Skip to main content

Abstract

Approaches to set estimation based on a decision-theoretic formulation have usually used a loss function that is a linear combination of volume and coverage probability. Such loss functions can suffer from paradoxical behavior of the Bayes rules, and thus may not be appropriate. We investigate the behavior of optimal set estimators for different classes of loss functions and study their decision-theoretic properties.

Research supported by National Science Foundation Grant No. DMS91-00839.

Research supported by National Science Foundation Grant No. DMS88-09016.

Research supported by the U.S. Army Research Office through the Mathematical Sciences Institute at Cornell University.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Berger, J. O. (1985). Statistical Decision Theory and Bayesian Analysis. 2nd edition, Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blyth, C. R. and Hutchinson, D. W. (1961). Tables of Neyman-Shortest Confidence Intervals for the Binomial Parameter. Biometrika 47, 381–391.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Casella, G. and Hwang, J. T. (1991). Evaluating confidence sets using loss functions. Statist. Sinica 1, 159–173.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Casella, G., Hwang, J. T. G., and Robert, C. P. (1993). A paradox in decision-theoretic interval estimation. Statist. Sinica 3 (1), 141–155.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A. and Strawderman, W. E. (1973). Admissibility implications for different criteria in confidence estimation. Ann. Statist. 1, 363–366.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • DeGroot, M. (1970). Optimal Statistical Decisions. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, J. T. and Casella, G. (1982). Minimax confidence sets for the mean of a multivariate normal distribution. Ann. Statist. 10, 868–881.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, J. T. and Casella, G. (1984). Improved set estimators for a multivariate normal mean. Statistics and Decisions, Supplement Issue 1, 3–16.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Joshi, V. M. (1969). Admissibility of the usual confidence set for the mean of a univariate or bivariate normal population. Ann. Math. Statist. 40, 1042–1067.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lindley, D. (1985). Making Decisions. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meeden, G. and Vardeman, S. (1985). Bayes and admissible set estimation. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 80, 465–471.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Casella, G., Hwang, J.T.G., Robert, C.P. (1994). Loss Functions for Set Estimation. In: Gupta, S.S., Berger, J.O. (eds) Statistical Decision Theory and Related Topics V. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2618-5_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2618-5_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-7609-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-2618-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics