Skip to main content

Reuse and sharing of graphical belief network components

  • Conference paper
Selecting Models from Data

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Statistics ((LNS,volume 89))

Abstract

A team of experts assemble a graphical belief network from many small pieces. This paper catalogs the types of knowledge that comprise a graphical belief network and proposes a way in which they can be stored in libraries. This promotes reuse of model components both within the team and between projects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Almond, Russell G. (1990)Fusion and Propagation in Graphical Belief Models: An Implementation and an Example. Ph.D. dissertation and Harvard University, Department of Statistics, Technical Report S-130.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Almond, Russell G. (1992a) “Libraries, Books and Bookcases: A System for Organizing Re-Usable Knowledge.”Statistical Science Research Report 5, StatSci, 1700 Westlake Ave, N, Seattle, WA.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Almond, Russell G.[ 1992b ] “GRAPHICAL-BELIEF: Project Overview and Review.”Statistical Science Research Report 14 StatSci.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bradshaw, Jeffery M., Covington, Stanley P., Russo, Peter J. and Boose, John H. (1991) “Knowledge acquisition techniques for decision analysis using AXOTL and AQUINAS.”Knowledge Acquisition 3, 49–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bradshaw, J.M., Chapman, C.R., Sullivan, K.M., Almond, R.G., Madigan, D., Zarley, D., Gavrin, J., Nims, J., and Bush, N. (1992a) “KS-3000: an application of DDUCKS to bonemarrow transplant patient support.” Presented at theSixth Annual Florida AI Research Symposium (FLAIRS ’93), Ft. Lauderdale, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bradshaw, J. M., Holm, P. D., Boose, J. H., Skuce, D., and Lethbridge, T. C. (1992b) “Sharable ontologies as a basis for communication and collaboration in conceptual modeling.”Proceedings of the Seventh Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge-Based Systems Workshop. Banff, Alberta, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dempster, Arthur P. and Kong, Augustine (1988) “Uncertain Evidence and Artificial Analysis.”Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference,20, 355–368.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Edgar, J.W., Puerta, A.R., Musen, M. A. (1992) “Graph-grammar assistance for modelling of decision.” Proceedings of the Seventh Banff Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge-Based Systems Workshop, pp 7:1–19. Banff, Alberta, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Genesereth, M. R., and Fikes, R. (1992) “Knowledge Interchange Format Version 3.0 Reference Manual”No. Logic Group Report, Logic-92-1. Stanford University Department of Computer Science.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gruber, T. R. (1991) “The role of common ontology in achieving sharable, reusable knowledge bases.” In J. A. Allen, R. Fikes, and E. Sandewall (Eds.),Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Proceedings of the Second International ConfEventName (pp 601–602 ). Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gruber, T. R. (1992a) “Ontolingua: A mechanism to support portable ontologies, Version 3.0.”No. Stanford Knowledge Systems Laboratory Technical Report KSL 91-66. Stanford University Department of Computer Science.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gruber, T. R. (1992b) “A translation approach to portable ontology specifications.”Proceedings of the Seventh Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge-Based Systems Workshop. Banff, Alberta, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Heckerman, D. (1991)Probabilistic Similarity Networks, ACM Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Henrion, M., Breese, J.S., and Horvitz, E.J. (1991). “Decision analysis and expert systems.”AI Magazine, 1991, 64–91.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Holtzman, S. H. (1989)Intelligent Decision Systems. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mas¬sachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Howard, R. A. and Matheson, J. E.[ 1981 ] “Influence diagrams.” Principles and Applications of Decision Analysis. Strategic Decisions Group, Menlo Park, California.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kong, Augustine(1988) “A Belief Function Generalization of Gibbs Ensembles,”Joint Technical Report S-122 Harvard University and No. 239 University of Chicago, Departments of Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lethbridge, T. C., and Skuce, D. (1992) “Informality in knowledge exchange.” Working Notes of the AAAI-92Knowledge Representation Aspects of Knowledge Acquisition Workshop, 92.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Neches, R., Fikes, R., Finin, T., Gruber, T., Patil, R., Senator, T., and Swartout, W. R. (1991) “Enabling technology for knowledge sharing.”AI Magazine, pp 36–55.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pearl, Judea [ 1988 ]Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, California.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Shachter, R. D. (1986) “Evaluating Influence Diagrams.”Operations Research,34, 871–82.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Shafer, Glenn and Shenoy, Prakash P. (1988) “Bayesian and Belief-Function Propagation.”School of Business Working Paper No. 192. University of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Shenoy, Prakash P. and Shafer, Glenn (1990) “Axioms for Probability and Belief-Function Propagation.” inUncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, 4, 169–198.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Skuce, D., and Monarch, I. (1990) “Ontological issues in knowledge base design: Some problems and suggestions.”Proceedings of the Fifth Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge-Based Systems Workshop, Banff, Alberta, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Spiegelhalter, David J. and Lauritzen, Steffen L. (1990) “Sequential Updating of Con-ditional Probabilities on Directed Graphical Structures.”Networks,20, 579–605.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Wellman,M. Breese, J.S. and Goldman, R.P. (1991) “Working notes from the AAAI-91 Knowledge-Based Construction of Probabilistic and Decision Models.” Anahiem, CA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Almond, R., Bradshaw, J., Madigan, D. (1994). Reuse and sharing of graphical belief network components. In: Cheeseman, P., Oldford, R.W. (eds) Selecting Models from Data. Lecture Notes in Statistics, vol 89. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2660-4_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2660-4_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-94281-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-2660-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics