Skip to main content

Attitude Formation Models: Insights from TETRAD

  • Conference paper
Book cover Selecting Models from Data

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Statistics ((LNS,volume 89))

Abstract

The goal of this paper is to examine the use of TETRAD to generate attitude formation models from data. We review the controversy regarding models of attitude formation in the psychology literature, and we re-analyze the data using different subroutines from TETRAD to shed further light on this controversy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bagozzi, R. P. and Y. Yi (1991), “Multitrait-Multimethod Matrices in Consumer Research,” J. Cons. Res., 17(4), 426–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bentler, P. and C. Chou (1990), “Model Search in TETRAD II and EQS,” Soc. Methods and Res., 19(1), 67–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Birnbaum, M. (1981), “Thinking and Feeling: A Skeptical Review,” Amer. Psych., 36, 99–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Birnbaum, M. and B. Meilers (1979), “One Mediator Model of Exposure Effects is Still Viable,” J. Pers. and Soc. Psych., 37(6), 1090–1096.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Boomsma, A. (1985), “Nonconvergence, Improper Solutions, and Starting Values in LISREL Maximum Likelihood Estimation,” Psychometrika, 50(2), 229–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Glymour, C., R. Schemes, P. Spirtes and K. Kelly (1987), Discovering Causal Structure, Academic Press, New York, NY.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Joreskog, K and D. Sorbom (1990), “Model Search with TETRAD II and LISREL,” Soc. Methods and Res., 19(1), 93–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lazarus, R. S. (1982), “Thoughts on the Relation Between Emotion and Cognition,” Amer. Psych., 37(9), 1019–1024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lazarus, R. S. (1984), “On the Primacy of Cognition,” Amer. Psych., 39(2), 124–129.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Mellers, B. (1981), “Feeling More Than Thinking,” Amer. Psych., 36, 802–803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mishra, S. and P. Shenoy (1993), “Inducing Attitude Formation Models Using TETRAD,” School of Business Working Paper No. 247, University of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Moreland, R. L. and R. Zajonc (1977), “Is Stimulus Recognition a Necessary Condition for Exposure Effects?” J. Pers. and Soc. Psych., 35(4), 191–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Moreland, R. and R. Zajonc (1979), “Exposure Effects May Not Depend on Stimulus Recognition,” J. Pers. and Soc. Psych., 37(6), 1085–1089.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Scheines, R. (1993), “Inferring Causal Structure Among Unmeasured Variables,” Prelim. Papers of the 4th Intern. Workshop on A.I. and Stat., 151–162, Fort Lauderdale, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Spirtes, P., R. Schemes and C. Glymour (1990), “Simulation Studies of the Reliability of Computer-Aided Model Specification using the Tetrad II, EQS, and LISREL Programs,” Soc. Methods and Res., 19, 3–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Spirtes, P., R. Scheines, C. Glymour, and C. Meek (1992), TETRAD II: Tools for Discovery, Version 2. 1 User’s Manual, Department of Philosophy, Carnegie Mellon Univ., Pittsburg, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wilson, W. (1979), “Feeling More Than We Can Know: Exposure Effects Without Learning,” J. Pers. and Soc. Psych., 37(6), 811–821.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zajonc, R. (1980), “Feeling and Thinking: Preferences Need No Inferences,” Amer. Psych., 35,151–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zajonc, R. (1981), “A One-Factor Mind About Mind and Emotion,” Amer. Psych., 36, 102–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zajonc, R. and H. Markus (1982), “Affective and Cognitive Factors in Preferences,” J. Cons. Res., 9(2), 123–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mishra, S., Shenoy, P.P. (1994). Attitude Formation Models: Insights from TETRAD. In: Cheeseman, P., Oldford, R.W. (eds) Selecting Models from Data. Lecture Notes in Statistics, vol 89. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2660-4_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2660-4_23

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-94281-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-2660-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics