seiver
  • Samuel Holtzman

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations