Abstract
The goal of this paper is to examine the use of TETRAD to generate attitude formation models from data. We review the controversy regarding models of attitude formation in the psychology literature, and we re-analyze the data using different subroutines from TETRAD to shed further light on this controversy.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bagozzi, R. P. and Y. Yi (1991), “Multitrait-Multimethod Matrices in Consumer Research,” J. Cons. Res., 17(4), 426–439.
Bentler, P. and C. Chou (1990), “Model Search in TETRAD II and EQS,” Soc. Methods and Res., 19(1), 67–79.
Birnbaum, M. (1981), “Thinking and Feeling: A Skeptical Review,” Amer. Psych., 36, 99–101.
Birnbaum, M. and B. Meilers (1979), “One Mediator Model of Exposure Effects is Still Viable,” J. Pers. and Soc. Psych., 37(6), 1090–1096.
Boomsma, A. (1985), “Nonconvergence, Improper Solutions, and Starting Values in LISREL Maximum Likelihood Estimation,” Psychometrika, 50(2), 229–242.
Glymour, C., R. Schemes, P. Spirtes and K. Kelly (1987), Discovering Causal Structure, Academic Press, New York, NY.
Joreskog, K and D. Sorbom (1990), “Model Search with TETRAD II and LISREL,” Soc. Methods and Res., 19(1), 93–106.
Lazarus, R. S. (1982), “Thoughts on the Relation Between Emotion and Cognition,” Amer. Psych., 37(9), 1019–1024.
Lazarus, R. S. (1984), “On the Primacy of Cognition,” Amer. Psych., 39(2), 124–129.
Mellers, B. (1981), “Feeling More Than Thinking,” Amer. Psych., 36, 802–803.
Mishra, S. and P. Shenoy (1993), “Inducing Attitude Formation Models Using TETRAD,” School of Business Working Paper No. 247, University of Kansas.
Moreland, R. L. and R. Zajonc (1977), “Is Stimulus Recognition a Necessary Condition for Exposure Effects?” J. Pers. and Soc. Psych., 35(4), 191–199.
Moreland, R. and R. Zajonc (1979), “Exposure Effects May Not Depend on Stimulus Recognition,” J. Pers. and Soc. Psych., 37(6), 1085–1089.
Scheines, R. (1993), “Inferring Causal Structure Among Unmeasured Variables,” Prelim. Papers of the 4th Intern. Workshop on A.I. and Stat., 151–162, Fort Lauderdale, FL.
Spirtes, P., R. Schemes and C. Glymour (1990), “Simulation Studies of the Reliability of Computer-Aided Model Specification using the Tetrad II, EQS, and LISREL Programs,” Soc. Methods and Res., 19, 3–66.
Spirtes, P., R. Scheines, C. Glymour, and C. Meek (1992), TETRAD II: Tools for Discovery, Version 2. 1 User’s Manual, Department of Philosophy, Carnegie Mellon Univ., Pittsburg, PA.
Wilson, W. (1979), “Feeling More Than We Can Know: Exposure Effects Without Learning,” J. Pers. and Soc. Psych., 37(6), 811–821.
Zajonc, R. (1980), “Feeling and Thinking: Preferences Need No Inferences,” Amer. Psych., 35,151–175.
Zajonc, R. (1981), “A One-Factor Mind About Mind and Emotion,” Amer. Psych., 36, 102–103.
Zajonc, R. and H. Markus (1982), “Affective and Cognitive Factors in Preferences,” J. Cons. Res., 9(2), 123–131.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1994 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Mishra, S., Shenoy, P.P. (1994). Attitude Formation Models: Insights from TETRAD. In: Cheeseman, P., Oldford, R.W. (eds) Selecting Models from Data. Lecture Notes in Statistics, vol 89. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2660-4_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2660-4_23
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-94281-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-2660-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive