The Future of Computerized Decision Support in Critical Care

  • Reed M. Gardner
  • M. Michael Shabot
Part of the Computers and Medicine book series (C+M)

Abstract

As we write this final chapter, there is a foot of new snow on the ground in R.G.’s backyard in Salt Lake City, and the snow continues to fall. Last night three local television weather forecasters predicted we would only have two inches of snow, and all they had to do was predict one day into the future! With some trepidation, and without the equivalent of weather satellites and 40 years experience with forecasting, the authors will try to predict the future of computers and decision support systems in critical care. Our projections are based on two decades of experience and a generally optimistic outlook. We believe that seven broad areas will determine the pace of the future of computerized decision support in critical care:
  1. 1.

    Human, cultural, and sociological issues relating to how computers will be used in the intensive care unit (ICU).

     
  2. 2.

    Standardization in medicine and the ability to share medical knowledge will be essential.

     
  3. 3.

    Expanded medical knowledge will lead to better patient care.

     
  4. 4.

    Hardware and software will continue to advance at a rapid rate.

     
  5. 5.

    Data acquisition methods and instrumentation will provide more accurate, timely, and less expensive measurements.

     
  6. 6.

    Sharing of computer and clinical knowledge in computer form will become common and encouraged by government and the clinical community.

     
  7. 7.

    Better methods for prognostic decision-making will enable medical practitioners and society to make better ethical decisions about health care.

     

Keywords

Catheter Aspirin Monit Plague 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Greenbaum J, Kyng M. Design at Work: Cooperative Design of Computer Systems. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1991.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wield PJ. Design Jet plotter user interface design: Learning the hard way about human interactions. Hewlett-Packard Journal 1992; 43(6): 12.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shortliffe EH, Barnett GO. Medical data: Their acquisition, storage, and use. In: Medical Informatics: Computer Applications in Health Care. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1990; pp 37–69.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Humphreys BL, Lindberg DAB. Building a unified medical language system. SCAMC 1989; 13:475–480.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Humphreys BL, Lindberg DAB. The UMLS knowledge sources: Tools for building better user interfaces. SCAMC 1990; 14:121–125.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Huff SM, Warner HR. A comparison of Meta-1 and HELP terms: Implications for clinical data. SCAMC 1990; 14:166–169.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Humphreys BL, Lindberg DAB, Hole WT. Assessing and enhancing the value of the UMLS knowledge sources. SCAMC 1991; 15:78–82.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Masys DR. An evaluation of the source selection elements of the prototype UMLS information source map. SCAMC 1992; 16:295–298.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chute CG, Yang Y. An evaluation of concept based latent semantic indexing for clinical information retrieval. SCAMC 1992; 16:639–643.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Clayton PD, Pryor TA, Wigertz OB, Hripcsak G. Issues and structures for sharing medical knowledge among decision-making systems: The 1989 Arden Homestead Retreat. SCAMC 1989; 13:116–121.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Clayton PD, Hripcsak, Pryor TA. Emerging standards for medical logic. SCAMC 1990; 14:27–31.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hripcsak G, Clayton PD, Pryor TA, Haug P, Wigertz OB, Van der lei J. The Arden syntax for medical logic modules. SCAMC 1990; 14:200–204.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shwe M, Sujansky W, Middleton B. Reuse of knowledge represented in the Arden Syntax. SCAMC 1992; 16:47–51.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Johansson BG, Wigertz OB. An object oriented approach to interpret medical knowledge based on Arden Syntax. SCAMC 1992; 16:52–56.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bell TE. Annual Review—Technology 1993. IEEE Spectrum 1993; 30(1):24–25.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Comerford R. Technology 1993—PCs and workstations. IEEE Spectrum 1993; 30(l):26–29.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Comerford R. Technology 1993—Software. IEEE Spectrum 1993; 30(1):30–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sarch R. Technology 1993—Data communications. IEEE Spectrum 1993; 30(l):42–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Stephenson J. Technology 1993—Medical electronics. IEEE Spectrum 1993; 30(l):76–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Eddy DM. Clinical decision making. JAMA 1990: 263:1265–1275.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Eddy DM. Practice policies—guidelines for methods. JAMA 1990; 263:1839–1841.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Eddy DM. Guidelines for policy statements: The explicit approach. JAMA 1990; 263:2239–2243.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Eddy DM. Designing a practice policy—Standards, guidelines, and options. JAMA 1990; 263:3077–3084.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gallagher TJ. Guidelines for care: The time has come. Crit Care Med 1991; 19:138.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Scholtes PR. The Team Handbook: How To Use Teams To Improve Quality. Madison, WI: Joiner Associates, 1992.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    East TD, Morris AH, Wallace CJ, Clemmer TP, Orme JF Jr, Weaver LK, Henderson S, Sittig DF. A strategy for development of computerized critical care decision support systems. Intl J Clin Monit Comput 1992; 8:263–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Guyatt G, et al. Guidelines for the clinical and economic evaluation of Health Care Technologies. Soc Sei Med 1986; 22:393–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Brook RH. Practice guidelines and practicing medicine—Are they compatible? JAMA 1989; 262:3027–3030.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Civetta JM. Critical care: How should we evaluate our progress? Crit Care Med 1992;20:1714–1720.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Loch S, Terry D. Information filtering. Communications of the ACM 1992; 35(12):27–28.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Belkin NJ, Croft WB. Information filtering and information retrieval: Two sides of the same coin? Communications of the ACM 1992; 35(12):29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Loeb S. Architecting personalized delivery of multimedia information. Communications of the ACM 1992; 35(12):39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Foltz PW, Dumais ST. Personalized information delivery: An analysis of information filtering methods. Communications of the ACM 1992; 35(12):51–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Goldberg D, Nichols D, Oki BM, Terry D. Using collaborative filtering to weave an information tapestry. Communications of the ACM 1992; 35(12);61–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Reed M. Gardner
  • M. Michael Shabot

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations