• M. G. Neuffer
Part of the Springer Lab Manuals book series (SLM)


THE production of heritable changes in the maize genome is an important part of maize genetic research. Chromosome breaks, deficiencies, duplications, translocations, inversions, gene mutations, and transposon insertions all have their place. There are unique and efficient ways to produce each, as described in Stadler and Roman (1948), Sax (1957), Nuffer (1957), Sparrow (1961), and McClintock (1951). Special attention should be given Stadler’s (1946) descriptions of methods of studying mutation; the implications of seed vs. pollen treatment in relation to the ontogeny of the germ cells are discussed by several authors (Coe and Neuffer 1978; Johri and Coe 1983; Coe et al. 1988). Reviews of mutagenic agents, techniques, applications, and consequences are presented in Bird and Neuffer (1985) and Neuffer and Chang (1989).


Seed Treatment Pollen Treatment Recessive Mutant Maize Genome Ethyl Methane Sulfonate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bird RM, Neuffer MG (1985) Odd new dominant mutations affecting the development of the maize leaf. In Freeling M (ed) Plant Genetics, Alan R Liss, New York, pp 818–822Google Scholar
  2. Coe EH, Jr, Neuffer MG (1978) Embryo cells and their destinies in the corn plant. In Subtelny S, Sussex IM (eds) The Clonal Basis of Development, Academic Press, New York, pp 113–129Google Scholar
  3. Coe EH Jr, Neuffer MG, Hoisington DA (1988) The genetics of corn. In Sprague GF (ed) Corn and Corn Improvement, Third Edition, Am Soc Agronomy, Madison, WI, pp 81–258Google Scholar
  4. Johri MM, Coe EH, Jr (1983) Clonal analysis of corn plant development. I. The development of the tassel and the ear shoot. Dev Biol 97: 154–172PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. McClintock B (1951) Chromosome organization and genic expression. Cold Spring Harbor Symp Quant Biol 16: 13–47PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Neuffer MG (1982) Mutant induction in maize. In Sheridan WF (ed) Maize for Biological Research, Plant Mol Biol Assoc, Charlottesville, VA, pp 61–64Google Scholar
  7. Neuffer MG, Chang MT (1989) Induced mutations in biological and agronomic research. Science for Plant Breeding. Proc. of the XII Congress of EUCARPIA, Gottingen, Germany 16: 165–178Google Scholar
  8. Nuffer MG (1957) Additional evidence on the effect of X-ray and ultraviolet radiation on mutation in maize. Genetics 42: 273–282PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Rédei GP (1974) Economy in mutation experiments. Z. Pflanzenzüchtg. 73: 87–96Google Scholar
  10. Rédei GP, Acedo GN, Sandhu SS (1984) Mutation induction and detection in Arabidopsis. In Chu Ehy, Generoso WM (eds) Mutation, Cancer and Malformation, Plenum Pub. Corp., pp 285–313Google Scholar
  11. Sax K (1957) The effect of ionizing radiation on chromosomes. Quart Rev Biol 32: 15–26PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Sparrow AH (1961) Types of ionizing radiation and their cytogenetic effects. Symp on Mutation and Plant Breeding No. 891: 55–112. Natl Res Council, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  13. Stadler LJ (1946) Spontaneous mutation at the R locus in maize. I. The aleurone-color and plant-color effects. Genetics 31: 377–394Google Scholar
  14. Stadler LJ, Roman H (1948) The effect of X-rays upon mutation of the gene A in maize. Genetics 33: 273–303PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. G. Neuffer

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations